Advertisement

Organizational Cultures in the Military

  • Joseph Soeters
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

In this chapter the basic elements of organizational cultures in the military are analyzed, assuming that the military organization is too differentiated to speak about one military culture. These basic elements refer to the community life, hierarchy and rules, discipline, the Janusface character of the organization, and a certain assessment-aversion. There is variation in military organizational cultures with respect to • time-bound developments • between national armed forces • between the army, the air force, the navy and the special forces as well as • between regular soldiers, reservists and civilians. Organizational cultures are continuously in movement, implying that there are numerous challenges in the near future. The emphasis in the chapter is on the impact of military organizational cultures on operational conduct and effectiveness in action.

Keywords

Culture Subcultures Developments National Services Civilians Reservists 

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (2013). Understanding organizational culture (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. L. (2015). The unravelling in a failing state, an anti-islamist general mounts a divisive campaign. The New Yorker. February 23, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, S. (2015). Abolish West Point—And the other service academies, too. Washington Post, January 23, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S. (2014). What about Mozart? What about Murder? Reasoning from Cases. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beeres, R. J., & Bogers, M. P. (2012). Ranking the performance of European armed forces. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bierly, P. E., III, & Spender, J. C. (1995). Culture and high reliability organizations: The case of the nuclear submarine. Journal of Management, 21(4), 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brocades Zaalberg, T., & ten Zaalberg, A. (2012). A gentle occupation: Unravelling the Dutch approach in Iraq: 2003–2005. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 23(1), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Builder, C. (1989). The masks of war. American military styles in strategy and analysis. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burk, J. (2008). Military culture. In L. Kurtz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of violence, peace & conflict (pp. 1242–1256). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catignani, S. (2012). “Getting COIN’ at the tactical level in Afghanistan: Reassessing counter-insurgency adaptation in the British army. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(4), 513–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catino, M., & Patriotta, G. (2013). Learning from errors: Cognition, emotions and safety culture in the Italian Air Force. Organization Studies, 34(4), 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandrasekaran, R. (2007). Imperial life in the Emerald city. Inside Iraq’s green zone. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Chandrasekaran, R. (2012). Little America. The war within the war for Afghanistan. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, E. E. A., Ejsmond-Frey, R., Knight, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). Rowers’ high: Behavioral synchronicity is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biology Letters, 6, 106–108.Google Scholar
  16. Cohn, L. P. (2015). How much is enough? Strategic Studies Quarterly, Fall, 47–61.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, A. K. (1948). Bureaucratic patterns in the Navy officer corps. Social Forces, 27(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diken, B., & Bagge Laustsen, C. (2005). The culture of exception. Sociology facing the camp, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Dimaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(April), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ender, M. G. (2009). American soldiers in Iraq. McSoldiers or innovative professionals? London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Eriksson Baaz, M., & Verweijen, J. (2013). The volatility of a half-cooked bouillabaisse: Rebel-military integration and conflict dynamics in the Eastern DRC. African Affairs, 112(449), 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etzioni, A. (2016). Air sea battle: A case study in structural inattention and subterranean forces. Armed Forces and Society, 42(1), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farrell, T. (2010). Improving in war: Military adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–2009. Journal of Strategic Studies, 33(4), 567–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feld, M. D. (1959). Information and authority: The structure of military organization. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The non-spread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franke, V. (2006). The peacebuilding dilemma: Civil-military cooperation in stability operations. International Journal of Peace Studies, 11(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1991). On the characteristics of total institutions. In: E. Goffman (Eds.), Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates (pp. 13–115). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Haddad, S. (2010). Teaching diversity and multicultural competence to French peacekeepers. International Peacekeeping, 17(4), 566–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hajjar, R. M. (2014). Emergent postmodern US military culture. Armed Forces and Society, 40(1), 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, L. K. (2011). The importance of understanding military culture. Social Work in Health Care, 50(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(April), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, J. J., & Segal, D. R. (1985). Observations from the Sinai: The boredom factor. Armed Forces and Society, 11(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison, J. R., & Carroll, G. R. (2006). Culture and demography in organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E., III. (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horn, B. (2004). When cultures collide: The conventional military/SOF chasm. Canadian Military Journal: Autumn, 3–16.Google Scholar
  38. Hull, I. V. (2006). Absolute destruction: Military culture and the practices of war in imperial Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  39. Hunt, J. G., & Philips, R. L. (1991). Leadership in battle and garrison: A framework for understanding the differences and preparing for both. In R. Gal & A. D. Mangelsdorff (Eds.), Handbook of military psychology (pp. 411–429). Chicester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Ienaga, S. (1978). The Pacific war 1931–1945. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Jakobsen, P. V. (1998). The Danish approach to UN peace operations after the Cold War: A new model in the making? International Peacekeeping, 5(3), 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jermier, J. M., Slocum, J. W., Jr., Fry, L. W., & Gaines, J. (1991). Organizational subcultures in a soft bureaucracy: Resistance behind the myth and façade of an official culture. Organization Science, 2(2), 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaplan, R. D. (2007). Hog pilots, blue water grunts. The American military in the air, at sea and on the ground. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  44. Kelty, R., & Bierman, A. (2013). Ambivalence on the front lines: Perceptions of contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. Armed Forces and Society, 39(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelty, R., & The, U. S. (2008). Navy’s Maiden voyage. Effects of integrating sailors and civilian mariners on deployment. Armed Forces and Society, 34(4), 536–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kier, E. (1999). Imagining War. French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. King, A. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces and Society, 32(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. King, A. (2010). Understanding the Helmand campaign: British military operations in Afghanistan. International Affairs, 86(2), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. King, A. (2011). The transformation of Europe’s armed forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. King, A. (2013). The combat soldier. Infantry tactics and cohesion in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirke, C. (2008). Issues in integrating territorial army soldiers into regular British units for operation: A regular view. Defense & Security Analysis, 24(2), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kirke, C. (2009). Group cohesion, culture, and practice. Armed Forces and Society, 35(4), 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kirke, C. (2010). Orders is orders… aren’t they? Rule bending and rule breaking in the British army. Ethnography, 11(30), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kirke, C. (2012). Cross-cultural issues in the four services. Report Defence Academy of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  55. Lang, K. (1965). Military organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 838–878). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  56. Laugen Haaland, T. (2010). Still homeland defenders at heart? Norwegian military culture in international deployments. International Peacekeeping, 17(4), 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Legro, J. W. (1994). Military culture and inadvertent escalation in World War II. International Security, 18(4), 108–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lind, W. S. (1997). Some doctrinal questions for the United States Army. Military Review, 135–143. January/February, 1997.Google Scholar
  59. Lomsky-Feder, E., Gazit, N., & Ben-Ari, E. (2008). Reserve soldiers as transmigrants. Moving between the civilian and military worlds. Armed Forces and Society, 34(4), 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mastroianni, G. (2005–2006). Occupations, cultures, and leadership in the army and the airforce. Parameters. Winter, 76–90.Google Scholar
  61. McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time. Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mehlkop, G., & Graeff, P. (2003). Why nations arm in the age of globalization. Comparative Sociology, 2(4), 667–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Milne, D., & Reiser, R. P. (2012). A rationale for evidence-based clinical supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42(3), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mintzberg, H. (2007). Structure in fives. Designing effective organizations. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  66. Moore, W. E., & Tumin, M. M. (1949). Some social functions of ignorance. American Sociological Review, 14(6), 787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moskos, C. C. (1988). Institutional and occupational trends in armed forces. In C. C. Moskos & F. R. Wood (Eds.), The military—More than just a job? (pp. 211–226). Elmsford Park: Pergamon-Brasseys.Google Scholar
  68. Olsthoorn, P. (2011). Military ethics and virtues. An interdisciplinary approach for the 21st century. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Paris, M. (2000). Warrior nation: Images of war in British popular culture, 1850–2000. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  70. Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations. A critical essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  71. Poponete, C. (2013). Dynamics of military culture and multinational cooperation. A study of the romanian armed forces. Ph.D. dissertation. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  72. Reich, F., & Tilllack, H.-M. (2014). Voll auf die Mütze. Stern, 43, 58–67.Google Scholar
  73. Resteigne, D. (2010). Still connected in operations? The Milblog culture. International Peacekeeping, 17(4), 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ricks, Th. (1997). Making the corps. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  75. Rietjens, S. J. M., & Bollen, M. T. I. B. (Eds.). (2008). Managing civil-military cooperation. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  76. Ritzer, G. (1998). The McDonaldization thesis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Robinson, P. (2007). Modern America has warriors, not soldiers. The Spectator, 13. June 16, 2007.Google Scholar
  78. Ron, N., Lipshitz, R., Popper, M. (2006). How organizations learn; post-flight reviews in a F-16 fighter squadron. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ruffa, C. (2014). What peacekeepers think and do: An exploratory study of French, Ghanian, Italian, and South-Korean armies in the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. Armed Forces and Society, 40(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sangar, E. (2015). The weight of the past(s): The impact of the Bundeswehr’s use of historical experience on strategy-making in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(4), 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., et al. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1053–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scheltinga, T. A. M., Rietjens, S. J. H., de Boer, S. J., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Cultural conflict within civil-military cooperation: A case-study in Bosnia. Low Intensity Conflict & Law Enforcement, 13(1), 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seely Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Segal, M. W. (1986). The military and the family as greedy institutions. Armed Forces and Society, 13(1), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sennett, R. (2013). Together. The rituals, pleasures & politics of cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  86. Soeters, J. (2000). Culture in uniformed organizations. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 465–481). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Soeters, J. (2008). Ambidextrous military: Coping with contradictions of new security policies. In M. den Boer & J. de Wilde (Eds.), The viability of human security (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Soeters, J. (2013a). Odysseus prevails over Achilles. A warrior model suited to post 9/11-conflicts. In J. Burk (Ed.), How 9/11 changed our way of war (pp. 89–115). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Soeters, J. (2013b). Do distinct (national) operational styles of conflict resolution exist? Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(6), 898–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Soeters, J., Bijlsma, T., van den Heuvel, G. (2012). Trust thy ally. Multinational military cooperation in Uruzgan. In R. Beeres, J. van der Meulen, J. Soeters, & A. Vogelaar (Eds.), Mission Uruzgan. Collaborating in multiple coalitions for Afghanistan (pp. 161–176). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Soeters, J., & Heeren-Bogers, J. (2013). The quest for ‘evidence-based soldiering’. In H. Amersfoort, R. Moelker, J. Soeters, & D. Verweij (Eds.), Moral responsibility and military effectiveness (pp. 117–132). The Hague: Asser Press.Google Scholar
  92. Soeters, J., & Manigart, P. (Eds.). (2008). Military cooperation in multinational peace operations. Managing cultural diversity and crisis response. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Soeters, J., & Szvircsev Tresch, T. (2010). Towards cultural integration in multinational peace operations. Defence Studies, 10(1–2), 272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Soeters, J., & van Ouytsel, A. (2014). The challenge of diffusing military professionalism in Africa. Armed Forces and Society, 40(2), 252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Soeters, J., Winslow, D., & Weibul, A. (2003). Military culture. In: G. Caforio (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 237–254). New York etc.: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  96. Sommer, R. (2011). Public sector ERP implementation: Succesfully engaging middle-management. Communications of the IBIMA (open access).Google Scholar
  97. Sørensen, J. B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Liu, G. (2012). Which iron cage? Endo- and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stevenson, H. N. C. (1954). Status evaluation in the Hindu caste system. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great-Britain and Ireland, 84(1/2), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(April), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Uiterwijk, D., Soeters, J., & Van Fenema, P. (2013). Aligning national “logics” in a European helicopter program. Defense & Security Analysis, 29(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van Maanen, J., & Kunda, G. (1989). “Real feelings”: Emotional expression and organizational culture. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 43–103.Google Scholar
  103. Visser, M. (2010). Configurations of human resources practices and battlefield performance: A comparison of two armies. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vrey, F., Esterhuyse, A., & Mandrup, T. (Eds.). (2013). On military culture. Theory, practice and African armed forces. Claremont: UCT Press.Google Scholar
  105. Weber, C. (2012). A genou les hommes, debout les officiers. La socialisation des Saint-Cyriens. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  106. Weber, J., & Gerde, V. W. (2011). Organizational role and environmental uncertainty as influences on ethical work climate in military units. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected. Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Franciso: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  108. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. What government agencies do and why they do it. New York etc.: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  109. Wilson, P. H. (2008). Defining military culture. The Journal of Military History, 72(1), 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Winslow, D. (1998). Misplaced loyalties: The role of military culture in the breakdown of discipline in peace operations. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 35(3), 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Winslow, D. (1999). Rites of passage and group bonding in the Canadian airborne. Armed Forces and Society, 25(3), 429–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Winslow, D. (2002). Strange bedfellows: NGOs and the military in humanitarian crisis. International Journal of Peace Studies, 7(2), 35–55.Google Scholar
  113. Winslow, D. (2007). Military organization and culture from three perspectives: The case of the army. In G. Caforio (Ed.), Social sciences and the military; an interdisciplinary overview (pp. 67–88). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations