Self-Gripping Mesh Repair in Primary Inguinal Hernia

  • Marco Gallinella Muzi
  • Agnese Cianfarani
  • Claudia Mosconi
  • Marco Colella
  • Pietro Mascagni


Since the introduction of tension-free open inguinal hernia repair, recurrence rates have dropped and chronic postoperative inguinal pain has become a major concern. Perioperative nerve damage is considered among the main causes of inguinodynia; thus atraumatic mesh fixation has become a key element in modern hernia repair.

The surgical technique of primary inguinal hernia repair using a self-gripping device differs from the classical procedure described by Amid et al. in the mesh placement and fixation step; briefly, it is crucial to overlap the mesh to the inguinal ligament for at least 2 cm, and no suturing is needed, except for a slowly absorbable stitch placed superficially above the pubic tubercule in selected cases. This surgical approach has proven not to be inferior to the gold standard Lichtenstein technique in terms of recurrence rates, while there still is an ongoing debate concerning the real incidence of chronic groin pain following this sutureless approach. In any case, the significatively shorter operative time justifies the use of this mesh from a health economics point of view, and the shallow learning curve of this technique advocates its widespread use, especially among young surgeons.


  1. 1.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman G. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery including a new concept introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg. 1986;71:1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Függer R, Scheyer M. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia. 2008;12:385–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Veen R, Wijsmuller A, Vrijland W, Hop W, Lange J, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2007;94:506–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. In: Task force on taxonomy of the IASP. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. p. 209–14.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    OʼReilly E, Burke J, OʼConnell P. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 2012;255:846–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kingsnorth A. Classifying postherniorrhaphy pain syndromes following elective inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2007;31:1766–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hakeem A. Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dittrick G, Ridl K, Kuhn J, McCarty T. Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision in inguinal hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004;188:736–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18:151–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Testini M, Lissidini G, Poli E, Gurrado A, Lardo D, Piccinni G. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing sutures, N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and human fibrin glue for mesh fixation during primary inguinal hernia repair. Can J Surg. 2010;53:155–60.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campanelli G, Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Rosenberg J, Champault G, Kingsnorth A, Miserez M. Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of tisseel/tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2012;255:650–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chastan P. Tension free open inguinal hernia repair using an innovative self gripping semi-resorbable mesh. J Minim Access Surg. 2006;2:139–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2008;13:137–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A. Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:317–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruna Esteban M, Cantos Pallarés M, Sánchez De Rojas E. Use of adhesive mesh in hernioplasty compared to the conventional technique. Results of a randomised prospective study. Cir Esp. 2010;88:253–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anadol A, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, Tezel E, Ersoy E. A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Surg Today. 2011;41:1498–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    García Ureña M, Hidalgo M, Feliu X, Velasco M, Revuelta S, Gutiérrez R, Utrera A, Porrero J, Marín M, Zaragoza C. Multicentric observational study of pain after the use of a self-gripping lightweight mesh. Hernia. 2011;15:511–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P, Eklund A, Miserez M, Smeds S. Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia. 2012;16:287–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quyn A, Weatherhead K, Daniel T. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia surgery: suture fixation versus self-adhesive mesh repair. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2012;397:1215–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pierides G, Scheinin T, Remes V, Hermunen K, Vironen J. Randomized comparison of self-fixating and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:630–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jorgensen L, Rosenberg J. Authors’ reply: randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair ( Br J Surg 2013; 100: 474-481). Br J Surg. 2013;100:1539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gys T, Gys B, Lafullarde T. The use of a self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. A prospective observational single surgeon study. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113:192–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sajid M, Farag S, Singh K, Miles W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing the role of self-gripping mesh against suture mesh fixation in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair. Updat Surg. 2013;66:189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang C, Li F, Zhang H, Zhong W, Shi D, Zhao Y. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. J Surg Res. 2013;185:653–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pandanaboyana S, Mittapalli D, Rao A, Prasad R, Ahmad N. Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon. 2014;12:87–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1080–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D. Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;207:773–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanders D, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1373–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rönkä K, Vironen J, Kössi J, et al. Randomized multicenter trial comparing glue fixation, self-gripping mesh, and suture fixation of mesh in Lichtenstein hernia repair (FinnMesh Study). Ann Surg. 2015;262:714–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smeds S, Nienhuijs S, Kullman E, Sanders D, Lehnert T, Ziprin P, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Miserez M, Kingsnorth A. Identification and management of the ilio-inguinal and ilio-hypogastric nerves in open inguinal hernia repair: benefits of self-gripping mesh. Hernia. 2015;20:33–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Seepter H, Suumann J, Tein A, Kirsimägi Ü, Lepner U. Single-center, single-blinded, randomized study of self-gripping versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2015;194:77–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang Y, Zhang X. Short-term results of open inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping Parietex ProGrip mesh in China: a retrospective study of 90 cases. Asian J Surg. 2016;39:218–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fan J, Yip J, Foo D, Lo O, Law W. Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result. Hernia. 2016;21:9–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verhagen T, Zwaans W, Loos M, Charbon J, Scheltinga M, Roumen R. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with a standard polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2016;103:812–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Čadanová D, van Dijk J, Mollen R. The transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP) in inguinal hernia repair does not cause less chronic pain in relation to the ProGrip technique: a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing the TIPP technique, using the PolySoft mesh, with the ProGrip self-fixing semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2016;21:17–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Suumann J, Kirsimägi Ü, Seepter H, Tein A, Lepner U. Three-year results of a randomized study comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2017;209:139–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ismail A, Abushouk A, Elmaraezy A, Abdelkarim A, Shehata M, Abozaid M, Ahmed H, Negida A. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh fixation methods for open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies. Surgery. 2017;162(1):18–36. Scholar
  40. 40.
    Molegraaf M, Grotenhuis B, Torensma B, de Ridder V, Lange J, Swank D. The HIPPO trial, a randomized double-blind trial comparing self-gripping parietex progrip mesh and sutured parietex mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):939–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Gallinella Muzi
    • 1
  • Agnese Cianfarani
    • 1
  • Claudia Mosconi
    • 1
  • Marco Colella
    • 1
  • Pietro Mascagni
    • 1
  1. 1.Tor Vergata University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations