Advertisement

Federal Agency Succession Planning

  • Sofia G. Loomis
Chapter

Abstract

The qualitative explanatory single case study was conducted to explore succession planning practices in a federal agency. The case study was comprised of one of the Department of the Navy federal agency’s senior civilian leader and manager interviews, direct observation, reviewing federal exit surveys, and retirement claim data. The sample population were federal employees who were GS-13 and above and had a minimum of 2 years of managerial experience working in the Washington Metro Area. There were six resultant themes identified in the explanatory case study. The case study provided insight on how succession planning occurs within the Department of the Navy to adequately facilitate the forecasted high number of retirements and retirees’ knowledge transfer within 2016 to 2021.

References

  1. Cho, Y. J., & Lewis, G. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior. Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 4–23. http://dx.doi.org.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/10.1177/0734371X11408701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jones, R. (2010). When to give notice. Federal Times Retirement. Retrieved from http://retirement.federaltimes.com
  3. Kaplan, B. (2013). Capturing, retaining, and leveraging federal agency workforce knowledge. Public Manager, 42(3), 27–29. Retrieved from http://www.astd.org
  4. Loomis, S. G. (2017). Federal employee retirement: An explanatory case study on succession planning in the department of the navy (Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10599954).Google Scholar
  5. NAVFAC. (2017). Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Retrieved from www.navfac.navy.mil
  6. Office of Personnel Management. (2013). Common characteristics of the government (CCOG). Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/federal-employment-reports/common-characteristics-of-the-government/ccog2013.pdf
  7. Office of Personnel Management. (2015a). Senior executive service exit survey results April 2015. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/senior-executive-service/reference-materials/ses-exit-survey-resultspdf.pdf
  8. Office of Personnel Management. (2015b). Projected/actual CSRS/FERS new claims, processed, and inventory. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/about-us/budget-performance/strategic-plans/retirement-processing-status.pdf
  9. Office of Personnel Management. (2017). CSRS information. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/retirement-services/csrs-information/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia G. Loomis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PhoenixTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations