Advertisement

“As the Twig Is Bent, so the Tree Shall Grow”: Developing Strategic Intuition Through Reflective Practices in Bachelor Programs in Leadership Studies

  • G. K. Cunningham
  • Richard M. Meinhart
Chapter

Abstract

Large, stratified hierarchies require different models of leadership to produce desired outcomes, especially at strategic levels. To many senior practitioners, strategic leadership depends on intuitive judgment. Indeed, the technology-accelerated pace of the current senior-level leadership environment, and the array of unstructured problems senior leaders face, may not support empirical and evidenced-based processes. Cunningham and Meinhart argue that intuition is experiential, tacit knowledge that can be enhanced by self-reflective techniques. Reflection should be adopted early and strengthened by foundational education in the language and concepts of leadership. They suggest specific reflective practices, inculcated at the baccalaureate level, which can be taught and employed to focus experiential learning as leaders rise through an organization.

Keywords

Analysis Baccalaureate Curriculum Dialogue Education Intuition Leadership Judgment Learning Reflection Strategic Thinking 

References

  1. Anderson, Lorin W., and David R. Krathwohl, eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Lesley Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Barnard, Chester I. 1939/1968. The Functions of an Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright, Talula. 2004. Developing Your Intuition: A Guide to Reflective Practice. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham, G.K. 2012. “A Phenomenological Study of the Use of Intuition Among Senior Military Commanders.” PhD diss., Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  5. Dane, Erik, and Michael G. Pratt. 2007. “Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision Making.” Academy of Management Review 32(1):33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daudelin, Marilyn Wood. 1996. “Learning from Experience Through Reflection.” Organizational Dynamics 24(3):36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duggan, William. 2005. Coup de’oeil: Strategic Intuition in Army Planning. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hedberg, Patricia Raber. 2009. “Learning Through Reflective Classroom Practice: Applications to Educate the Reflective Manager.” Journal of Management Education 31(1):14–16.Google Scholar
  9. Jaques, Elliott. 1986. “The Development of Intellectual Capacity: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory.” Journal of Applied Behavior Science 22(4):361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jung, Carl Gustav. 1921/1938. Psychological Types, or the Psychology of Individuals. Translated by H. Goodwin Baynes. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Meinhart, Richard M. 2012. “Reflection and Learning.” Unpublished academic paper. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.Google Scholar
  12. Mitchell, J. Robert, Paul N. Friga, and Ronald Mitchell. 2005. “Untangling the Intuition Mess: Intuition as a Construct in Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(6):653–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sadler-Smith, Eugene. 2008. Inside Intuition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Simon, Herbert A. 1945/1997. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (4th edn.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sinclair, Marta, and Neal M. Ashkanasy. 2005. “Intuition: Myth or Decision-Making Tool?” Management Learning 36(3):353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson, Arthur L., and Elizabeth R. Hayes, eds. 2000. Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. K. Cunningham
    • 1
  • Richard M. Meinhart
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army War CollegeCarlisleUSA

Personalised recommendations