Protists of Arctic Sea Ice
Sea ice not only shapes the global climate but is also an important background for a complicated ecosystem that is closely related to the littoral benthic ecosystem. This similarity is the reason why this formation is usually referred to as an “inverted bottom.” In the deep central part of the Arctic Basin (which is 47% of its overall surface area), it is estimated that approximately 50% of the primary production comes from autotrophic protists (sympagic) related to sea ice. Global warming has caused changes in the range and time of sea ice occurrence, and the existence time of sea ice assemblages is also changing. After 173 years of ice-related microalgae studies, the appearance of 1027 taxa closely related to sea ice has been recorded.
KeywordsProtists Arctic Sea ice Primary production
The team of authors has participated in research on ice protists in international programmes such as NOW (North Water Polynya—1998), ‘Marinok’ (Project on Ice Margin Zone on Barents Sea)—1999–2000, CASES (Canadian Arctic Shelf Exchange Study)—2003/4, CLEOPATRA (Climate effects on planktonic food quality and trophic transfer in Arctic Marginal Ice Zones) 2007/2008, Resolute 2010/11 and have participated in ArcticNet (grant NR695/N-ARCTICNET/2010/0).
This publication was financed by funds from the Leading National Research Centre (KNOW) received by the Centre for Polar Studies for the period 2014–2018.
- Assessment, Arctic marine shipping (2009) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report, Arctic CouncilGoogle Scholar
- Bartsch A (1989) Sea ice algae of the Weddell Sea (Antarctica): species composition, biomass, and ecophysiology of selected species. Ber Polarforsch 63:1–110Google Scholar
- Comiso J (2010) Satellite remote sensing techniques, Polar Oceans from Space, pp 73–111Google Scholar
- Ehrenberg CG (1841) 1853 Einen Nachtrag zu dem Vortrage uber Verbreitung und Einfluss des microscopischen Lebens in Sud-und Nord-Amerika, Acad. Wiss. Berlin Monatsber, pp. 220Google Scholar
- Jerlov NG (1968) Optical oceanography. Elsevier Pub. Co, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Krembs C, Gradinger R, Spindler M (2000) Implications of brine channel geometry and surface area for the interaction of sympagic organisms in Arctic sea ice 243(1):55–80Google Scholar
- Kwok R, Rothrock DA (2009) Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008. Geophy Res Lett 36Google Scholar
- Maykut GA (1985) The Ice Environment. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, pp 21–82Google Scholar
- Melnikov IA (1997) The Arctic sea ice ecosystem. Antarctic Sci 9(4):457–458Google Scholar
- Parker LV, Sullivan CW, Forest TW, Ackley SF (1985) Ice nucleation activity of antarctic marine microorganisms. Antarctic J 20:126–127Google Scholar
- Schünemann H (2004) Studies on the Arctic pack-ice habitat and sympagic meiofauna: seasonal and regional variabilities. PhD Thesis. Christian-Albrechts Universität KielGoogle Scholar
- Spindler M (1996) On the salinity tolerance of the planktonic foraminifera, pp 85–91Google Scholar
- Thomas DN, Dieckmann GS (2000) Sea Ice, Wiley, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- Weeks W (2010) On sea ice, University of Alaska Press, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
- Wiktor J (2015) Morskie pierwotniaki Arktyki Rozprawy i Monografie 24. Institut of Oceanology Polish Academy of Science, Sopot, pp 177. in polish Google Scholar