Skip to main content

Advanced and Novel Methodology for Scientific Support on Decision-Making for Stone Cleaning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone

Abstract

The configuration of assessment criteria, methodology compilation, and the strategic planning of cleaning interventions applied on architectural surfaces of monuments are discussed in this chapter. This is accomplished by the use of an integrated decision-making system to assess cleaning interventions on stone architectural surfaces that present the characteristic decay pattern of black crusts. The system was developed by the incorporation of a fuzzy logic model into GIS enabling strategic planning through constant response in relation to the cleaning performance in a pointed spatial entity and environmental conditions. The developed, advanced, and novel methodology for scientific support on stone cleaning was demonstrated in practice on marble surfaces of a historic building in Athens, Greece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biscontin G, Zendri E, Bakolas A, Longega G, Driussi G. Moropoulou, A. Alcune considerazioni sullapulitura delle superfici architettoniche. Proc. of Symb. Scienza e Beni Culturali XI on Pulitura, Bressanone, Italy, 1995, pp. 625–631.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fassina V. General criteria for the cleaning of stone: theoretical aspects andmethodology of application. In: Zezza F, editor. Stone Material in Monuments: Diagnosis and Conservation; Scuola Universitaria C.U.M. Conservazione dei Monumenti; Heraklion, Crete. Bari: Mario Adda Editore; 1993. p. 126–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verges-Belmin V. Towards a definition of common evaluation criteria for the cleaning of porous building materials: a review. Sci Techn Cult Herit. 1996;5:69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moropoulou A, Delegou ET, Avdelidis NP, Koui M. Assessment of cleaning conservation interventions on architectural surfaces using an integrated methodology. In: Vandiver P, Goodway M, Druzik JR, Mass JL, editors. Materials issues in art and archaeology VI, vol. 712. Boston: Publishing Materials Research Society; 2002. p. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Revez MJ, Rodrigues JD. Incompatibility risk assessment procedure for the cleaning of built heritage. J Cult Herit. 2016;18:219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Senesi GS, Carrara I, Nicolodelli G, DMBP M, De Pascale O. Laser cleaning and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy applied in removing and characterizing black crusts from limestones of Castello Svevo, Bari, Italy: a case study. Microchem J. 2016;124:296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pozo-Antonio JS, Rivas T, López AJ, Fiorucci MP, Ramil A. Effectiveness of granite cleaning procedures in cultural heritage: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2016;571:1017–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gioventù E, Lorenzi PF, Villa F, Sorlini C, Rizzi M, Cagnini A, Griffo A, Cappitelli F. Comparing the bioremoval of black crusts on colored artistic lithotypes of the Cathedral of Florence with chemical and laser treatment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2011;65:832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iglesias-Campos MÁ, Prada Pérez JL, Fortes SG. Spot analysis to determine technical parameters of microblasting cleaning for building materials maintenance. Constr Build Mater. 2017;132:21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Appolonia L, Bertone A, Brunetto A, Vaudan D. The St Orso priory the comparison and testing of cleaning methods. J Cult Herit. 2000;(14):105–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaspar P, Hubbard C, McPhail D, Cummings AA. Topographical assessment and comparison of conservation cleaning treatments. J Cult Herit. 2003;4:294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pouli P, Zafiropoulos V, Balas C, Doganis Y, Galanos A. Laser cleaning of inorganic encrustation on excavated objects: evaluation of cleaning result by means of multi-spectral imaging. J Cult Herit. 2003;4:338–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pozo-Antonio JS, Ramil A, Rivas T, López AJ, Fiorucci MP. Effectiveness of chemical, mechanical and laser cleaning methods of sulphated black crusts developed on granite. Constr Build Mater. 2016;112:682–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guidetti V, Uminski M. Ion exchange resins for historic marble desulphatation and restoration. In: 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Venice, 2000, pp. 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verges-Belmin V, Dignard C. Laser yellowing: myth or reality. J Cult Herit. 2003;4:238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Siedel H, Hubrich K, Kusch HG, Wiedemann G, Neumeister K, Sobott R. Results of Laser cleaning on encrusted oolithic limestone of angel sculptures from the Cologne cathedral. In: 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Venice, 2000, pp. 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mossotti VG, Eldeeb AR, Fries TL, Coombs MJ, Naude VN, Soderberg L, Wheeler GS. The effect of selected cleaning techniques on Berkshire Lee marble; A scientific study at Philadelphia City Hall, U.S. Geological Survey, Prof. Paper 1635, Virginia 2002. http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/prof-paper/pp1635/. Last accessed date: October 2017.

  18. Delegou ET, Krokida M, Avdelidis NP, Moropoulou A. Assessment of cleaning interventions on marble surfaces using pulsed thermography. In: Paipetis AS, Matikas TE, Aggelis DG, Van Hemelrijck D, editors. Emerging technologies in non-destructive testing, vol. 2012. London: CRC Press. p. 31–6. ISBN: 978-0-415-62131-1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Delegou ET, Doulamis A, Moropoulou A. Decision making system on the assessment of cleaning interventions using combined fuzzy C-means and neural networks. Herit. Protect. From Document. to Interven. Proceeding of EU-CHIC International Conference on Cultural Heritage, Split, Croatia, May 29–June 1, 2012, pp. 191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stout KJ, Blunt LA. Application of 3-D topography to bio-engineering. J Int Mach Tools Manuf. 1995;35:219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amoroso G, Fassina V. Stone decay and conservation. New York: Elsevier; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigues JD. Defining, mapping and assessing deterioration patterns in stone conservation projects. J Cult Herit. 2015;16:267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larson JH, Madden C, Surtherland I. Ince Blundell: preservation of an important collection of classical sculpture. J Cult Herit. 2000;1:79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verges-Belmin V. Pseudomorphism of gypsum after calcite, a new textural feature accounting for the marble sulfation mechanism. Atm Environ. 1994;28(2):295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Skoulikidis T, Papakonstantinou-Ziotis P. Mechanism of sulfation by atmospheric SO2 of limestones and marbles of the ancient monuments and statues: I. Observations in situ (Acropolis) and measurements in the laboratory. Brit Cor J. 1981;16:63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Skoulikidis T, Charalambous D. Mechanism of sulfation by atmospheric SO2 of limestones and marbles of the ancient monuments and statues, II. Hypothesis concerning the rate determining steps in the process of sulphation, and its experimental confirmation. Brit Cor J. 1981;16:70–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Skoulikidis T, Papakonstantinou E, Galanos A, Doganis Y. Conservation of the west frieze. Study for the restoration of the Parthenon. 1995;3c:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maravelaki-Kalaiztaki P. Black crusts and patinas on Pentelic marble from the Parthenon and Erechtheum (acropolis, Athens): characterization and origin. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;532:187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fassina V. New findings on past treatments carried out on stone and marble monuments surfaces. Sci Total Environ. 1995;167:185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Young Μ, Uquhart D. Abrasive cleaning of sandstone buildings and monuments: an experimental investigation. In: Stone cleaning and the nature, soiling and decay mechanisms of stone: proceedings of the International conference held in Edinburgh, UK, 14–16 April 1992, pp.126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Avdelidis NP, Delegou ET, Almond DP, Moropoulou A. Surface roughness evaluation of marble by 3D laser profilometry and pulsed thermography. NDT & E Inter. 2004;37(7):571–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee JM, Steen WM. In-process surface monitoring for laser cleaning processes using a chromatic modulation technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2001;17:281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kapsalas P, Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P, Zervakis M, Delegou ET, Moropoulou A. Optical inspection for quantification of decay on stone surfaces. NDT & E Inter. 2007;40:2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moropoulou A, Delegou ET, Vlahakis V, Karaviti E. Digital processing of SEM images for the assessment of evaluation indexes of cleaning interventions on Pentelic marble surfaces. Mater Charact. 2007;58(11):1063–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Andrew C.Towards an aesthetic theory of building soiling. In: Stone Cleaning and the Nature, Soiling and Decay Mechanisms of Stone. Proceedings of the International Conference. 14–16 April 1992, London: Donhead, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brimblecombe P, Grossi CM. Aesthetic thresholds and blackening of stone buildings. SciTotal Environ. 2005;349(1):175–89.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fort R, Mingarro F, Lopez de Azcona MC, Rodriguez Blanco J. Chromatic parameters as performance indicators for stone cleaning techniques. Color Res Applic. 1999;25:442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Grossi CM, Esbert RM, Diaz Pache F, Alonso FJ. Soiling in building stones in urban environments. BuildEnviron. 2003;38:147–59.

    Google Scholar 

  39. EN 15886: Conservation of cultural property—Test methods—Color measurement of surfaces, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  40. ASTM D2244: Standard practice for calculation of color tolerances and color differences from instrumentally measured color coordinates, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Klein S, Fekrsanati F, Hildenhagen J, Dickmann K, Uphoff H, Marakis Y, Zafiropoulos V. Discolouration of marble during laser cleaning by Nd:YAG laser wavelengths. Appl Surf Sci. 2001;171:242–51.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Delegou ET, Avdelidis NP, Karaviti E, Moropoulou A. NDT&E techniques and SEM-EDS for the assessment of cleaning intervention on pentelic marble surfaces. J X-Ray Spectrom. 2008;37:435–43.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kouzeli K. Black crust removal methods in use. Their effects on pentelic marble surfaces. 7th Int Congr Deterior Conserv Stone Lisbon. 1992;3:1147–55.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moropoulou Α, Kefalonitou S. Efficiency and counter effects of cleaning treatment on limestone surfaces—investigation of Corfu venetian fortress. Build Environ. 2002;37:1181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Inkpen RJ, Fontana D, Collier P. Mapping decay: integrating scales of weathering within GIS. Earth Surf Proc Landf. 2001;26:885–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Salonia P, buildings NAH, decay t. Data recording, analyzing and transferring in an ITC environment. Int Arc of the Photogram Rem Sens Spatial Inf Sc. 2002;XXXIV(5/W12):302–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Inkpen R, Duane B, Burdett J, Yates T. Assessing stone degradation using an integrated database and geographical information system (GIS). Environ Geol. 2008;56:789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Delegou ET, Tsilimantou E, Oikonomopoulou E, Sayas J, Ioannidis C, Moropoulou A. Mapping of building materials and conservation interventions using GIS: the case of Sarantapicho acropolis and Erimokastro acropolis in Rhodes. Inter J Herit Digit Era. 2013;2(4):631–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mamdani EH, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man-Mach Stud. 1975;7(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vakalis D, Sarimveis H, Kiranoudis CT, Alexandridis A, Bafas GV. A GIS based operational system for wild-land fire crisis management I. Mathematical modeling and simulation. Appl Math Model. 2004;28:389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Klir JG, Yuan B. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kazaras K, Konstandinidou M, Nivolianitou Z. Enhancing road tunnel risk assessment with a fuzzy system based on the CREAM methodology. Chem Engin Trans. 2013;31:349–54.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Keramitsoglou I, Cartalis C, Kiranoudis CT. Automatic identification of oil spills on satellite images. Environ Model Softw. 2006;21(5):640–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Konstandinidou M, Nivolianitou Z, Kiranoudis C, Markatos NC. A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis. Reliab Engin System Safet. 2006;91(6):706–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zadeh LA. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;3:28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Driankov D, Hellendoorn H, Reinfrank M. An introduction to Fuzzy Control. Berlin: Springer; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Mamdani EH. Application of fuzzy algorithms for simple dynamic plants. Proc Electr Engin IEE. 1974;121(12):1585–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Moropoulou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Delegou, E.T., Ntoutsi, I., Kiranoudis, C.T., Sayas, J., Moropoulou, A. (2018). Advanced and Novel Methodology for Scientific Support on Decision-Making for Stone Cleaning. In: Hosseini, M., Karapanagiotis, I. (eds) Advanced Materials for the Conservation of Stone. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72260-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics