Advertisement

Identifying Affordances for Modelling Second-Order Emergent Phenomena with the \(\mathcal {WIT}\) Framework

  • Pablo Noriega
  • Jordi Sabater-Mir
  • Harko Verhagen
  • Julian Padget
  • Mark d’Inverno
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10643)

Abstract

We explore a means to understand second order emergent social phenomena (EP2), that is, phenomena that involve groups of agents who reason and decide, specifically, about actions – theirs or others’ – that may affect the social environment where they interact with other agents. We propose to model such phenomena as socio-cognitive technical systems that involve, on one hand, agents that are imbued with social rationality (thus socio-cognitive) and, on the other hand, a social space where they interact. For that modelling we rely on the WIT framework that defines such socio-cognitive technical systems as a trinity of aspects (the social phenomenon, the simulation model and the implementation of that model). In this paper we centre our attention on the use of affordances as a useful construct to model socio-cognitive technical systems. We use the example of reputation emergence to illustrate our proposal.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by project MILESS (Ministerio de economía y competitividad - TIN2013-45039-P - financed by FEDER) and SCAR project (Ministerio de economía y competitividad - TIN2015-70819-ERC). We also thank the Generalitat de Catalunya (Grant: 2014 SGR 118).

References

  1. 1.
    Aldewereld, H., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Padget, J. (eds.): Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems. LGTS, vol. 30. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33570-4 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive architecture and contents for social structures and interactions. In: Sun, R. (ed.) Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction, pp. 355–390. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelfranchi, C.: InMind and OutMind; Societal Order Cognition and Self-Organization: The role of MAS, May 2013. http://www.slideshare.net/sleeplessgreenideas/castelfranchi-aamas13-v2. Invited talk for the IFAAMAS “Influential Paper Award”. AAMAS 2013. Saint Paul, Minn. US
  4. 4.
    Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conte, R., Andrighetto, G., Campennì, M., Paolucci, M.: Emergent and immergent effects in complex social systems. In: Proceedings of AAAI Symposium, Social and Organizational Aspects of Intelligence, pp. 8–11 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennett, D.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Communicating open systems. Artif. Intell. 186, 38–94 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epstein, J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esteva, M., Padget, J., Sierra, C.: Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 348–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45448-9_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harbers, M., van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.-J.: Modeling agents with a theory of mind: theory-theory versus simulation theory. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 10(3), 331–343 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, A.J.I., Artikis, A., Pitt, J.: The design of intelligent socio-technical systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 39(1), 5–20 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noriega, P., de Jonge, D.: Electronic institutions: the EI/EIDE framework. In: Aldewereld, H., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Padget, J. (eds.) Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems. LGTS, vol. 30, pp. 47–76. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33570-4_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noriega, P., Padget, J., Verhagen, H., d’Inverno, M.: Towards a framework for socio-cognitive technical systems. In: Ghose, A., Oren, N., Telang, P., Thangarajah, J. (eds.) COIN 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9372, pp. 164–181. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noriega, P., Verhagen, H., d’Inverno, M., Padget, J.: A manifesto for conscientious design of hybrid online social systems. In: Cranefield, S., Mahmoud, S., Padget, J., Rocha, A.P. (eds.) COIN-2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10315, pp. 60–78. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66595-5_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman, D.A.: Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions 6(3), 38–43 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Padget, J., ElDeen Elakehal, E., Li, T., De Vos, M.: InstAL: an institutional action language. In: Aldewereld, H., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Padget, J. (eds.) Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems. LGTS, vol. 30, pp. 101–124. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33570-4_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pinyol, I., Paolucci, M., Sabater-Mir, J., Conte, R.: Beyond accuracy. reputation for partner selection with lies and retaliation. In: Antunes, L., Paolucci, M., Norling, E. (eds.) MABS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5003, pp. 128–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70916-9_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pinyol, I., Sabater-Mir, J.: Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 40(1), 1–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruben, D.H.: The existence of social entities. Philos. Q. 32, 295–310 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Searle, J.R.: What is an institution? J. Inst. Econ. 1(01), 1–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, R.: Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philos. Psychol. 17(3), 341–373 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verhagen, H., Noriega, P., d’Inverno, M.: Towards a design framework for controlled hybrid social games. In: Verhagen, H., Noriega, P., Balke, T., de Vos, M. (eds.) Social Coordination: Principles, Artefacts and Theories (SOCIAL.PATH), AISB 2013 Convention Proceedings, Exeter, UK, 3 April 2013, pp. 83–87. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Noriega
    • 1
  • Jordi Sabater-Mir
    • 1
  • Harko Verhagen
    • 2
  • Julian Padget
    • 3
  • Mark d’Inverno
    • 4
  1. 1.IIIA-CSICBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK
  4. 4.GoldsmithsUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations