Advertisement

Minimun Decency as Ordinary and Proportionate Healthcare Provision: A Christian Response to Ruiping Fan

  • Peter Au-Yeung
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Global Bioethics book series (AGBIO, volume 9)

Abstract

The endorsement of the first part of Article 14 by Confucianism in that governments should promote health and social developments of its people would find resonance in Catholic social teachings which promotes the exercise of authority as a service. The centrality of the family in society is similarly emphasized by both religions. The right to health may imply a radical egalitarian approach rejected by Confucianism. This is echoed in the Catholic teaching of ordinary versus extraordinary means of therapy. The Catholic vision of equality in the dignity of human persons incorporates a need for service of love (caritas), which expresses itself as love of neighbor. Although Confucianism does not directly address the matter of human solidarity, the codification of obligations between different members of society maintains a structure for maintaining such solidarity. Finally an exploration of ordinary and proportionate means of therapy in the context of current scientific and technological advances may help to set an appropriate minimal decent standard of healthcare.

Keywords

Decent minimum healthcare Human solidarity Ordinary means Proportionate means Radical egalitarianism Right to health Service conception of government 

References

  1. Arrhenius, Gustaf, Jesper Ryberg, and Torbjörn Tännsjö. 2014. “The repugnant conclusion,” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/repugnant-conclusion/.
  2. Catechism of the Catholic Church, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Citta del Vaticano. 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Declaration on Euthanasia, Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith. 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Deus Caritas Est, Benedict XVI. 2005.Google Scholar
  5. The Book of Rites (English version: “Sacred books of the East, volume 28, part 4: The Li Ki,” James Legge, 1885).Google Scholar
  6. UNESCO. 2010. The Report of the International Bioethics of UNESCO on Social Responsibility and Health.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Au-Yeung
    • 1
  1. 1.Diocesan Committee on BioethicsCatholic Diocese of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations