Identity and Work Ethic of Peasants in the Context of the Post-Soviet Socio-economic Transformation

Chapter
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)

Abstract

The chapter analyses transformations of identity and work ethic among peasants through the lens of moral emotions based on the empirical data from thirty semi-structured interviews collected in villages of the agricultural region of Russia. We present the following logic of transformations: changed sociocultural conditions, including public sentiment towards agricultural labour, lead to the transformation of identity of the peasantry. The decision to concentrate on emotions emerged in the aftermath of a more general study of the social and structural conditions in the Russian villages, which resulted in interviews abounding with peasants’ representations of negative emotions. The authors outline the phenomenon of ‘contempt for rural/physical labour’ from both the immediate surrounding environment and wider society more generally. This emotional backdrop brings with it negative effects such as shame and envy that, in turn, corrode self-esteem among the peasants, leading even to withdrawal from active employment on the land and the weakening of social ties.

Keywords

Social identity Personal identity Work ethic Post-Soviet village Shame Envy Contempt for rural/physical labour 

References

  1. Agrarnaya reforma v Rossii: kontseptsiya, opyt, perspektivy [Agrarian reform in Russia: conception, experience, perspectives]. (2000). Nauchnye trudy VIA-PI RASKhN [Scientific works of VIA-PI RASKhN], Moscow, Entsiklopediya rossiyskikh dereven’, 4 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Antonova, L. E. (2007). Gruppa slov s semantikoy styda v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The word group with semantics of shame in modern Russian language]. XXVI Mezhdunarodnaya Filologicheskaya Konferentsiya [XXVI International Philological Conference], 19, 177–180 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  3. Apresyan, Y. D. (2004). Stydit’sya, stesnyat’sya, smushchat’sya, konfuzit’sya [Be ashamed, be embarrassed, be disconcerted]. Novyy Ob”yasnitel’nyy Slovar’ Sinonimov Russkogo Yazyka [The new explanatory vocabulary of synonyms in Russian language]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury: Venskiy slavisticheskiy al’manakh [Languages of Slavic culture: Viennese Slavic Almanac] (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. Barbalet, J. M. (1999). Emotion, social theory and social structure: A macrosociological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Belanovskiy, S. A. (2001). Glubokoe interv’yu [In-depth interview]. M.: Nikkolo – Media (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Beskova, T. V. (2013). Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniya zavisti i ee determinanty [Phychological mechanisms of envy formation and envy determinants]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Oblastnogo Universiteta [Journal of Moscow Region State University], 1, 18–33 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  8. Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2096259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase, E., & Walker, R. (2013). The co-construction of shame in the context of poverty: Beyond a threat to the social bond. Sociology, 47(4), 739–754.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512453796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clanton, G. (2006). Jealousy and envy. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 410–440). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Efendiev, A. G., & Bolotina, I. A. (2002). Sovremennoe rossiyskoe selo: Na perelome epokh i reform. Opyt institutsional’nogo analiza [Modern Russian village: At turning point of century and reforms. Experience of institutional analysis]. Mir Rossii [The Universe of Russia], 11 (4), 83–125 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Efendiev, A. G., Sorokin, P. S., & Kozlova, M. A. (2014). Transformations in the rural life in Russian Belgorod Region in 2000–2013 through “modernization” theoretical perspective: Increasing material well-being, growing individualism and persisting pessimism/Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series SOC “Sociology”. No. WP BRP 56/SOC/2014.
  14. Jo, N. Y. (2013). Psycho-social dimensions of poverty: When poverty becomes shameful. Critical Social Policy, 33(3), 514–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Magun, V. S. (1998). Rossiyskie trudovye tsennosti: ideologiya i massovoe soznanie [Russian labor values: Ideology and mass consciousness]. Mir Rossii [The Universe of Russia], 7(4), 17–28 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Retzinger, S. M. (1995). Identifying anger and shame in discourse. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(8), 1104–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryvkina, R.V. (2001). Drama peremen [Drama of social transformations]. Moscow: Delo (in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (1991). Envy and jealousy: Self and society. In P. Salovey (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 271–286). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Scheff, T. J. (2000). Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheff, T. J. (2002). Working class emotions and relationships: Secondary analysis of Sennett, Cobb and Willis. In B. Phillips, H. Kincaid, & T. J. Scheff (Eds.), Toward a sociological imagination: Bridging specialized fields (pp. 263–292). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  22. Scheff, T. J. (2011). Social-emotional world: Mapping a continent. Current Sociology, 59(3), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheff, T. J. (2014). The ubiquity of hidden shame in modernity. Cultural Sociology, 8(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheff, T. J., & Retzinger, S. M. (1991). Violence and emotions: Shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  25. Schoeck, H. (1970). Envy: A theory of social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
  26. Shott, S. (1979). Emotion and social life: A symbolic interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1317–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonova, O. A. (2014a). Sotsiologiya emotsiy i sotsiologiya morali: moral’nye emotsii v sovremennom obshchestve [Sociology of emotions and sociology of morality: Moral emotions in contemporary society]. Sotsiologicheskiy Ezhegodnik 2013–2014 [Sociological Yearbook 2013–2014], 148–187 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Simonova, O. A. (2014b). Styd i bednost’: posledstviya dlya sotsial’noy politiki [Shame and poverty: The consequences for social policy]. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Sotsial’noy Politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies], 12(4), 539–554 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  29. Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2006). The moral identity: A principle level identity. In K. McClelland & T. J. Fararo (Eds.), Purpose, meaning and action: Control systems theories in sociology (pp. 293–310). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 7(1), 120–140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411433762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stets, J. E., Carter, M. J., Harrod, M. M., Cerven, C., & Abrutyn, S. (2008). The moral identity, status, moral emotions and normative order. In J. Clay-Warner & D. T. Robinson (Eds.), Social structure and emotion (pp. 227–251). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stryker, S. (2004). Integrating emotion into identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Theory and research on human emotions (pp. 1–23). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2005). The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Velikiy, P. P. (2007). Sotsial’naya politika na sele: Novye vyzovy, starye ogranicheniya [Social policy in rural areas: New challenges, old restrictions]. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Sotsial’noy Politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies], 5(2), 231–244 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  35. Walker, D. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–559.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations