Quantum Perspectives on Evolution

Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)


We present a view of the evolving reality based on our understanding of the recently discovered (in the time scale of human evolution) quantum laws, how they manifest at the different organizational levels of inert matter, living organisms and cultural artifacts, and what they possibly imply regarding the nature of the stuff the world is made of. What emerges is a pancognitivist framework in which the notion of quantumness enterlace with multiple aspects of our world, including the appearance of the complex life forms on the surface of our planet.


Quan Tum Cracking Well Quantum Machine Quantum Entities Gabora 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to Liane Gabora for her constructive comments that helped improving the manuscript. We are also thankful to Nelson Abreu, for providing the stimulus and motivation to write this article.


  1. D. Aerts, A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 27, 202–210 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Aerts, The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality, in The White Book of ‘Einstein Meets Magritte’, ed. by D. Aerts, et al. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999), pp. 129–183Google Scholar
  3. D. Aerts, Being and change: foundations of a realistic operational formalism, in Probing the Structure of Quantum Mechanics: Nonlinearity, Nonlocality, Probability and Axiomatics, ed. by D. Aerts, M. Czachor, T. Durt (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002), pp. 71–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Aerts, Quantum structure in cognition. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 314–348 (2009a)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Aerts, Quantum particles as conceptual entities: a possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Found. Sci. 14, 361–411 (2009b)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Aerts, Interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities. Int. J. Theor. Phys 49, 2950–2970 (2010a)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Aerts, A potentiality and conceptuality interpretation of quantum physics. Philosophica 83, 15–52 (2010b)Google Scholar
  8. D. Aerts, La mecánica cuántica y la conceptualidad: Sobre materia, historias, semántica y espacio-tiempo. Scientiae Studia 11, pp. 75–100 (2013). Translated from: D. Aerts, Quantum theory and conceptuality: matter, stories, semantics and space-time, arXiv:1110.4766 [quant-ph], Oct 2011
  9. D. Aerts, Quantum theory and human perception of the macro-world. Front. Psychol. 5(554) (2014).
  10. D. Aerts, S. Aerts, J. Broekaert, L. Gabora, The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Found. Phys. 30, 138–1414 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Aerts, S. Bundervoet, M. Czachor, B. DHooghe, L. Gabora, P. Polk, S. Sozzo, On the foundations of the theory of evolution, in Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications for our Perspectives of the World, ed. by D. Aerts, et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011)Google Scholar
  12. D. Aerts, M. Czachor, B. DHooghe, Towards a quantum evolutionary scheme: Violating Bell’s inequalities in language, in Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. A Non-Adaptationist, Systems Theoretical Approach, eds. by N. Gontier, et al. Theory and Decision Library. Series A: Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences, (Springer, 2006), pp. 453–478Google Scholar
  13. D. Aerts, L. Gabora, A theory of concepts and their combinations I: the structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34, 167–191 (2005a)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Aerts, L. Gabora, A theory of concepts and their combinations II: a hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34, 192–221 (2005b)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, The extended bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem. Ann. Phys. 351, 975–1025 (2014). See also: Ann. Phys. 366, 197–198 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, The unreasonable success of quantum probability I: quantum measurements as uniform measurements. Journal Mathematical Psychology 67, 51–75 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, The extended bloch representation of quantum mechanics. explaining superposition, interference and entanglement. J. Math. Phys. 57, 122110 (2016a)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, The GTR-model: a universal framework for quantum-like measurements, in Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics. Superpositions, Dynamics, Semantics and Identity, eds. by D. Aerts et al. (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 2016b), pp. 91–140Google Scholar
  19. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, Universal Measurements (World Scientific, Singapore, 2017a)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, S. Sozzo, T. Veloz, On the conceptuality interpretation of quantum and relativity theories. To be published in Foundations of Science, in Proceedings of the International Symposium Worlds of Entanglement, held at the Free University of Brussels (VUB) on 29–30 September 2017b. arXiv:1711.09668 [physics.hist-ph], Nov 2017
  21. D. Aerts, S. Sozzo, What is Quantum? unifying its micro-physical and structural appearance, in Quantum Interaction. QI 2014, eds. by H. Atmanspacher, et al. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8951 (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 12–23Google Scholar
  22. D. Aerts, M. Sassoli de Bianchi, S. Sozzo, On the foundations of the brussels operational-realistic approach to cognition. Front. Phys. 4, 17 (2016).
  23. P. Brugger, E. Macas, J. Ihlemann, Do sperm cells remember? Behav. Brain Res. 136, 325–328 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. J.R. Busemeyer, P.D. Bruza, Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. G.S. Engel et al., Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature 446, 782–786 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. M.P.A. Fisher, Quantum cognition: the possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain. Ann. Phys. 362, 593–602 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Gabora, D. Aerts, Contextualizing concepts. in Proceedings of the 15th International FLAIRS Conference (Special Track ‘Categorization and Concept Representation: Models and Implications’), American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Pensacola, Florida, 14–17 May 2002Google Scholar
  28. L. Gabora, D. Aerts, Evolution as context-driven actualisation of potential: toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state. Interdis. Sci. Rev. 30, 69–88 (2005a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. L. Gabora, D. Aerts, Distilling the essence of an evolutionary process and implications for a formal description of culture, in Proceedings of Center for Human Evolution Workshop 4: Cultural Evolution, 18–19 May 2000, ed. by W. Kistler, Foundation for the Future, (Bellevue, WA, 2005b)Google Scholar
  30. L. Gabora, E.O. Scott, S. Kauffman, A quantum model of exaptation: incorporating potentiality into evolutionary theory. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biology 113, 108–116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. E.M. Gauger, E. Rieper, J.J.L. Morton, S.C. Benjamin, V. Vedral, Sustained quantum coherence and entanglement in the avian compass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040503 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. E. Haven, A.Y. Khrennikov, Quantum Social Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. S.R. Hameroff, R. Penrose, Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness, in Toward a science of consciousness; the first Tucson discussions and debates eds. by S.R. Hameroff, A.W. Kaszniak, A.C. Scott, Also published in Math. Comput. Simul. 40, 453–480 (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996), pp. 507–540Google Scholar
  34. A.Y. Khrennikov, Ubiquitous Quantum Structure (Springer, Berlin, 2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. N. Lambert et al., Quantum biology. Nat. Phys. 9, 10–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. A.D. O’Connell et al., Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature 464, 697–703 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. V.V. Ogryzko, A quantum-theoretical approach to the phenomenon of directed mutations in bacteria (hypothesis). Biosystems 43, 83–95 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R. Ravindra, The Wisdom of Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras: A New Translation and Guide by Ravi Ravindra, (Morning Light Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  39. M. Sassoli de Bianchi, Taking quantum physics and consciousness seriously: What does it mean and what are the consequences? To appear, in the proceedings of the 1st ICC, held at the Research Campus of the IAC, in Portugal, from 22–24 May 2015Google Scholar
  40. K. Schulten, C.E. Swenberg, A. Weller, A biomagnetic sensory mechanism based on magnetic field modulated coherent electron spin motion. Z. Phys. Chem. 111, 1–5 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. A. Wendt, Quantum Mind And Social Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies and Department of MathematicsBrussels Free UniversityBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Brussels Free UniversityBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations