Advertisement

Lumbar Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Corpectomy

  • Gabriel Tender
  • Durga R. Sure
  • Yasser Badr
  • Anthony Digiorgio
  • Clifford Crutcher
Chapter

Abstract

The lumbar retroperitoneal transpsoas corpectomy technique is probably the most difficult minimally invasive technique to learn. The approach is similar to the discectomy technique, but has to be extended to span the two discs, above and below the pathologic vertebral body. Supplemental fixation with either a lateral plate or posterior pedicle screws is recommended.

Supplementary material

Video 13.1

L4 corpectomy in a patient with L2 and L4 fractures. The L2 fracture was treated conservatively (MP4 39663 kb)

Video 13.2

L4 corpectomy with abdominal wall muscles dissection (MP4 43712 kb)

Video 13.3

L1 corpectomy (MP4 82643 kb)

Video 13.4

L3 corpectomy. The posterior pedicle screws were already placed during a previous operation (MP4 23730 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chou D, Lu DC. Mini-open transpedicular corpectomies with expandable cage reconstruction. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:71–7.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.10.spine091009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu DC, Lau D, Lee JG, Chou D. The transpedicular approach compared with the anterior approach: an analysis of 80 thoracolumbar corpectomies. J Neurosurgery Spine. 2010;12:583–91.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.1.spine09292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith ZA, Li Z, Chen NF, Raphael D, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive lateral extracavitary corpectomy: cadaveric evaluation model and report of 3 clinical cases. J Neurosurgery Spine. 2012;16:463–70.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.2.SPINE11128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baaj AA, et al. Complications of the mini-open anterolateral approach to the thoracolumbar spine. J Clini Neurosci. 2012;19:1265–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uribe JS, Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Vale FL. Minimally invasive lateral retropleural thoracolumbar approach: cadaveric feasibility study and report of 4 clinical cases. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:32–9; discussion 39.  https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207b6cb.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rihn JA, et al. A review of the TLICS system: a novel, user-friendly thoracolumbar trauma classification system. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:461–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vaccaro AR, et al. The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:209–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tender GC, Serban D. Genitofemoral nerve protection during the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:192–6; discussion 196-197.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000431473.49042.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pekmezci M, et al. Can a novel rectangular footplate provide higher resistance to subsidence than circular footplates? An ex vivo biomechanical study. Spine. 2012;37:E1177–81.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182647c0b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guerin P, et al. The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34:151–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0881-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pekmezci M, et al. Comparison of expandable and fixed interbody cages in a human cadaver corpectomy model, part I: endplate force characteristics. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:321–6.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.7.spine12171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS. Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12755.
  14. 14.
    Banagan K, Gelb D, Poelstra K, Ludwig S. Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study. Spine. 2011;36:E687–91.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5911.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:139–44.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.10.SPI08479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dakwar E, Ahmadian A, Uribe JS. The anatomical relationship of the diaphragm to the thoracolumbar junction during the minimally invasive lateral extracoelomic (retropleural/retroperitoneal) approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:359–64.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.12.SPINE11626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kepler CK, Bogner EA, Herzog RJ, Huang RC. Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:550–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1593-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu S, et al. Clinical anatomy and 3D virtual reconstruction of the lumbar plexus with respect to lumbar surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:76.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:260–6.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09766.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Tender
    • 1
  • Durga R. Sure
    • 2
  • Yasser Badr
    • 3
  • Anthony Digiorgio
    • 4
  • Clifford Crutcher
    • 4
  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Essentia HealthDuluthUSA
  3. 3.Badr Brain and SpineLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations