Advertisement

Transinguinal Preperitoneal (TIPP) Inguinal Hernia Repair Using a Totally Extraperitoneal, Parietalized, Memory-Ring Patch

  • Jean-François Gillion
  • Edouard Pelissier
Chapter

Abstract

Basically TIPP is a TEP technique performed through a minimal invasive inguinal route, using the herniated orifice and avoiding any additional muscular or fascial incision. While allowing lighter anesthesia, TIPP could be more fitted with D case surgery.

References

  1. 1.
    Bjurstrom MF, Nicol AL, Amid PK, et al. Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2014;7:277–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bischoff JM, Aasvang EK, Kehlet H, Werner MV. Does nerve identification during open inguinal herniorrhaphy reduce the risk of nerve damage and persistent pain? Hernia. 2012;16:573–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reinpold VM, Nehls J, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study. Ann Surg. 2011;254:163–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johner A, Faulds J, Wiseman SM. Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2011;150:534–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hsu W, Chen CS, Lee HC, Liang HH, Kuo LJ, Wei PL, Tam KW. Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012;36:2311–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu H, Zheng X, Gu Y, Guo S. A meta-analysis examining the use of fibrin glue mesh fixation versus suture mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair. Dig Surg. 2014;31:444–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colvin HS, Rao A, Cavali M, Campanelli G, Amin AI. Glue versus suture fixation of mesh during open repair of inguinal hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2013;37:2282–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ladwa N, Sajid MS, Sains P, Baig MK. Suture mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2013;11:128–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanders DL, Waydia S. A systematic review of randomized control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2014;18:165–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Goede B, Klitsie PJ, van Kempen BJ, Timmermans L, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Lange JF. Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2013;100:735–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1373–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D. Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;207:773–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pandanaboyana S, Mittapalli D, Rao A, Prasad R, Ahmed N. Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon. 2014;12:87–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Annibali R, Quinn T, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Avoiding nerve injury during laparoscopic hernia repair: critical areas for staple placement. In: Arregui M, Nagan RF, editors. Inguinal hernia. Advances or controversies? Oxford, NY: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1994. p. 41–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD001785.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O'Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 2012;255:846–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, Tao W, Jianguo L, Xianli H. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res. 2014;192:409–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koning GG, Wetterslev J, van Laarhoven CJ, Keus F. The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials. PLoS One. 2013;8:e52599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langeveld HR, van't Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen MPS, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;251:819–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eker HH, Langeveld HR, Klitsie PJ, van’t Riet M, Staessen LP, Weidema WF, Steyerberg EW, Lange JF, Bonjer HJ, Keekel J. Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Surg. 2012;147:256–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C. Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97:600–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Westin L, Wollert S, Ljungdahl M, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Dahlstrand U. Less pain 1 year after total extra-peritoneal repair compared with Lichtenstein using Local anesthesia: data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263:240–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schouten N, Simmermacher RK, van Dalen T, Smakman N, Clevers GJ, Davids PH, Verleisdonk EJ, Burgmans JP. Is there an end of the “learning curve” of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2013;27:789–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rives J, Lardennois B, Flament JB, Convers G. La pièce en tulle de Dacron, traitement de choix des hernies de l’aine de l’adulte. A propose de 183 cas. Chirurgie. 1973;99:564–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arlt G, Schumpelick V. Die transinguinale präperitoneale Netzplastik (TIPP) in der Versorgung der Rezidivleistenhernie. Chirurg. 1997;68:1235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pélissier EP, Monek O, Blum D, et al. The Polysoft patch: prospective evaluation of feasibility, postoperative pain and recovery. Hernia. 2007;11:229–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pélissier EP. Preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia. Re: Preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia: a prospective multicentric feasibility study, Berrevoet et al. Hernia. 2009;13:451–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gillion JF, Chollet JM. Chronic pain and quality of life (QoL) after transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair using a totally extraperitoneal, parietalized, Polysoft ® memory ring patch: a series of 622 hernia repairs in 525 patients. Hernia. 2013;17:683–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution and principles. Hernia. 2004;8(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stoppa R, Diarra B, Mertl P. The retroparietal spermatic sheath—an anatomical structure of surgical interest. Hernia. 1997;1:55–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diarra B, Stoppa R, Verhaeghe P, Mertl P. About prolongations of the urogenital fascia into the pelvis: an anatomic study and general remarks on the interparietal-peritoneal faciae. Hernia. 1997;1:191–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gillion JF. Reply to: invited comment “Chronic pain and quality of life after transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair: a few tips on TIPP”. D.C. Chen and P. Amid. Hernia. 2013;17(6):697–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1138-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Koning GG, Keus F, Koeslag L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein’s method for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1365–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berrevoet F, Sommeling C, De Gendt S, et al. The preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia: a prospective multicentric feasibility study. Hernia. 2009;13:243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pélissier EP, Blum D, Ngo P, et al. Transinguinal preperitoneal repair with the Polysoft patch: prospective evaluation of recurrence and chronic pain. Hernia. 2008;12:51–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maillart JF, Vantournhoudt P, Piret-Gerard G, et al. Transinguinal preperitoneal groin hernia repair using a preperitoneal mesh preformed with a permanent memory ring: a good alternative to Lichtenstein’s technique. Hernia. 2011;15:289–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koning GG, de Vries J, Borm GF, et al. Health status one year after transinguinal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and Lichtenstein’s method: an analysis alongside a randomized clinical study. Hernia. 2013;17:299–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koning GG, Adang EM, Stalmeier PF, et al. TIPP and Lichtenstein modalities for inguinal hernia repair: a cost minimisation analysis alongside a randomised trial. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14:1027–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pélissier EP, Ngo P, Gayet B. Transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) under local anesthesia with sedation. Am Surg. 2011;77:1681–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-François Gillion
    • 1
  • Edouard Pelissier
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital Privé d’AntonyAntonyFrance

Personalised recommendations