Complicial Sets, an Overture

Chapter
Part of the MATRIX Book Series book series (MXBS, volume 1)

Abstract

The aim of these notes is to introduce the intuition motivating the notion of a complicial set, a simplicial set with certain marked “thin” simplices that witness a composition relation between the simplices on their boundary. By varying the marking conventions, complicial sets can be used to model (, n)-categories for each n ≥ 0, including n = . For this reason, complicial sets present a fertile setting for thinking about weak infinite dimensional categories in varying dimensions. This overture is presented in three acts: the first introducing simplicial models of higher categories; the second defining the Street nerve, which embeds strict ω-categories as strict complicial sets; and the third exploring an important saturation condition on the marked simplices in a complicial set and presenting a variety of model structures that capture their basic homotopy theory. Scattered throughout are suggested exercises for the reader who wants to engage more deeply with these notions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This document evolved from lecture notes written to accompany a 3-h mini course entitled “Weak Complicial Sets” delivered at the Higher Structures in Geometry and Physics workshop at the MATRIX Institute from June 6–7, 2016. The author wishes to thank Marcy Robertson and Philip Hackney, who organized the workshop, the MATRIX Institute for providing her with the opportunity to speak about this topic, and the NSF for financial support through the grant DMS-1551129. In addition, the author is grateful for personal conversations with the two world experts—Dominic Verity and Ross Street—who she consulted while preparing these notes. Finally, thanks are due to an eagle-eyed referee who made several cogent suggestions to improve the readability of this document.

References

  1. 1.
    Barwick, C., Schommer-Pries, C.: On the unicity of the homotopy theory of higher categories (2013). arXiv:1112.0040
  2. 2.
    Boardman, J.M., Vogt, R.M.: Homotopy Invariant Algebraic Structures on Topological Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 347. Springer, Berlin (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics: The Univalent Foundations Program, Institute for Advanced Study (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joyal, A.: Quasi-categories and Kan complexes. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 175(1–3), 207–222 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lurie, J.: Higher Topos Theory. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 170. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roberts, J.E.: Complicial sets. Handwritten manuscript (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Street, R.H.: The algebra of oriented simplexes. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 49, 283–335 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verity, D.: Weak complicial sets II, nerves of complicial Gray-categories. In: Davydov, A. (ed.) Categories in Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics (StreetFest). Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 431. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verity, D.: Complicial Sets, Characterising the Simplicial Nerves of Strict ω-Categories. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 905. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verity, D.: Weak complicial sets I, basic homotopy theory. Adv. Math. 219, 1081–1149 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations