Advertisement

Why Universities Should Give Bachelor Programs in Leadership

  • Anders Örtenblad
Chapter

Abstracts

It is argued that higher education institutions around the world should offer bachelor programs in leadership. Arguments for this which are put forward in the chapter include that practicing leadership is about dealing with and taking care of people, something that those taking on leading positions need to be well prepared for through higher education, and that there currently are too many examples of leaders who not take the responsibility that could be expected from them, something that also could be improved via the installation of bachelor programs in leadership. It is argued that bachelor programs in leadership should include a sound mix of theory and practice, on which basis the students would be given opportunities to develop their own, personal “leadership idea”.

Keywords

Leadership Leadership education Bachelor degree Leadership idea Ethics Experience-based learning Higher education Bad leadership 

References

  1. Alvesson, Mats, Martin Blom, and Stefan Sveningsson. 2017. Reflexive Leadership: Organising in an Imperfect World. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Djelic, Marie-Laure. 1998. Exporting the American Model: The Post-war Transformation of European Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2002. “Exporting the American Model: Historical Roots of Globalization.” In Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective, edited by J. Rogers Hollingsworth, Karl H. Müller, and Ellen Jane Hollingsworth (with assistance of David Gear), 351–79. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Harvey, Paul, Jason Stoner, Wayne Hochwarter, and Charles Kacmar. 2007. “Coping with Abusive Supervision: The Neutralizing Effects of Ingratiation and Positive Affect on Negative Employee Outcomes.” The Leadership Quarterly 18(3):264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jennings, Marianne M. 2015. “When the CEO ‘Didn’t Know’.” Corporate Finance Review 20(3):32–5.Google Scholar
  6. Kellerman, Barbara. 2004. Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lipman-Blumen, Jean. 2004. The Allure of Toxic Leaders: Why We Follow Destructive Bosses and Corrupt Politicians – And How We Can Survive Them. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lund, Anne K. 2016. Leader Legitimacy – A Matter of Education? Leading Highly Specialised People – A Legitimacy Challenge. Development and Learning in Organizations 30(6):20–3.Google Scholar
  9. Mazza, Carmelo, Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, and Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen. 2005. “European Constructions of an American Model: Developments of Four MBA Programmes.” Management Learning 36(4):471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Russell, Robert F., and A. Gregory Stone. 2002. “A Review of Servant Leadership Attributes: Developing a Practical Model.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 23(3):145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stein, Mark. 2013. “When Does Narcissistic Leadership Become Problematic? Dick Fuld at Lehman Brothers.” Journal of Management Inquiry 22(3):282–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stone, Glenn, Cynthia Conley, and Yibing Luo. 2014. “Alternative Perspectives on Leadership: Integrating Transformational Leadership with Confucian Philosophy.” Open Journal of Leadership 3:30–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2014.32004. Accessed on September 28, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, Li, and Robin S. Snell. 2013. “A Case Study of Ethical Issues at Gucci in Shenzhen, China.” Asian Journal of Business Ethics 2(2):173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Western, Simon. 2014. “Autonomist Leadership in Leaderless Movements: Anarchists Leading the Way.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 14(4):673–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Örtenblad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesNord UniversityBodøNorway

Personalised recommendations