Skip to main content

Adaptive Water Governance: Summary and Synthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance

Abstract

The Adaptive Water Governance project was set up to examine how law, policy, and ecological dynamics influence the governance of regional-scale water-based social-ecological systems in the United States and Australia. With the onset of the Anthropocene, global and regional changes in biophysical inputs to these systems will challenge their capacity to respond while maintaining functions of water supply, flood control, hydropower production, water quality, and biodiversity in a time of aging infrastructure. At the heart of the capacity of these systems to respond to these challenges is their governance. Governance of these complex and dynamic social-environmental systems has moved beyond state-centric, legally bounded control to a complex mix of public/private self-organization. The resilience assessments of case studies and integrative scholarship led to this synthesis, which is presented in the form of three challenges to adaptive water governance. The first is to consider the role of government in removing barriers to adaptive governance by facilitating actions that take advantage of windows of opportunity and institutionalize the results of innovative solutions. The second challenge is to assure that in embracing these new approaches, society must continue to evaluates trade-offs. Such governance should assure that engagement of private and economic actors and the increase in governmental flexibility do not destabilize nor come at the expense of legitimacy, accountability, equity, and justice. Law in its role of establishing the structure and process of government and in placing bounds on the interaction of governmental entities with private actors is a key component in striking the balance between stability in government and adaptability of governance. The third challenge is to identify whether government might be given the authority to facilitate and participate in adaptive governance. Meeting these challenges will increase the capacity of these social-ecological systems to innovate, adapt, and learn their way into an uncertain future, by increasing participation in adaptive governance in ways that are legitimate, transparent, and just.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold CA (2010) Adaptive watershed planning and climate change. Environ Energy Law Policy J 5:417–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold CA (2014) Adaptive water law. Kansas Law Rev 62:101–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Gonzalez P, Head J, Polly PD, Lawing AM, Eronen JT, Ackerly DD, Alex K, Biber E, Blois J, Brashares J, Ceballos G, Davis E, Dietl GP, Dirzo R, Doremus H, Fortelius M, Greene HW, Hellmann J, Hickler T, Jackson ST, Kemp M, Koch PL, Kremen C, Lindsey EL, Looy C, Marshall CR, Mendenhall C, Mulch A, Mychajliw AM, Nowak C, Ramakrishnan U, Schnitzler J, Shrestha KD, Solari K, Stegner L, Stegner MA, Stenseth NC, Wake MH, Zhang Z (2017) Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems. Science 355:594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham LB (2009) Collaborative governance: emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. J Disput Resolut 2(2):1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham LB (2010) The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wisconsin Law Rev 2010(2):297–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarvis MH, Allan A, Hannah DM (2014) Water, resilience and the law: from general concepts and governance design principles to actionable mechanisms. Environ Sci Policy 43:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (1998) The 1997 water rights settlement between the State of Montana and the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy’s reservation – the role of community and of the trustee. UCLA J Environ Law Policy 16:255–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (2003) Water dispute resolution in the west: process elements for the modern era in basin-wide problem solving. Environ Law 33:949–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (2010) Transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty: resilience theory and the Columbia River Treaty. Univ Utah J Land Resour Environ Law 30:229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (2013) Legitimacy, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 18(1):3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art3/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B (2016) Water law reform in the face of climate change: learning from drought in Australia and the Western United States. Environ Plan Law J 33:372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens B, Chaffin BC (2016) Adaptive governance of water resources shared with indigenous peoples: the role of law. Special Issue: “Water Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, and Sustainable Water Resources Management.” Water 8(3):97. Eds Sharon BM, Eylon S, Susanna E. URL:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/3/97/html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig RK, Ruhl JB (2014) Designing administrative law for adaptive management. Vanderbilt Law Rev 67:1–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas MA, Young OR (eds) (2009) Governance for the environment: new perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman TL (2016) Thank you for being late: an optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn. Harper Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • National Civic League (2013) Making public participation legal. http://ncdd.org/rc/wp-content/uploads/MakingP2Legal.pdf

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Commun Psychol 41:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance (2007) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: a workbook for scientists., http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/resilience_assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenburg RA, Squires AL, Boll J, Brooks ES, Easton ZM, Steenhuis TS (2015) Agricultural BMP effectiveness and dominant hydrological flow paths: concepts and a review. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 51(2):305–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P (1996) The art of the long view: planning for the future in an uncertain world. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36:614–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, Molina M, Ramanathan V, Rockström J, Scheffer M, Schellnhuber HJ, Svedin U (2011) The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40:739–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Rev 2(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Salt D (2012) Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig AP (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9 (2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was developed in part under the Adaptive Water Governance project, funded by the US National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the US National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Cosens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cosens, B., Gunderson, L.H. (2018). Adaptive Water Governance: Summary and Synthesis. In: Cosens, B., Gunderson, L. (eds) Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics