Seismology and Earthquakes

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
  • Sebastiano Marasco
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 45)

Abstract

The chapter provides a large overview on seismology. The earthquake genesis, waves propagation and attenuation relationships are discussed. From the engineering point of view, the characterization of an earthquake is a key point. Thus, a detailed description of the ground motion and seismological parameters is provided.

References

  1. Aki K (1984) Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p05867
  2. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer J (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4):371–400Google Scholar
  3. Bolt B (1988) Earthquakes. W. H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434
  5. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5 spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):139–171. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2857546
  6. Fowler C (1990) The solid earth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. INGV (2013) The national institute of geophysics and vulcanology. Available at: http://www.ingv.it/en/
  8. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2981–2987Google Scholar
  9. Noson L, Qamar A, Thorsen G (1988) Washington state earthquake hazards. Report, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 85Google Scholar
  10. Page R, Boore D, WB J, Coulter H (1972) Ground motion values for use in seismic design of the trans-alaska pipeline systems. Report, USGSGoogle Scholar
  11. Reid H (1911) The mechanics of the earthquake, the California earthquake of 18 Apr 1906. Report, Report of the State Investigation CommissionGoogle Scholar
  12. Richter PJ, Nims DK, Kelly JM, Kallembach R (1990) The EDR-energy dissipating restraint. A new device for mitigation of seismic effects. In: Proceedings of the 1990 SEAOC convention, vol 1, pp 377–401Google Scholar
  13. Slemmons MD (1977) Vicksburg, miss.: U.S. army engineer waterways experiment station, soils and pavements laboratory. Report, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 85Google Scholar
  14. Trifunac M, Brady A (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(1):139–162Google Scholar
  15. USGS (2008) The 2008 U.S. geological survey national seismic hazard maps. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/
  16. Woods R (1968) Screening of surface waves in soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 94:951–979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Cimellaro
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Marasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering (DISEG)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations