Advertisement

Lichtenstein Onlay Mesh Hernioplasty: Original Technique and Personal Modifications

  • Ezio Gianetta
  • Cesare Stabilini
Chapter

Abstract

Several years have passed from the last time we read Irving Lichtenstein’s Hernia Repair Without Disability published in 1986 [1], and, despite changes and “corruptions” introduced by different authors during the years, the technique described by Lichtenstein still shows its value standing still and valid in the present days. The concept of tension-free repair for inguinal hernia represents one of the turning points of abdominal wall surgery: it was a paradigm shift from traditional tissue repair to modern mesh repair from the technical, physiopathological, and organizational standpoint.

References

  1. 1.
    Lichtenstein IL. Hernia repair without disability: a surgical atlas illustrating the anatomy, technique, and physiologic rationale of the “one day” hernia and introducing new concepts: tension-free herniorrhapies. Missouri: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157:188–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amid P, The K. Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia. 2003;7:13–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simons MP, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smietanski M, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18:151–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gianetta E, et al. Anterior tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernia under local anesthesia a 7-year experience in a teaching hospital. Ann Surg. 2000;231:132–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gianetta E, et al. Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg. 1997;84:983–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-dabbagh A. Anatomical variations of the inguinal nerves and risks of injury in 110 hernia repairs. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24:102–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott N, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4).  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
  10. 10.
    Fang Z, et al. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:910–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhong C, et al. A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2013;20:24–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uzzaman M, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16:505–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ismail A, et al. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh fixation methods for open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies. Surgery. 2017;162(1):18–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations