Skip to main content

Modeling of Argon Gas Behavior in Continuous Casting of Steel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CFD Modeling and Simulation in Materials Processing 2018 (TMS 2018)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In continuous casting of steel, argon gas injection is a popular method to reduce nozzle clogging. Multiphase turbulent flow of molten steel with argon gas through complicated-geometry nozzles increases the complexity of the flow dynamics. In this study, these complex multiphase turbulent flow behaviors are simulated in a lab-scale continuous caster using a new hybrid model that involves a Eulerian-Eulerian (EE) model coupled simultaneously with a Discrete Phase Model (DPM). The complex behavior of the argon gas including formation of gas pockets, intermittent shearing off of the gas pockets, volumetric expansion, coalescence and breakup of bubbles, and transport of the bubbles in both the nozzle and mold are all simulated. The model is validated with measurements on a benchmark experiment of liquid-metal argon flow in a laboratory-scale system. This hybrid model is a promising tool to estimate realistic bubble size distributions and multiphase flow in a real caster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

\( A_{int} \) :

Interface area of gas pocket, \( d \): diameter of a bubble, \( \varvec{F} \): force, \( \varvec{g} \): gravity

\( m_{b} \) :

Mass of a bubble, N: total number of bubble created by shearing off \( p \): pressure

R:

Random number between 0 and 1, r: bubble radius, \( t \): time, \( \varvec{u} \): velocity field, \( u \): velocity magnitude, \( \bar{u}_{\lambda } \): eddy velocity, V: volume, \( \varvec{v}_{\varvec{i}} \): velocity of ith DPM bubble, \( \varvec{v}_{\varvec{i}} ' \): velocity of i-th DPM bubble after collision

\( We_{c} \) :

Critical Weber number, \( \varvec{x}_{\varvec{i}} \): ith DPM bubble velocity, \( \alpha \): EE volume fraction field

\( \alpha^{ *} \) :

Approximated volume fraction field, \( \mu \): viscosity, \( \rho \): density, \( \upvarepsilon \): liquid turbulence dissipation rate

\( \sigma \) :

Surface tension coefficient, \( \delta_{g}^{ * } \): sheared off gas layer thickness

\( \mathop \sum \limits_{j = 1}^{N} \) :

Summation of sheared off bubbles created in one shearing off process

\( k\,{\text{and}}\,{\text{q}} \) :

Arbitrary phase (gas or liquid), B: buoyancy, D: drag, g: gas, l: liquid, lf: liquid film

N:

Normal, t: tangent, new: new position, old: old position, P: pressure gradient, p: parent bubble

SO:

Sheared off, V: virtual mass, 1: smaller bubble in a pair, 2: larger bubble in a pair

3:

Created bubble by coalescence

References

  1. Liu Z, Qi F, Li B, Jiang M (2014) Multiple size group modeling of polydispersed bubbly flow in the mold: an analysis of turbulence and interfacial force models. Metall Mater Trans B 46:933–952

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jin K, Thomas BG, Ruan X (2015) Modeling and measurements of multiphase flow and bubble entrapment in steel continuous casting. Metall Mater Trans B 47:548–565

    Google Scholar 

  3. Timmel K, Shevchenko N, Röder M, Anderhuber M, Gardin P, Eckert S, Gerbeth G (2014) Visualization of liquid metal two-phase flows in a physical model of the continuous casting process of steel. Metall Mater Trans B 46:700–710

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harlow FH, Amsden AA (1975) Numerical calculation of multiphase fluid flow. J Comput Phys 17:19–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Riley JJ (1974) Diffusion experiments with numerically integrated isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 17(2): 292–297

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang H, Vanka SP, Thomas BG (2017) Hybrid eulerian eulerian discrete phase model of turbulent bubbly flow. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, ASME. Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomiyama A, Kataoka I, Zun I, Sakaguchi T (1998) Drag coefficients of single bubbles under normal and micro gravity conditions. JSME Int J Ser B 41:472–479

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang H, Thomas BG (2017) Multiphase flow and bubble size distribution in continuous casters using a hybrid EEDPM model. STEELSIM 2017, Quingdao, China

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hesketh RP, Etchells AW, Russell TWF (1991) Experimental observations of bubble breakage in turbulent flow. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:835–841

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo H, Svendsen HF (1996) Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. AIChE J 42:1225–1233

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang T, Wang J, Jin Y (2003) A novel theoretical breakup kernel function for bubbles/droplets in a turbulent flow. Chem Eng Sci 58:4629–4637

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prince MJ, Blanch HW (1990) Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns. AIChE J 36:1485–1499

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liao Y, Lucas D (2009) A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chem Eng Sci 64:3389–3406

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans GM, Jameson GJ, Atkinson BW (1992) Prediction of the bubble size generated by a plunging liquid jet bubble column. Chem Eng Sci 47:3265–3272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CMMI 15-63553) and the Continuous Casting Consortium, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunjin Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yang, H., Vanka, S.P., Thomas, B.G. (2018). Modeling of Argon Gas Behavior in Continuous Casting of Steel. In: Nastac, L., Pericleous, K., Sabau, A., Zhang, L., Thomas, B. (eds) CFD Modeling and Simulation in Materials Processing 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72059-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics