Intergenerational Value Differences in Latvia and Azerbaijan

Chapter
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)

Abstract

This study was conducted in two post-Soviet countries: Latvia and Azerbaijan. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Latvia and Azerbaijan took different developmental paths: Latvia became more oriented toward Western Europe, while Azerbaijan became closer to Turkey and to the Islamic world. Our study identifies similarities and differences in the value priorities of ethnic majorities and Russian ethnic minorities in these countries. Our samples included two generations of Russians in Azerbaijan, Azerbaijanis, Russians in Latvia, and Latvians. We used the 57-item Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised (PVQ-R) to measure individual values. We have conducted group comparison between two generations within countries among majorities and Russian minorities (1), within generations between countries (2), and across countries on a family level (3) using paired samples t-test and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for groups’ comparison. We discuss the revealed value differences based on age of participants, their majority or minority status, ethnic self-identification, differences of sociocultural contexts, and different trajectories of post-Soviet development.

Keywords

Values Generation Between-country comparison Ethnic majorities Ethnic minorities Post-Soviet countries 

References

  1. Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., & Wisnubrata, L. (2009). Intergenerational transmission of values in different cultural contexts: A study in Germany and Indonesia. In A. Gari & K. Mylonas (Eds.), Quod erat demonstrandum: From Herodotus’ ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research (pp. 221–230). Athens: Pedio Books.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (1995). Broad and narrow socialization: The family in the context of a cultural theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 617–628.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehnke, K., Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2007). Parent-child value similarity: The role of Zeitgeist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 778–792.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00405.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cara, O. (2006). The acculturation modes of the Russian-speaking adolescents in Latvia: Perceived discrimination and knowledge of the Latvian language. Europe-Asia Studies, 58, 751–773.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600732100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cara, O. (2010). The acculturation of Russian-speaking adolescents in Latvia: Language issues three years after the 2004 education reform. European Education, 42(1), 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu, M. L., Feldman, S. S., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1992). The influence of immigration on parental behaviour and adolescent distress in Chinese families residing in two Western nations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2(3), 205–239.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0203_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danis, W., Liu, L. A., & Vacek, J. (2011). Values and upward influence strategies in transition: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 288–306.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fierman, W. (2012). Russian in Post-Soviet Central Asia: A comparison with the states of the Baltic and South Caucasus. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(6), 1077–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.691722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. E. (2003). Culture and cognitive development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461–490.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groys, B. (2008). Beyond diversity: Cultural studies and its post-communist other. In B. Groys (Ed.), Art power (pp. 149–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hadjar, A., Boehnke, K., Knafo, A., Daniel, E., Musiol, A.-L., Schiefer, D., et al. (2012). Parent-child value similarity and subjective well-being in the context of migration: An exploration. Family Science, 3, 55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2011.671502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivlevs, A. (2013). Minorities on the move? Assessing post-enlargement emigration intentions of Latvia’s Russian speaking minority. The Annals of Regional Science, 51, 33–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0534-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwast-Welfel, J., Boski, P., & Rovers, M. (2008). Intergenerational value similarity in Polish immigrant families in Canada in comparison to intergenerational value similarity in Polish and Canadian non-immigrant families. In G. Zheng, K. Leung, & J. G. Adair (Hrsg.), Perspectives and progress in contemporary cross-cultural psychology (S. 193–209). Online-Edition. IACCP.Google Scholar
  14. Luscombe, L., & Kazdal, V. (2014). Language and identity in a post-Soviet world: Language of education and linguistic identity among Azerbaijani students. Nationalities Papers, 42(6), 1015–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2014.938034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muižnieks, N., Rozenvalds, J., & Birka, I. (2013). Ethnicity and social cohesion in the post-Soviet Baltic states. Patterns of Prejudice, 47(3), 288–308.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2013.812349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Musabekov, R. (2009). Stanovlenie Azerbajdzhanskogo gosudarstva i jetnicheskie men’shinstva [The formation of the Azerbaijani state and ethnic minorities]. Azerbajdzhan i Azerbajdzhancy v Mire [Azerbaijan and Azerbaijanis in the World], 2, 41–42.Google Scholar
  17. Musabekov, R., & Shulman, R. (2010). Azerbajdzhan v 2006–2010 godah. Sociologicheskij monitoring. Sravnitel'nyj analiz dannyh sociologicheskih issledovanij, provedennyh v respublike v 2006–2010 godah [Azerbaijan in the period 2006–2010. Sociological monitoring. Comparative analysis of data of sociological research conducted in the Republic in 2006–2010]. Baku: Puls-R.Google Scholar
  18. Phinney, J. S., Ong, A., & Madden, T. (2000). Cultural values and intergenerational value discrepancies in immigrant and non-immigrant families. Child Development, 71, 528–539.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (1990). Immigrant American: A portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rick, K., & Forward, J. (1992). Acculturation and perceived intergenerational differences among youth. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022192231006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rindfuss, R. L., Liao, T. F., & Tsuya, N. O. (1992). Contact with parents in Japan: Effects on opinions towards gender and intergenerational roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 812–822.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rothbaum, F., Pott, M., Azuma, H., Miyake, H., & Weisz, J. (2000). The development of close relationships in Japan and the U.S.: Paths of symbiotic harmony and generative tension. Child Development, 71, 1121–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmid, C. (2008). Ethnicity and language tensions in Latvia. Language Policy, 7(1), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-007-9068-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schoeni, R., Mccarthy, K., & Vernez, G. (1996). The mixed economic prospects of immigrants. Santa Monica, CA: RAND-Center for Research and Immigration Policy.Google Scholar
  25. Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 174–185.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032002005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: An overview. Retrieved from http://segr-did2.fmag.unict.it/Allegati/convegno%207-8-10-05/Schwartzpaper.pdf
  27. Schwartz, S. H., Butenko, T. P., Sedova, D. S., & Lipatova, A. S. (2012). Utochnennaja teorija bazovyh individual’nyh cennostej: primenenie v Rossii [Refined theory of basic human values: Validation in Russia]. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher school of Economics], 9(2), 63–70 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Statistical Yearbook of Latvia. (2014). Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Riga.Google Scholar
  30. Steinberg, L. (1990). Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship. In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 255–276). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Szapocznik, J., & Kurtines, W. M. (1993). Family psychology and cultural diversity: Opportunities for theory, research, and application. American Psychologist, 48, 400–407.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vedder, P., Berry, J., Sabatier, C., & Sam, D. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of values in national and immigrant families: The role of Zeitgeist. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 642–653.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9375-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitbeck, L. B., & Gecas, V. (1988). Value attributions and value transmission between parents and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 829–840.  https://doi.org/10.2307/352651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. (1996). Adolescent–parent conflict among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Development, 67, 1262–1275.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yunusov, A. (2001). Jetnicheskij sostav Azerbajdzhana (po perepisi 1999 goda). Set’ jetnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdenija konfliktov [The ethnic composition of Azerbaijan (according to 1999 Census). Network of ethnological monitoring and early conflict prevention]. Retrieved from http://old.iea.ras.ru/topic/census/mon/yunus_mon2001.htm
  36. Zepa, B., Supule, I., Klave, E., Krastina, L., Krisane, J., & Tomsome, I. (2005). Ethnopolitical tension in Latvia: Looking for the conflict solution. Riga: Baltic Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations