Treatment Planning for Implants in the Aesthetic Zone: Biological, Functional, and Aesthetic Considerations

  • Peter K. Moy
  • Todd R. Schoenbaum
  • Sam Alawie


Proper interdisciplinary treatment planning is the cornerstone of implant treatment in the aesthetic zone. It requires diligent and thoughtful consideration of surgical, prosthetic, and technical aspects of the care to be provided. Though some cases will present similar challenges, no two are identical. Patients will be best served when the clinicians and technicians involved on the case understand the challenges faced by the other team members. Additionally, depending on the severity of the defect, patient expectations may need to be tempered to accept the clinical realities of their case. The “team approach” is key here. Each member should know and be able to predict what the others are going to be doing during their treatment stage. Often an immediate load approach will be attempted in the aesthetic zone. This requires high-level coordination, collaboration, and communication.


Implants Aesthetic zone Treatment planning Diagnosis Interdisciplinary 


  1. 1.
    Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, et al. Periodontitis, implant loss and peri-implantitis. A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):e8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levine RA, Nack G. Team treatment planning for the replacement of esthetic zone teeth with dental implants. Compendium. 2011;32(4):44–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:569–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walia K, Belludi SA, Kulkarni P, Darak P, Swamy S. A comparative and a qualitative analysis of patient’s motivations, expectations and satisfaction with dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):ZC23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rustemeyer J, Bremerich A. Patients’ knowledge and expectations regarding dental implants: assessment by questionnaire. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(9):814–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Patients’ expectations from dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brägger U, Lang NP. Patients’ satisfaction following implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly JR, Rungruanganunt P. Fatigue behavior of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture ceramic abutments as a function of design and ceramics processing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):601–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(1):138–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hürzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(3):577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Perio Rest Dent. 2006;26:9–17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canullo L, Tallarico M, Chu S, Pennarocha D, Özcan M, Dent DM, Pesce P. Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization protocols employed for customized implant abutments: an international survey of 100 universities worldwide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(4):774–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wadhwani CP, Schoenbaum T, King KE, Chung KH. Techniques to optimize color esthetics, bonding, and peri-implant tissue health with titanium implant abutments. Compendium. 2018;39(2):110–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferreira CF, Buttendorf AR, de Souza JG, Dalago H, Guenther SF, Bianchini MA. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases: analysis of associated factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2015;23(4):199–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goncalves Motta SH, Ferreira Camacho MP, Carvalho Quíntela D, Santana RB. Relationship between clinical and histologic periodontal biotypes in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(5):737–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter K. Moy
    • 1
  • Todd R. Schoenbaum
    • 2
  • Sam Alawie
    • 3
  1. 1.Dental Implant Center, University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Division of Constitutive and Regenerative SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Beverly Hills Dental LabBeverly HillsUSA

Personalised recommendations