Advertisement

School Surveillance, Control, and Resistance in the United Kingdom

  • Anna Carlile
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter outlines the impact of the neoliberal paradigm on how UK schools experience surveillance and implement their security and disciplinary procedures. Marketization leading to audit culture and datafication and harsh disciplinary cultures characterize the scene, with a particular impact on Black and Muslim students. Teaching to the test, teacher stress, and increases in both official and unofficial permanent exclusions abound. However, it is argued that there is some hope for the future of education—structurally, within the Equality Act 2010, through student resistance, drawing on their digital capital, through holistic, restorative approaches to behaviour management, and through the teacher practice of ‘critical bureaucracy’ (Carlile 2012).

References

  1. A.C.P.O. (Association of Chief Police Officers). (2011, February 4). Early intervention: The next steps. The Graham Allen review. Connect. Available at http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/children/2011/20110408%20CYP%20New %20Feb%202011.pdf.
  2. Allen, G. (2011). ‘Early intervention: The next steps. An independent report to her majesty’s government’ London: Cabinet office. Available at: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/early-intervention-next-steps.pdf.
  3. Anderson, J. B. (2008). Social capital and student learning: Empirical results from Latin American primary schools. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BBC. (2015). Trojan horse ‘plot’ schools timeline. Available at http://www.bbc.co.U.K./news/U.K.-england-birmingham-28370552.
  6. BBC. (2016). Dunblane reflects 20 years after school shooting. BBC News. Available at http://www.bbc.co.U.K./news/U.K.-scotland-35784091.
  7. Bodine, A. (2003). School uniforms, academic achievement, and uses of research. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(2), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunsma, D. L., & Rockquemore, K. A. (1998). Effects of student uniforms on attendance, behavior problems, substance use, and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlile, A. (2009a). Bitchy girls and silly boys’: Gender and exclusion from school. International Journal on School Disaffection, 6(2), 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlile, A. (2009b). Sexism and permanent exclusion from school. Forum, 51(3), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlile, A. (2012). Permanent exclusion and institutional prejudice: Critical bureaucracy as a route to inclusion. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Carlile, A., & Paechter, C. (Forthcoming). LGBTQI+ Parented families and schools: Visibility, representation, pride. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Corner, L. (2011, August 30). The politics of the school uniform: A traditional school uniform has become an essential in classrooms across the country; and a drain on parents’ wallets. Independent. Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/the-politics-of-the-school-uniform-2346367.html.
  14. Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Cowie, H., Hutson, N., Dawn, J., & Myers, C. A. (2008). Taking stock of violence in U.K. schools. Risk, Regulation, and Responsibility, 40(4), 494–505.Google Scholar
  16. Department for Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards. Available at https://www.gov.U.K./government/publications/teachers-standards.
  17. Department for Education. (2014a). Promoting fundamental British values as part of SMSC in schools: Departmental advice for maintained schools. Available at https://www.gov.U.K./government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf.
  18. Department for Education. (2014b, July 31). Statistical first release. Permanent and fixed period exclusions in England: 2012 to 2013. SFR 28/2014. Available at https://www.gov.U.K./government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/338094/SFR28_2014_text.pdf.
  19. Department for Education. (2015, July 30). Permanent and fixed-period exclusions in England: 2013 to 2014. National statistics. Available at https://www.gov.U.K./government/statistics/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-in-england-2013-to-2014.
  20. Durodie, B. (2016). Securitising education to prevent terrorism or losing direction? British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Educate & Celebrate. (2016). Available at http://www.educateandcelebrate.org/.
  22. Education Act. (2011). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  23. Elias, M. J. (1989). Schools as a source of stress to children: An analysis of causal and ameliorative influences. Journal of School Psychology, 27(4), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Equality Act. (2010). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  25. Fan, F. A. (2012). Teacher: Students’ interpersonal relationships and students’ academic achievements in social studies. Teachers and Teaching, 18(4), 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Gearon, L. (2015). Education, security, and intelligence studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gorard, S. (1998). The role of nostalgia in school choice. School Leadership & Management, 18(4), 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habib, S. (2014). Teaching britishness: A critical pedagogical framework. Sociological imagination. Available at http://sociologicalimagination.org/archives/16034.
  30. Han, S. (2010). A mandatory uniform policy in urban schools: Findings from the school survey on crime and safety: 2003–04. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 5(8), 1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Hope, A. (2009). CCTV, school surveillance and social control. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hope, A. (2015). Biopower and school surveillance technologies 2.0. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Published online 5 Feb 2015.Google Scholar
  33. Keddie, A. (2014). ‘It’s like spiderman…with great power comes great responsibility’: School autonomy, school context and the audit culture. School leadership and management, 34(5), 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kulz, C. (2014). Structure liberates?’: Mixing for mobility and the cultural transformation of ‘urban children’ in a London academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(4), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamont, E., Macleod, S., & Wilkin, A. (2011). Police officers in schools: A scoping study. National foundation for educational research. Available at https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/PCOX01/PCOX01.pdf.
  36. Lightfoot, L. (2016, March 22). Nearly half of England’s teachers plan to leave in next five years. Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/mar/22/teachers-plan-leave-five-years-survey-workload-england.
  37. Lloyd, G. (2005). Problem girls: Understanding and supporting girls and young women. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucey, H., & Reay, D. (2002). A market in waste: Psychic and structural dimensions of school-choice policy in the U.K. and children’s narratives on ‘demonized’ schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 23(3), 253–266.Google Scholar
  39. Macrae, S., Maguire, M., & Milbourne, L. (2003). Social exclusion: Exclusion from school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Margaret Thatcher Foundation. Interview for woman’s own: ‘There is no such thing as society. Available at http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689.
  41. McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Kane, J., Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2008a). I was dead restorative today’: From restorative justice to restorative approaches in school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Kane, J., Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2008b). Can restorative practices in schools make a difference? Educational Review, 60(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCluskey, G., Kane, J., Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2011). Teachers are afraid we are stealing their strength’: A risk society and restorative approaches in school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mendick, H., Allen, K., & Harvey, L. (2015). “We can get everything we want if we try hard’: Young people, celebrity, hard work’. British Journal of Educational Studies. Published online 28 Feb. 2015.Google Scholar
  45. Mills, M., & Pini, B. (2015). Punishing kids: The rise of the ‘boot camp’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(3), 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murray, J. (2012, February 13). Michael gove is a big fan of blazers and ties in schools. The guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/feb/13/michael-gove-school-uniform-row.
  47. O’Connor, L. (2009). Effective collaborations between police and schools: Have lessons been learnt? Policing, 4(2), 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Posner, D. (2004). What’s wrong with teaching to the test? Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10), 749–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prince, R. (2009, October 1). School uniforms return in drive to improve school discipline. Telegraph. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6248218/School-uniforms-return-in-drive-to-improve-school-discipline.html.
  50. Quinn, B. (2016, March 11). Nursery ‘raised fears of radicalisation over boy’s cucumber drawing’: Woman says staff threatened to refer her son to counter-extremism programme thinking he had drawn a ‘cooker bomb’. Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/U.K.-news/2016/mar/11/nursery-radicalisation-fears-boys-cucumber-drawing-cooker-bomb.
  51. RaiseOnline. Available at www.raiseonline.org.
  52. Ratcliffe, R. (2016, July 11). Teachers made one-third of referrals to prevent strategy in 2015: Number of referrals to government’s counter-terrorism scheme has tripled on 2014, as schools now have legal duty to act. Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/U.K.-news/2016/jul/12/teachers-made-one-third-of-referrals-to-prevent-strategy-in-2015.
  53. Robbins, C. G. (2008). ‘Emergency!’ or how to learn to live with neoliberal globalization. Policy Futures in Education, 6(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robbins, C. G. (2012). Disposable youth/damaged democracy: Youth, neoliberalism, and the promise of pedagogy in the work of Henry Giroux. Policy Futures in Education, 10(6), 627–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts-Holmes, G. (2015). The ‘datafication’ of early years pedagogy: ‘If the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there’s bad teaching, there is bad data. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 302–315.Google Scholar
  56. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  57. Sellman, E. (2011). Peer mediation services for conflict resolution in schools: What transformations in activity characterise successful implementation? British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Show My Homework. Available at https://www.showmyhomework.co.U.K./.
  59. Stewart, H. (2016, May 3). Labour criticises sats changes as parents plan ‘kids’ strike’ over exams: Government accused of creating ‘chaos and confusion’ over primary school testing in England amid growing calls for boycott. Guardian. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/may/03/labour-criticises-sats-changes-as-parents-plan-kids-strike-over-exams.
  60. Stover, D. (1990). The dress mess. American School Board Journal, 177(6), 26–39.Google Scholar
  61. Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Tait, G. (2010). Philosophy, behavior disorders and the school. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, E. (2011). U.K. schools, CCTV and the data protection act 1998. Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Teague, L. (2014). Subjectivity, agency and political pedagogy in the primary school. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Turnitin. Available at www.turnitin.com.
  67. Waters, J. (2009). Reading between the lines. T.H.E. Journal, 36(9), 23–27.Google Scholar
  68. Williams, R. (2015). School heads raise alarm over new duty to protect students from extremism: Anti-terrorism laws requiring schools to monitor and shield pupils from radicalisation put at risk the debate that is at the heart of learning, say staff. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jun/09/schools-duty-police-extremism-anti-terrorism-laws.
  69. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  70. Yar, M. (2003). Panoptic power and the pathologisation of vision: Critical reflections on the foucauldian thesis. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 254–271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Carlile
    • 1
  1. 1.Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations