Advertisement

Are Right-Wing Populist Parties a Threat to Democracy?

  • Marcus SpittlerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Whether right-wing populist parties pose a threat or a corrective for democracies has been a matter of extensive theoretical debate. This chapter examines the effect these parties exert on democratic quality by means of a comparative quantitative analysis. Focusing on democracies in Western and Eastern Europe, it takes a closer look at democracy’s partial regimes, such as the rule of law, representation, the public sphere, and participation. The results are twofold: First, in line with the theoretical expectations, right-wing populists have a negative effect on democratic quality when they are in government. Second, indirect effects caused by populists’ electoral successes are rare. While the presence of populists enhances participation and aspects of representation, they have a negative influence on the public sphere.

References

  1. Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkerman, T. (2012). Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (19962010). West European Politics, 35(3), 511–529.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkerman, T. (2015). Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: A fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades. Party Politics, 21(1), 54–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkerman, T. (2016). The party for freedom: Balancing between mission, votes and office. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 145–168). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Akkerman, T., & de Lange, S. L. (2012). Radical right parties in office: Incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing. Government and Opposition, 47(4), 574–596.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01375.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Into the mainstream? A comparative analysis of the programmatic profiles of radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe over time. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 31–52). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (Eds.). (2008). Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of western European democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Albertazzi, D., McDonnell, D., & Newell, J. L. (2011). Di Lotta E Di Governo: The Lega Nord and Rifondazione Comunista in office. Party Politics, 17(4), 471–487.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811400523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Albertazzi, D., & Mueller, S. (2013). Populism and liberal democracy: Populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland. Government and Opposition, 48(3), 343–371.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Alonso, S., & Claro da Fonseca, S. (2012). Immigration, left and right. Party Politics, 18(6), 865–884.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810393265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arditi, B. (2005). Populism as an internal periphery of democratic politics. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 72–98). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 19992010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batory, A. (2016). Populists in government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”. Democratization, 23(2), 283–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beck, J. N., Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Katz, N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blauberger, M., & Kelemen, R. D. (2017). Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 321–336.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1229357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolin, N., Lidén, G., & Nyhlén, J. (2014). Do anti-immigration parties matter? The case of the Sweden democrats and local refugee policy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 323–343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brüderl, J. (2010). Kausalanalyse mit Paneldaten. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse (pp. 963–994). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., & Weßels, B. (2012). The democracy barometer: A new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science, 11(4), 519–536.  https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Lange, S. L. (2012). New alliances: Why mainstream parties govern with radical right-wing populist parties. Political Studies, 60(4), 899–918.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00947.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Decker, F. (Ed.). (2006). Populismus: Gefahr für die Demokratie oder nützliches Korrektiv? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  26. Fomina, J., & Kucharczyk, J. (2016). Populism and protest in Poland. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 477–497.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grotz, F., & Müller-Rommel, F. (2015). Schwache Regierungschefs? Politische Erfahrung und Amtsdauer von Premierministern in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 46(2), 310–327.  https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2015-2-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gschwend, T., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Research design in political science: How to practice what they preach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guérot, U. (2017). Der neue Bürgerkrieg: das offene Europa und seine Feinde. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
  32. Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3), 91–130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heinisch, R., & Hauser, K. (2016). The mainstreaming of the Austrian freedom party: The more things change. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 73–93). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Hillen, S., & Steiner, N. D. (2017). Left-authoritarians and voter turnout in West European countries. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2947782. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  36. Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2015). Friend or foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America: Friend or foe? Populism and democracy. Political Studies, n/a–n/a. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12219. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9248.12219. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  37. Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). A drunken guest in Europe?: The influence of populist radical right parties on democratic quality. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 10(2), 103–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-016-0302-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-Nots and cultural backlash. HKS Working Paper No, RWP16-026. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818659. Accessed 12 Sept 2017
  39. Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe?: Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kitschelt, H. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  42. Laclau, E. (2005a). On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Laclau, E. (2005b). Populism: What’s in a name? In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–47). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Lewandowsky, M. (2012). Rechtspopulismus als Herausforderung für die Demokratie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In T. Mörschel & C. Krell (Eds.), Demokratie in Deutschland (pp. 389–411). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacRea, D., & Gellner, E. (1969). Populism as an ideology. In G. Ionescu (Ed.), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics (pp. 153–164). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  47. Markowski, R. (2016). The polish parliamentary election of 2015: A free and fair election that results in unfair political consequences. West European Politics, 39(6), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1177305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mazzoleni, O. (2016). Staying away from the mainstream: The case of the Swiss People’s party. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 193–207). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merkel, W., Bochsler, D., Bousbah, K., Bühlmann, M., Giebler, H., Hänni, M., Heyne, L., Müller, L., Ruth, S., & Weßels, B. (2016). Democracy barometer. Methodology. Version 5. Aarau: Zentrum für Demokratie.Google Scholar
  52. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Thinking in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Mouffe, C., & Wagner, E. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  55. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mudde, C. (2013). Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what? European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mudde, C. (2017). Introduction to the populist radical right. In C. Mudde (Ed.), The populist radical right: A reader (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism: Corrective and threat to democracy. In C. Mudde & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? (pp. 205–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Müller, J.-W. (2016). Was ist populismus? Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  63. Norris, P., & Grömping, M. (2017). Populist Threats to electoral integrity: The year in elections, 2016-2017. HKS Working Paper No. RWP17-018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2965729. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
  64. Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2015). Populists in parliament: Comparing left-wing and right-wing populism in the Netherlands: Populists in parliament. Political Studies, 63(1), 60–79.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Panizza, F. (2005). Populism and the mirror of democracy—introduction. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  66. Pedahzur, A., & Weinberg, L. (2001). Modern European democracy and its enemies: The threat of the extreme right. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2(1), 52–72.  https://doi.org/10.1080/714005438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Röth, L., Afonso, A., & Spies, D. C. (2017). The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, published online: 13 June 2017. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000133.
  69. Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2011). Populismus in vergleichender Perspektive. Berliner Debatte Initial, 22(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
  70. Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Taggart, P. (2016). Dealing with populists in government: A framework for analysis. Democratization, 23(2), 201–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1058785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review, 5, 1), 1–1),26.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schain, M. A. (2006). The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: Measuring direct and indirect effects. West European Politics, 29(2), 270–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500512619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stanley, B. (2016). Confrontation by default and confrontation by design: Strategic and institutional responses to Poland’s populist coalition government. Democratization, 23(2), 263–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1058782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A., & Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 420–439.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781403920072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tännsjö, T. (1992). Populist democracy: A defence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Teorell, J., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Khomenko, A., & Svensson, R. (2017). QoG standard dataset 2017. The quality of government institute, University of Gothenburg. doi:  https://doi.org/10.18157/QoGStdJan17.
  83. Treib, O. (2014). The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.941534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Hauwaert, S. M., & Van Kessel, S. (2017). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, first published 8 June 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216.
  85. Van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist parties in Europe: Agents of discontent? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious parties anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2016). Italy: A case of mutating populism? Democratization, 23(2), 304–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wagner, A., Lewandowsky, M., & Giebler, H. (2015). Alles neu macht der Mai? In M. Kaeding & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 137–148). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  89. Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wodak, R. (2013). “Anything goes”—the Haiderization of Europe. In R. Wodak, M. Khosravinik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Rightwing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 23–38). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  91. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2010). Party government in 48 democracies (1945–1998): Composition, duration, personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  93. World Bank. (2016). World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 23 May 2017.
  94. WZB. (2017). Databank “elections, parties, governments” of the research unit “democracy and democratization”. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Democracy and DemocratizationWZB Berlin Social Science CenterBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations