Advertisement

Lean Light Fit and Tight: Fitblr Blogs and the Postfeminist Transformation Imperative

  • Sarah RileyEmail author
  • Adrienne Evans
Chapter
Part of the New Femininities in Digital, Physical and Sporting Cultures book series (NFDPSC)

Abstract

In this chapter we develop a central component of postfeminist sensibility, the transformation imperative, to analyse Fitblr content. “Fitblrs” have emerged as a recognisable element of social media blogging application Tumblr, with text and images intended to motivate followers in their exercise and dietary regimes. Research on postfeminist sensibility in traditional media has shown how transformation is represented as prescriptive, easy and pleasurable, for example in “before” and “after” photography or the reveal of the cosmetic surgery reality TV show. In focusing on user driven content emerging on Fitblr, this chapter demonstrates a shift in the discourse of transformation in which transformative work is constructed as difficult, replete with failure, and requiring physical and psychological hard work. We interpret the reference to hard work, pain and failure as part of the temporal components of health discourses in digital media, and suggest that these components represent new lines of inquiry for feminist research on exercise, health and postfeminist sensibility.

Keywords

Postfeminist sensibility Health Transformation Digital cultures Fitspiration 

References

  1. Banet-Weiser, S. (2015). “Confidence you can carry!”: Girls in crisis and the marker for girls’ empowerment organizations. Continuum, 29(2), 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banet-Weiser, S. (2017). “I’m beautiful the way I am!”: Empowerment, beauty and aesthetic labour. In A. S. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Eds.), Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Banet-Weiser, S., & Portwood-Stacer, L. (2006). “I just want to be me again!” Beauty pageants, reality television and postfeminism. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In S. L. Bartky (Ed.), Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Duke: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(1), 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boepple, L., Ata, R. N., Rum, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). Strong is the new skinny: A content analysis of fitspiration websites. Body Image, 17, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (2013). For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairns, K., & Johnston, J. (2015). Choosing health: Embodied neoliberalism, postfeminism, and the “do-diet”. Theory and Society, 44(2), 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrotte, E. R., Prichard, I., & Lim, M. S. C. (2017). “Fitspiration” on social media: A content analysis of gendered images. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, R. (2010). Dieting temporalities: Interaction, agency and the measure of online weight watching. Time and Society, 19(2), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, R., & Moreno Figueroa, M. G. (2010). Past and future perfect: Beauty, affect and hope. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford, R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10(4), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, K., & Keys, T. (2008). Starving in cyberspace: The construction of identity on “pro-eating-disorder” websites. In S. C. E. Riley, M. Burns, H. Frith, & P. Markula (Eds.), Critical Bodies: Representations, Practices and Identities of Weight and Body Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2017). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #Fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000143
  16. Dias, K. (2003). The ana sanctuary: Women’s pro-anorexia narratives in cyberspace. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4(2), 32–45.Google Scholar
  17. Dobson, A. (2015). Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media and Self Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elias, A. S., & Gill, R. (2017). Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
  19. Elias, A. S., Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2017). Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2014). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity, and Consumer Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2017a). The entrepreneurial practices of becoming a doll. In A. S. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Eds.), Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2017b). “He’s a total TubeCrush”: Post-feminist sensibility as intimate publics. Feminist Media Studies. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1367701
  23. Fahs, B. (2011). Breaking body hair boundaries: Classroom exercises for challenging social constructions of the body and sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 22(4), 482–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferreday, D. (2009). Online Belongings: Fantasy, Affect and Web Communities. Oxford: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  26. Francombe-Webb, J., & Fullagar, S. (2015, January 16). The This Girl Can campaign is all about sex, not sport. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/16/this-girl-can-campaign-sex-sport-real-women-bodies-objectifying-female-flesh
  27. Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gill, R. (2009a). Beyond the “sexualization of culture” thesis: An intersectional analysis of “sixpacks,” “midriffs” and “hot lesbians” in advertising. Sexualities, 12(2), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gill, R. (2009b). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gill, R., & Elias, A. S. (2014). “Awaken your incredible”: Love your body discourses and postfeminist contradictions. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 10(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heyes, C. (2006). Foucault goes to weight watchers. Hypatia, 21(2), 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kilbourne, J. (1999). Can’t Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Koffman, O., Orgad, S., & Gill, R. (2015). Girl power and “selfie humanitarianism”. Continuum, 29(2), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazar, M. M. (2017). “Seriously girly fun!”: Recontextualising aesthetic labour as fun and play in cosmetics advertising. In A. S. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Eds.), Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Lupton, D. (2015). Apps as artefacts: Towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Beyond Techno-Utopia: Critical Approaches to Digital Health Technologies. Switzerland: MDPI AG.Google Scholar
  37. Madsen, O. J., & Ytre-Arne, B. (2012). Me at my best: Therapeutic ideals in Norwegian women’s magazines. Communication, Culture and Critique, 5, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture, and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the perfect. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Neill, R. (2017, February 16). Rethinking beauty politics in neoliberalism symposium: Round table discussion. City University London.Google Scholar
  42. Rich, E., & Evans, J. (2008). Learning to be healthy, dying to be thin: The representation of weight via body perfection codes in schools. In S. C. E. Riley, M. Burns, H. Frith, & P. Markula (Eds.), Critical Bodies: Representations, Practices and Identities of Weight and Body Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Riley, S., Evans, A., & Mackiewicz, A. (2016). It’s just between girls: Negotiating the postfeminist gaze in women’s “looking talk”. Feminism & Psychology, 26(1), 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riley, S., Evans, A., & Robson, M. (2018). Postfeminism and Health. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Riley, S., Evans, A., Elliott, S., Rice, C., & Marecek, J. (2017). A critical review of postfeminist sensibility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12367
  46. Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2015). “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: The effect of fitspiration imagery on women’s body image. Body Image, 15, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiidenberg, K., & Edgar, G. C. (2015). Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK
  2. 2.Department of Media and CommunicationsCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations