Advertisement

Against Professionalizing Leadership: The Roles of Self-Formation and Practical Wisdom in Leadership

  • Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen
  • Marita Svane
Chapter

Abstract

Based on the concepts self-formation and phronesis (practical wisdom), this chapter argues against professionalizing leadership. Professionalization implies rules, guidelines, procedures and accreditation standards in relation to contents, curricula and the pedagogy of education. It thus misconceives the role of leadership education to be only a question of acquiring epistemic (rational and universal) knowledge and skills while it fails to acknowledge technê as craft and art, and local and situated awareness and sensitivity. Practical wisdom involves all dimensions. Leadership education is important because of its potential to nurture a creative, critical and responsible relation to the world. Leadership thus requires a practice-based educational program and a “free space” for experimentation, reflection and self-formation, which is inconsistent with turning leadership into a profession.

Keywords

Self-formation Phronesis Leadership education Episteme Technê Professionalization of leadership 

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics: Oxford World’s Classics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Walter. 1999. “The Storyteller: Reflections on the Work of Nikolai Leskov.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, 83–107. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  5. Boje, David M., Usha Haley, and Rohny Saylors. 2016. “Antenarratives of Organizational Change: The Microstoria of Burger King’s Storytelling in Space, Time and Strategic Context.” Human Relations 69(2):391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chia, Robert, and Robin Holt. 2006. “Strategy as Practical Coping: A Heideggerian Perspective.” Organization Studies 27(5):635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chia, Robert, and Andreas Rasche. 2015. “Epistemological Alternatives for Researching Strategy-As-Practice: Building and Dwelling Worldviews.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, edited by Damon Golsorkhi, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara, 44–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunliffe, Ann L. 2002. “Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning.” Management Learning 33(1):35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunliffe, Ann L. 2003. “Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities.” Human Relations 56(8):983–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunliffe, Ann L., and Chris Coupland. 2011. “From Hero to Villain to Hero: Making Experience Sensible Through Embodied Narrative Sensemaking.” Human Relations 65(1):63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 2013. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Drucker, Peter F. 1974. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, Richard. 2008. “Actively Seeking Subjects.” In Foucault and Lifelong Learning: Governing the Subject, edited by Andreas Fejes and Katherine Nicoll, 21–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Eisner, Elliot W. 2002. “From Episteme to Phronesis to Artistry in the Study and Improvement of Teaching.” Teacher and Teaching Education 18:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 1997. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Michel Foucault: Ethics—Subjectivity and Truth, edited by Paul Rabinow, 281–302. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, Michel. 2000. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault—Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 Volume 3, edited by James D. Faubion, 326–48. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, Paolo. 1996. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, Linda A. 2003. Becoming a Manager: How New Managers Master the Challenges of Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ibarra-Colado, Eduardo, Stewart R. Clegg, Carl Rhodes, and Martin Kornberger. 2006. “The Ethics of Managerial Subjectivity.” Journal of Business Ethics 64:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jørgensen, Kenneth M., Anete M. Camille Strand, and Anja O. Thomassen. 2012. “Conceptual Bases of Problem-Based Learning.” In Global Perspectives on College and University Teaching, edited by James Groccia, Mohammed A.T. Alsudairi, and William Buskist, 440–56. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkeby, Ole F. 2009. “Phronesis as the Sense of the Event.” International Journal of Action Research 5(1):68–113.Google Scholar
  22. Kotter, John P. 1990. “What Leaders Really Do.” Harvard Business Review 68(3):103–11.Google Scholar
  23. Mol, Annemarie. 1999. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions.” Sociological Review 47(1):74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nonaka, Ikujiro, Robert Chia, Robin Holt, and Vesa Peltokorpi. 2014. “Wisdom, Management and Organization.” Management Learning 45(4):365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pålshaugen, Øjvind. 2001. The End of Organization Theory? Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  26. Shotter, John, and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2014. “Performing Phronesis: On the Way to Engaged Judgment.” Management Learning 45(4):377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spector, Bert A. 2016. Discourse on Leadership: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Todd, Sharon. 2009. Toward an Imperfect Education: Facing Humanity, Rethinking Cosmopolitanism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Townley, Barbara. 1995. “‘Know Thyself’: Self-Awareness, Self-Formation and Managing.” Organization 2(2):271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen
    • 1
  • Marita Svane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations