How the West Was Spun: The De-politicization of Fire in the American West

  • Gregory L. Simon


Diverse groups in the American West extract profits and surplus value from fire-prone areas at the urban periphery while inserting considerable social risks and costs back onto the landscape. To better excavate these drivers of increased risk (referred to here as ‘the Incendiary’), this chapter suggests a Critical Physical Geography approach to fire that shifts our focus from the study of wildland-urban interface areas to the study of affluence-vulnerability interface processes. This approach is particularly important because reckless resource management and planning practices are de-politicized and obscured behind a series of scientific framings and policy debates. Suburban areas and their injurious and costly wildfires are ‘spun’ as strangely natural and inevitable. A second process of re-politicization supports this de-politicization by filling the debate arena with other distracting ideological disputes and micro-scale controversies.


  1. Alagona, P. 2013. After the grizzly: Endangered species and the politics of place in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Associated Press. 2016. Possible human remains found in deadly California wildfire. June 25.Google Scholar
  3. Botts, H., T. Jeffrey, S. McCabe, B. Stueck, and L. Suhr. 2015. Wildfire hazard risk report: Residential wildfire exposure estimates for the Western United States. Report by CoreLogic.Google Scholar
  4. CalFire. 2013. State of California Wildfire Incident Information. Accessed 17 July 2013.
  5. Cohen, J. 2008. The wildland-urban interface fire problem: A consequence of the fire exclusion paradigm. Forest History Today, Fall. pp. 20–26.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, M. 1998. Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  7. Ewell, P.L. 1995. The Oakland-Berkeley Hills Fire of 1991. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-158.Google Scholar
  8. FEMA. 1992. The East Bay Hills Fire Oakland-Berkeley, California. U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series USFA-TR-060, FEMA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2002. Fires in the Wildland/Urban Interface. U.S. Fire Administration, Topical Fire Research Series 2(16).Google Scholar
  10. Fire Adapted Communities. 2014. Guide to Fire Adapted Communities. Fire Adapted Communities OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorte, R. 2013. The rising cost of Wildfire Protection. Headwaters Economics.
  12. Green. M. 2013. The flammable west: Mega-Fires in the age of climate change (with real-time fire map). KQED News. 9, AugGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammer, R.B., V.C. Radeloff, J.S. Freid, and S.I. Stewart. 2007. Wildland-urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 16: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hessl, A. 2011. Pathways for climate change effects on fire: Models, data, and uncertainties. Progress in Physical Geography 35 (3): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holthaus, E. 2016. We need to talk about climate change: Tragedies like the Fort McMurray fire make it more important, not less. Slate. 6 May.Google Scholar
  16. IAWF. 2013. International Association of Wildland Fire. Accessed 25 May 2015.
  17. Ingalsbee, T. 2010. Getting burned: A taxpayer’s guide to wildfire suppression costs. Eugene, OR: Firefighters United for Safety, Ethics and Ecology (FUSEE).Google Scholar
  18. Kolbert, E. 2016. Fort McMurray and the fires of climate change. The New Yorker. 5 May.Google Scholar
  19. Mai-Duc, C. 2016. Brown’s budget earmarks big money for natural disasters. Los Angeles Times. 8, January.Google Scholar
  20. Moritz, M.A., E. Batllori, R.A. Bradstock, A.M. Gill, J. Handmer, P.F. Hessburg, J. Leonard, S. McCaffrey, D.C. Odion, T. Schoennagel, and A.D. Syphard. 2014. Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Wildfire Coordinating Group. 2014. Wildland urban interface wildfire mitigation desk reference guide. PMS 051. August.Google Scholar
  22. NFPA. 1992. The Oakland/Berkeley hill fire. National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Initiative.Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, D.L. 2010. Managing fire and fuels in a warmer climate. Northwest Woodlands 26 (16–17): 28–29.Google Scholar
  24. Simon, G.L. 2014. Vulnerability-in-production: A spatial history of nature, affluence, and fire in Oakland, California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (6): 1199–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2016. Flame and fortune in the American West: Urban development, environmental change, and the great Oakland Hills Fire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, G.L., and S. Dooling. 2013. Flame and fortune in California: The material and political dimensions of vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 23 (6): 1410–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smithwick, E.A.H., M.G. Ryan, D.M. Kashian, W.H. Romme, D.B. Tinker, and M.G. Turner. 2009. Modeling the effects of fire and climate change on carbon and nitrogen storage in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) stands. Global Change Biology 15 (3): 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Theobald, D.M., and W.H. Romme. 2007. Expansion of the US wildland-urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning 83: 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. United States Forest Service. 2015. National forests on the edge: Development pressures on America’s National Forests and Grasslands Accessed 25 May 2015
  30. Upton, J 2016. How the U.S. West Can Live With Fire. Scientific American. Found online at: (First appearing on Climate Central on May 28, 2015).
  31. Westerling, A.L., and B.P. Bryant. 2008. Climate change and wildfire in California. Climatic Change 87 (1): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Westerling, A., T. Brown, T. Schoennagel, T. Swetnam, M. Turner, and T. Veblen. 2014. Briefing: Climate and wildfire in western US forests. In Forest conservation and management in the Anthropocene: Conference proceedings. Proceedings. RMRS-P-71, ed. V. Alaric Sample and R. Patrick Bixler, 81–102. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  33. WildfireX. 2015. Data based on a 2012 study conducted by market research firm IBISWorld. Accessed 30 Mar 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory L. Simon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations