Tennis Equipment and Technique Interactions on Risk of Overuse Injuries

  • Tom Allen
  • Sharon Dixon
  • Marcus Dunn
  • Duane KnudsonEmail author


Tennis players have a variety of equipment choices that interact with biomechanical factors to influence risk of overuse injuries. Immediate loading on the upper extremity is influenced by player strokes and properties of racquets, strings, and the ball. Lower extremity loading depends on the interaction of the players’ shoes and court surface. Most of the research in these areas are retrospective or modelling studies that point to the likely long-term effects of changes in equipment on player risk of injury. Few prospective studies have been conducted to confirm these hypotheses.


  1. 1.
    Rogowski I, Creveaux T, Triquigeneaux S, et al. Tennis racquet vibrations and shock transmission to the wrist during forehand drive. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132925. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pluim B, Staal J, Windler G, et al. Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:415–23. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sell K, Hainline B, Yorio M, et al. Injury trend analysis from the US Open tennis championships between 1994 and 2009. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:546–51. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lynall RC, Kerr ZY, Djoko A, et al. Epidemiology of National Collegiate Athletic Association men’s and women’s tennis injuries, 2009/2010–2014/2015. Br J Sports Med. Online First. 2015. Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCurdie I, Smith S, Bell PH, et al. Tennis injury data from The Championships Wimbledon, from 2003 to 2012. Br J Sports Med. Online First. 2015. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pluim BM, Loeffen FGJ, Clarsen B, et al. A one-season prospective study of injuries and illness in elite junior tennis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26:564–72. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knudson D, Allen T, Choppin S. Interaction of tennis racquet design and biomechanical factors. In: Hong Y, editor. Routledge handbook of ergonomics in sport and exercise. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 423–39.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allen T, Choppin S, Knudson D. A review of tennis racquet performance parameters. Sports Eng. 2016;19:1–11. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knudson D. Biomechanical aspects of the tennis racquet. In: Hong Y, Bartlett R, editors. Routledge handbook of biomechanics and human movement science. London: Routledge; 2008. p. 248–60.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knudson D. Intra-subject variability of upper extremity angular kinematics in the tennis forehand drive. Int J Sport Biomech. 1990;6:415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knudson D. Factors affecting force loading in the tennis forehand. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1991;31:527–31.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plagehnoef S. Tennis racquet testing. In: Terauds J, editor. Biomechanics in sports. Del Mar, CA: Research Center for Sports; 1982. p. 411–21.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bahamonde R, Knudson D. Kinetics of the upper extremity in the open and square stance tennis forehand. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6:88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knudson D, Bahamonde R. Trunk and racquet kinematics at impact in the open and square stance tennis forehand. Biol Sport. 1999;16:3–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knudson D, Blackwell J. Trunk muscle activation in open stance and square stance tennis forehands. Int J Sports Med. 2000;21:321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lane B, Sherratt P, Xiao H, et al. Characterisation of ball impact conditions in professional tennis: matches played on hard court. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol. 2015. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mecheri S, Rioult F, Mantel B, et al. The serve impact in tennis: first large-scale study of big Hawk-Eye data. Stat Anal Data Mining. 2016;9(5):310–25. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brody H. Physics of the tennis racquet. Am J Phys. 1979;47:482–7. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brody H, Cross R, Lindsey C. The physics and technology of tennis. CA: Racquet Tech Pub; 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cross R, Lindsey C. Technical tennis. CA: Racquet Tech Pub; 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elliott B, Marshall R, Noffal G. Contributions of upper limb segment rotations during the power serve in tennis. J Appl Biomech. 1995;11:433–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell S, Jones R, King M. Head speed vs. racquet inertia in the tennis serve. Sports Eng. 2000;3:99–110. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allen T. Finite element model of a tennis ball impact with a racquet. Doctoral dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allen T, Haake S, Goodwill S. Effect of tennis racquet parameters on a simulated groundstroke. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(3):311–25. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hennig E. Influence of racquet properties on injuries and performance in tennis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2007;35:62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choppin S. An investigation into the power point in tennis. Sports Eng. 2013;16:173–80. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cross R. Center of percussion of hand-held implements. Am J Phys. 2004;72:622–30. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Choppin S, Goodwill S, Haake S. Impact characteristics of the ball and racquet during play at the Wimbledon qualifying tournament. Sport Eng. 2011;13:163–70. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hatze H. Impact probability distribution, sweet spot, and the concept of an effective power region in tennis racquets. J Appl Biomech. 1994;10:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caross R. The sweet spots of a tennis racquet. Sports Eng. 1998;1:63–78. Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cross R. Factors affecting the vibration of tennis racquets. Sports Eng. 2015;18:135–47. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Creveaux T, Sevrez V, Coste B, et al. Methodological contribution to study the vibratory behaviour of tennis racquets following real forehand drive impact. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17:150–1. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Banwell G, Roberts J, Halkon B, et al. Understanding the dynamic behaviour of a tennis racquet under play conditions. Exp Mech. 2014;54(4):527–37. Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brody H. Vibration damping of tennis racquets. Int J Sport Biomech. 1989;5:451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cross R. Impact forces and torques transmitted to the hand by tennis racquets. Sports Technol. 2010;3(2):102–11. Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vethecan JK, Subic AJ. Vibration attenuation of tennis racquets using tuned vibration absorbers. Sports Eng. 2002;5:155–64. Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller S. Modern tennis racquets, balls, and surfaces. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:401–5. Scholar
  38. 38.
    Whiteside D, Elliott B, Lay B, et al. The effect of racquet swing weight on serve kinematics in elite adolescent female tennis players. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;17:124–8. Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schorah D, Choppin S, James D. Effects of moment of inertia on restricted motion swing speed. Sports Biomech. 2015;14:157–67. Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cross R, Bower R. Effects of swing-weight on swing speed and racquet power. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:23–30. Scholar
  41. 41.
    Haake S, Allen T, Choppin S, et al. The evolution of the tennis racquet and its effect on serve speed. In: Miller S, Capel-Davies J, editors. Tennis science and technology, vol. 3. London: International Tennis Federation; 2007. p. 257–71.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    King M, Hau A, Blenkinsop G. The effect of ball impact location on racquet and forearm joint angle changes for one-handed tennis backhand groundstrokes. J Sports Sci. 2016:1–8. Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lammer H. Racquet with self-powered piezoelectric damping system. U.S. Patent 6,974,397, 13 Dec 2005Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lammer H. Racquet with self-powered piezoelectric damping system. U.S. Patent 7,160,286, 9 Jan 2007Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kotze J, Lammer H, Cottey R, et al. The effects of active piezo fibre racquets on tennis elbow. In: Miller S, editor. Tennis science and technology 2. London: International Tennis Federation; 2003. p. 55–60.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cottey R, Kotze J, Lammer H, et al. An extended study investigating the effects of tennis racquets with active damping technology on the symptoms of tennis elbow. In: Moritz E, Haake S, editors. Engineering of sport 6. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Elliott N, Choppin S, Goodwill S, et al. Markerless tracking of tennis racquet motion using a camera. Procedia Eng. 2014;72:344–9. Scholar
  48. 48.
    ITF. 2016 ITF rules of tennis, 2016. Accessed 22 June 2016
  49. 49.
    Choppin S, Goodwill S, Haake S. Investigations into the effect of grip tightness on off-centre forehand strikes in tennis. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol. 2010;224(4):249–57. Scholar
  50. 50.
    Allen T, Haake S, Goodwill S. Comparison of a finite element model of a tennis racquet to experimental data. Sports Eng. 2009;12:87–98. Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goodwill SR, Haake SJ. Spring damper model of an impact between a tennis ball and racquet. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2001;215:1331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Haake SJ, Carré M, Goodwill SR. The dynamic impact characteristics of tennis balls with tennis racquets. J Sport Sci. 2003;21:839–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nicolaides A, Elliott N, Kelley J, et al. Effect of string bed pattern on ball spin generation from a tennis racquet. Sports Eng. 2013;16:181–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Washida Y, Elliott N, Allen T. Measurement of main strings movement and its effect on tennis ball spin. Procedia Eng. 2014;72:557–62. Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kawazoe Y. Effects of string pre-tension on impact between ball and racquet in tennis. Ther Appl Mech. 1994;43:223–32.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cross R, Lindsay C, Andruczyk D. Laboratory testing of tennis strings. Sports Eng. 2000;4:219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mohandhas BR, Makaram N, Drew TS, et al. Racquet string tension directly affects force experienced at the elbow: implications for the development of lateral epicondylitis in tennis players. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8(3):184–91. Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stroede CL, Noble L, Walker HS. The effect of tennis racquet string vibration dampers on racquet handle vibrations and discomfort following impacts. J Sport Sci. 1999;17:379–85. Scholar
  59. 59.
    Li FX, Fewtrell D, Jenkins M. String vibration dampers do not reduce racquet frame vibration transfer to the forearm. J Sport Sci. 2004;22:1041–52. Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wilson JF, Davis JS. Tennis racquet shock mitigation experiments. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117:479–84. Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mohr S, Cottey R, Lau D, et al. Dynamics of a string-bed damper on tennis racquets. In: The engineering of sport 7. Paris: Springer; 2008. p. 179–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Baszczynski P, Chevrel-Fraux C, Flcheux C, et al. Settings adjustment for string tension and mass of a tennis racquet depending on ball characteristics: laboratory and field testing. Procedia Eng. 2016;147:472–7. Scholar
  63. 63.
    Knudson D, Blackwell J. Effect of type 3 ball on upper extremity EMG and acceleration in the tennis forehand. In: Blackwell JR, editor. Proceedings of oral sessions: XIX international symposium on biomechanics in sports. San Francisco, CA: University of San Francisco; 2001. p. 32–4.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Blackwell J, Knudson D. Effect of the type 3 (oversize) tennis ball on serve performance and upper extremity muscle activity. Sports Biomech. 2002;1:187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Andrew DPS, Chow JW, Knudson D, et al. Effect of ball size on player reaction and racquet acceleration during the tennis volley. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6:102–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Buszard T, Farrow D, Reid M, et al. Modifying equipment in early skill development: a tennis perspective. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2014;85:218–25. Scholar
  67. 67.
    Buszard T, Reid M, Masters RSW, et al. Scaling the equipment and play area in children’s sport to improve motor skill acquisition: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2016;46:829–43. Scholar
  68. 68.
    International Tennis Federation. International Tennis Federation, 2015. Accessed 20 Nov.
  69. 69.
    International Tennis Federation Technical Department. International Tennis Federation Technical Department, 2016. Accessed 20 Nov.
  70. 70.
    O'Donoghue P, Ingram B. A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy. J Sports Sci. 2001;19:107–15. Scholar
  71. 71.
    Brown E, O’Donoghue PG. Gender and surface effect on elite tennis strategy. ITF Coach Sport Sci Rev. 2008;46(12):9–12.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kerr ZY, Dompier TP, Snook EM, et al. National collegiate athletic association injury surveillance system: review of methods for 2004–2005 through 2013–2014 data collection. J Athl Train. 2014;49:552–60. Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fernandez J, Mendez-Villanueva A, Pluim BM. Intensity of tennis match play. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:387–91. Scholar
  74. 74.
    Girard O, Eicher F, Fourchet F, et al. Effects of the playing surface on plantar pressures and potential injuries in tennis. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:733–8. Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dragoo JL, Braun HJ. The effect of playing surface on injury rate. Sports Med. 2010;40:981–90. Scholar
  76. 76.
    Breznik K, Batagelj V. Retired matches among male professional tennis players. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11:270–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Murias JM, Lanatta D, Arcuri CR, et al. Metabolic and functional responses playing tennis on different surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21:112–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bastholt P. Professional tennis (ATP tour) and number of medical treatments in relation to type of surface. Med Sci Tennis. 2000;5:2.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Reid M, Duffield R. The development of fatigue during match-play tennis. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:i7–i11. Scholar
  80. 80.
    Reid M, Morgan S, Whiteside D. Match play characteristics of Grand Slam tennis: implications for training and conditioning. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1791–8. Scholar
  81. 81.
    Perš J, Bon M, Kovačič S, et al. Observation and analysis of large-scale human motion. Hum Mov Sci. 2002;21:295–311. Scholar
  82. 82.
    Martínez-Gallego R, Guzmán JF, James N, et al. Movement characteristics of elite tennis players on hard courts with respect to the direction of ground strokes. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12:275–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Dunn MD. Video-based step measurement in sport and daily living. Ph.D. Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, 2014.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fernandez-Fernandez J, Sanz-Rivas D, Fernandez-Garcia B, et al. Match activity and physiological load during a clay-court tennis tournament in elite female players. J Sports Sci. 2008;26:1589–95. Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pereira TJC, Nakamura FY, Jesus MTD, et al. Analysis of the distances covered and technical actions performed by professional tennis players during official matches. J Sports Sci. 2016:1–8. Scholar
  86. 86.
    Hughes M, Meyer R. Movement pattern in elite men’s singles tennis. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2005;5:110–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dunn M, Goodwill S, Wheat J, et al. Assessing tennis player interactions with tennis courts. In: Vilas-Boas JP, Machado L, Kim W, Veloso AP, editors. Biomechanics in sports 29. Portugal: University of Porto; 2011. p. 859–62.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Cooper LB. Effects of cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running. Int J Sports Med. 1983;4:247–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Stiles VH, Dixon SJ. Biomechanical response to systematic changes in impact interface cushioning properties while performing a tennis specific movement. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:1229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lilley K, Dixon S, Stiles V. A biomechanical comparison of the running gait of mature and young females. Gait Posture. 2011;33:496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Stiles VH, Dixon SJ. The influence of different playing surfaces on the biomechanics of a tennis running forehand foot plant. J Appl Biomech. 2006;22:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Stucke H, Baudzus W, Baumann W. On friction characteristics of playing surfaces. In: Frederick FC, editor. Sports shoes and playing surfaces. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1984. p. 87–97.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Damm L, Low D, Richardson A, Clarke J, Carré M, Dixon S. The effects of surface traction characteristics on frictional demand and kinematics in tennis. Sports Biomech. 2013;12:389–402. Scholar
  94. 94.
    Damm L, Starbuck C, Stocker N, Clarke J, Carré M, Dixon S. Shoe-surface friction in tennis: influence on plantar pressure and implications for injury. Footwear Sci. 2014;6:155–64. Scholar
  95. 95.
    Dixon S, Damm L, Starbuck C, Clarke J, Carré M. Understanding player response to changes in shoe-surface friction during tennis-specific movements. In Proceedings of the world congress of biomechanics, Boston, 2014.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stiles V, Dixon S. Sports surfaces, biomechanics and injury. In: Dixon S, Fleming P, James I, Carre M, editors. The science and engineering of sport surfaces. Oxon: Routledge; 2015. p. 70–97.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Llana S, Brizuela G, Alcántara E, Martínez A, García A. Study of comfort associated with tennis footwear. In: Riehle HJ, Vieten M, editors. 16th International symposium on biomechanics in sports. Konstanz: University of Konstanz; 1998. p. 1124–7.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Llana-Belloch S, Brizuela G, Pérez-Soriano P, García-Belenguer A, Crespo M. Supination control increases performance in sideward cutting movements in tennis. Sports Biomech. 2013;12:38–47. Scholar
  99. 99.
    Pavailler S, Horvais N. Sliding allows faster repositioning during tennis specific movements on hard court. Procedia Eng. 2014;72:859–64. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Allen
    • 1
  • Sharon Dixon
    • 2
  • Marcus Dunn
    • 3
  • Duane Knudson
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  4. 4.Texas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations