Advertisement

Percutaneous Facet Screws

  • Malcolm Daniel Eggart
  • Silvia Gesheva
  • Clifford Crutcher
  • Gabriel Tender
Chapter

Abstract

This technique is useful mostly at L4–5 and L5–S1 as supplemental fixation after an anterior approach (ALIF or AxiaLIF) and has the advantage of a minimal midline skin incision and soft tissue disruption. While biomechanically not as strong as the pedicle screw/rod constructs, the facet screws are mostly designed to block rotation.

Supplementary material

Video 11.1

Percutaneous L5–S1 facet screws supplementing an AxiaLIF (MP4 20949 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwala A, Bucklen B, Muzumdar A, Moldavsky M, Khalil S. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27:64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Best NM, Sasso RC. Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000179244.76244.5e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buttermann GR, Thorson TM, Mullin WJ. Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:347–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2999-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrara LA, et al. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling. Spine. 2003;28:1226–34.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000065485.46539.17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhan Y, Tian D. Do translaminar facet screws have the same stability as pedicle screws in two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion? A biomechanical study. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22:630–3.  https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.5825-12.0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Awad BI, et al. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation versus unilateral pedicle and contralateral facet screws for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical outcomes and cost analysis. Global Spine J. 2013;3:225–30.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cao Y, et al. The combined use of unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet joint screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:2607–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4120-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsiang J, Yu K, He Y. Minimally invasive one-level lumbar decompression and fusion surgery with posterior instrumentation using a combination of pedicle screw fixation and transpedicular facet screw construct. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:125.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.119007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jang JS, Lee SH. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:218–23.  https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.3.3.0218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo B, et al. Biomechanical study of unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:657–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm Daniel Eggart
    • 1
  • Silvia Gesheva
    • 2
  • Clifford Crutcher
    • 2
  • Gabriel Tender
    • 3
  1. 1.MUSC Health Neurosciences at Tidelands HealthMurrells InletUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Louisiana State UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations