• Bridget Fowler
Part of the St Antony's Series book series (STANTS)


Hermínio Martins possessed a worldview of unusual complexity and coherence. The chief aim in the introduction is to outline his achievements, from his early historical sociology of Portugal and Brazil to his later critique of sociobiology and biotechnology, concluding with his memorable analysis of the marketisation of the public university. The first half presents an overview of his main publications, allowing readers to appreciate his highly distinctive voice. The second half introduces the festschrift contributors, presenting, in distilled form, the nature and significance of their main themes. The series of memoirs and chapters as a whole spans the rich variety of Martins’ interests, allowing readers to assess, situate and elaborate on his ideas.


  1. Anderson, P. 1962. Portugal and the End of Ultra-Colonialism 1 and 2. New Left Review I/15: 83–103 and I/16:88–103.Google Scholar
  2. Bernal, J.D. (1929) 1970. The World, the Flesh and the Devil. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2001. Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, R. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M., and N. Devletoglou. 1971. Academia in Anarchy: An Economic Diagnosis. London: Stacey.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, N. 2012. How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions? Chicago: Haymarket.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, W. 1947. Rural Latin American Culture. Social Forces 25: 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dronamraju, K.R. 1985. Haldane: The Life and Work of J. B. S. Haldane with Special Reference to India. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn T. (1962) 1966. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacKenzie, D., and G. Spinardi. 1998. Tacit Knowledge and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons. In Knowing Machines, ed. D. MacKenzie, 215–260. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Macnicol, J. 2015. Neoliberalising Old Age. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martins, H.G. 1967. Ideology and Development: ‘Developmental Nationalism’ in Brazil. Sociological Review Monographs 11: 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 1968. Portugal. In European Fascism, ed. S. Woolf, 302–336. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1969. Opposition in Portugal. Government and Opposition 4 (5): 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 1971. Portugal. In Contemporary Europe: Class, Status and Power, ed. M. Scotford Archer and S. Giner, 60–89. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1972. The Kuhnian ‘Revolution’ and its Implications for Sociology. In Imagination and Precision in the Social Sciences: Essays in Memory of Peter Nettl, ed. S. Rokkan, A.H. Hanson, and T.J. Nossiter, 13–58. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1974. Time and Theory in Sociology. In Approaches to Sociology: An Introduction to Major Trends in British Sociology, ed. John Rex, 246–294. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. ———. (1974) 1993. Hegel, Texas: Issues in the Sociology and Philosophy of Technology. In Knowledge and Passion: Essays in Honour of John Rex, ed. Hermínio Martins, 226–249. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1996. Technology, the Risk Society and Post-History. In ISCSP: 90 Anos, ed. J. Bettencourt da Câmara, 221–240. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1998. Technology, Modernity, Politics. In The Politics of Postmodernity, ed. J. Good and I. Velody, 152–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2001. Goodbye, Body: Momenta of Discarnation in Technoscience Today. In Fast Forward Body: Número Magazine, ed. D. Guardo and J. Urbano, 34–47. Lisbon: Opium e Arte (a bilingual work, also online).Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2007. Paths to the Post-Human. Configurações: Revista de Sociologia 1 (2): 29–56.Google Scholar
  25. ———. (2004) 2012. The Marketisation of Universities and some Cultural Contradictions of Academic Capitalism. Metacrítica-Revista de Filosofia da Unidade de Investigação em Ciência, Tecnológia e Sociedade Universidade Lusófona 1(4): 1–78 (online ed.: Metacrítica: Revista de Filosofia 4;
  26. ———. 2013. Firms, Markets, Technology: Biographies of a Technomarket World (2013 unpublished ms, 29,000 words).Google Scholar
  27. ———. n.d.-a. Darwinism and Technology: Issues in History and Theory (unfinished ms. of 9000 words, circulated privately).Google Scholar
  28. ———. n.d.-b. Darwinism and the Social Sciences: Issues concerning Physicalism and Humanism (unfinished ms. of 6000 words, circulated privately).Google Scholar
  29. Mirowski, P. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Harvard. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Saramago, J. 2013. Raised from the Ground. London: Harvill Collins.Google Scholar
  32. Simmel, G. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Titmuss, R. 1970. The Gift Relationship. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Wainwright, S.P., and B.S. Turner. 2006. ‘Just Crumbling to Bits’? An Exploration of the Body, Ageing, Injury and Career in Classical Ballet Dancers. Sociology 40 (2): 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bridget Fowler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations