Critical Invasion Science: Weeds, Pests, and Aliens

  • Christian A. Kull


The study of invasive plants and animals calls strongly for a critical approach due to the deeply social nature of invasion landscapes, the power relations affecting the science of invasions, and the differential impacts of weed or pest control on lives and landscapes. I first explore what a “critical” invasion science means. Then I investigate several aspects of invasion science ripe for critical analysis: the history of the science (to understand what the science is doing and why), the terminology and categories of analysis, and the highly contested social, political, and ethical context within which invasion management takes place. I conclude with four proposals for further work in critical invasion science and examples of the types of questions it might ask.


  1. Atchison, J., and L. Head. 2013. Eradicating bodies in invasive plant management. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (6): 951–968.Google Scholar
  2. Awanyo, L. 2001. Labor, ecology, and a failed agenda of market incentives: The political ecology of agrarian reforms in Ghana. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (1): 92–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach, T.M. 2015. “All about healthy country”: Aboriginal perspectives of weed management in the Kimberley, Western Australia. PhD, Monash University.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, T.M., and B.M.H. Larson. 2017. Speaking about weeds: Indigenous elders’ metaphors for invasive species and their management. Environmental Values26 (5): 561–581.Google Scholar
  5. Bean, A.R. 2007. A new system for determining which plant species are indigenous in Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 20: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beinart, W., and L. Wotshela. 2011. Prickly pear: The social history of a plant in the Eastern Cape. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, B.M. 2014. Model invasions and the development of national concerns over invasive introduced trees: Insights from South African history. Biological Invasions 16: 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley, J.W., M. Webb, S. Nina, and S. Pérez. 2005. Even useful weeds are pests: Ethnobotany in the Bolivian Andes. International Journal of Pest Management 51 (3): 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackburn, T.M., P. Pyšek, S. Bacher, J.T. Carlton, R.P. Duncan, V. JarosÌk, J.R.U. Wilson, and D.M. Richardson. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26 (7): 333–339.Google Scholar
  10. Boonman-Berson, S., E. Turnhout, and J. van Tatenhove. 2014. Invasive species: The categorization of wildlife in science, policy, and wildlife management. Land Use Policy 38: 204–212
  11. Carruthers, J., L. Robin, J.P. Hattingh, C.A. Kull, H. Rangan, and B.W. van Wilgen. 2011. A native at home and abroad: The history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of Acacia. Diversity and Distributions 17 (5): 810–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandrasena, N. 2014. Living with weeds—A new paradigm. Indian Journal of Weed Science 46 (1): 96–110.Google Scholar
  13. Chew, M.K. 2015. Ecologists, environmentalists, experts, and the invasion of the ‘second greatest threat’. International Review of Environmental History 1: 7–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chew, M.K., and A.L. Hamilton. 2011. The rise and fall of biotic nativeness: A historical perspective. In 50 years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Cochard, R., D.T. Ngo, P.O. Waeber, and C.A. Kull. 2017. Extent and causes of forest cover changes in Vietnam’s provinces 1993–2013: A review and analysis of official data. Environmental Reviews 25 (2): 199–217.Google Scholar
  16. Colautti, R.I., and H.J. MacIsaac. 2004. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Diversity and Distributions 10: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colautti, R.I., and D.M. Richardson. 2009. Subjectivity and flexibility in invasion terminology: Too much of a good thing? Biological Invasions 11 (6): 1225–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Comaroff, J., and J.L. Comaroff. 2001. Naturing the nation: Aliens, apocalypse and the postcolonial state. Journal of Southern African Studies 27 (3): 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Courchamp, F., A. Fournier, C. Bellard, C. Bertelsmeier, E. Bonnaud, J.M. Jeschke, and J.C. Russell. 2017. Invasion biology: Specific problems and possible solutions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 (1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cronk, Q.C.B., and J.L. Fuller. 1995. Plant invaders: The threat to natural ecosystems. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Cullen, J.M., and E.S. Delfosse. 1984. Echium plantagineum: Catalyst for conflict and change in Australia. Proc. VI Int. Symp. Biol. Contr. Weeds, Vancouver, Canada, Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Cutter, S.L. 2003. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, M.A. 2009. Invasion biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, M.A., M.K. Chew, R.J. Hobbs, A.E. Lugo, J.J. Ewel, G.J. Vermeij, J.H. Brown, et al. 2011. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474: 153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Demeritt, D. 2009. Geography and the promise of integrative environmental research. Geoforum 40: 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drake, J.A., H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, eds. 1989. Biological invasions: A global perspective. SCOPE 37. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Ellender, B.R., O.L.F. Weyl, H. Winker, and A.J. Booth. 2010. Quantifying the annual fish harvest from South Africa’s largest freshwater reservoir. Water SA 36 (1): 45–52.Google Scholar
  28. Estévez, R.A., C.B. Anderson, J.C. Pizarro, and M.A. Burgman. 2015. Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conservation Biology 29 (1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Frawley, J., and I. McCalman, eds. 2014. Rethinking invasion ecologies from the environmental humanities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Gautier, D., and T.A. Benjaminsen, eds. 2012. Environnement, discours et pouvoir: L’approche Political ecology. Versailles: Éditions Quæ.Google Scholar
  32. Green, L. 2014. Ecology, race, and the making of environmental publics: A dialogue with Silent Spring in South Africa. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities 1 (2): 20.Google Scholar
  33. Gregory, D., R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, and S. Whatmore, eds. 2009. The dictionary of human geography. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Gutman, G., A.C. Janetos, C.O. Justice, E.F. Moran, J.F. Mustard, R.R. Rindfuss, D. Skole, B.L. Turner II, and M.A. Cochrane, eds. 2004. Land change science: Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth’s surface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Head, L., B.M.H. Larson, R.J. Hobbs, J. Atchison, N. Gill, C.A. Kull, and H. Rangan. 2015. Living with invasive plants in the Anthropocene: The importance of understanding practice and experience. Conservation and Society 13 (3): 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hennessy, E.A. 2014. On the backs of tortoises: Conserving evolution in the Galápagos Islands. PhD, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  37. Hoffmann, B.D., and F. Courchamp. 2016a. Biological invasions and natural colonisations: Are they that different? NeoBiota 29: 1–14.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2016b. When similarities matter more than differences: A reply to Wilson et al. NeoBiota 31: 99–104.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, S. 2010. Bioinvaders. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2012. What is conservation science? BioScience 62 (11): 962–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kates, R.W., W.C. Clark, R. Corell, J.M. Hall, C.C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J.J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292 (5517): 641–642.Google Scholar
  42. Kimmerer, R.W. 2013. Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
  43. Kowarik, I., and P. Pyšek. 2012. The first steps towards unifying concepts in invasion ecology were made one hundred years ago: Revisiting the work of the Swiss botanist Albert Thellung. Diversity and Distributions 18: 1243–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kueffer, C., and B.M.H. Larson. 2014. Responsible use of language in scientific writing and science communication. BioScience 64: 719–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kull, C.A., and H. Rangan. 2015. The political ecology of weeds: A scalar approach to landscape transformation. In The international handbook of political ecology, ed. R.L. Bryant, 487–500. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2016. Political ecology and resilience: Competing interdisciplinarities? In Interdisciplinarités entre Natures et Sociétés: Colloque de Cerisy, ed. B. Hubert and N. Mathieu, 71–87. Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  47. Kull, C.A., and J. Tassin. 2012. Australian acacias: Useful and (sometimes) weedy. Biological Invasions 14 (11): 2229–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kull, C.A., C.M. Shackleton, P.J. Cunningham, C. Ducatillion, J.-M. Dufour-Dror, K.J. Esler, J.B. Friday, et al. 2011. Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Diversity and Distributions 17 (5): 822–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kull, C.A., J. Tassin, S. Moreau, H. Rakoto Ramiarantsoa, C. Blanc-Pamard, and S.M. Carrière. 2012. The introduced flora of Madagascar. Biological Invasions 14 (4): 875–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kull, C.A., J. Tassin, and S.M. Carrière. 2014. Approaching invasive species in Madagascar. Madagascar Conservation and Development 9 (2): 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kull, C.A., C. Kueffer, D.M. Richardson, A.S. Vaz, J.R. Vicente, and J.P. Honrado. 2017. Using the ‘regime shift’ concept in addressing social-ecological change. Geographical Research.
  52. Larson, B.M.H. 2005. The war of the roses: Demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 3 (9): 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. 2011. Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lave, R., M.W. Wilson, E.S. Barron, C. Biermann, M.A. Carey, C.S. Duvall, L. Johnson, et al. 2014. Intervention: Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 58 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Le Maitre, D.C., B.W. Van Wilgen, C.M. Gelderblom, C. Bailey, R.A. Chapman, and J.L. Nel. 2002. Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: Case studies of the costs and benefits of management. Forest Ecology and Management 160: 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leslie, H.M., and A.P. Kinzig. 2009. Resilience science. In Ecosystem-based management for the oceans, ed. K. McLeod and H.M. Leslie, 55–73. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lidström, S., S. West, T. Katzschner, M.I. Pérez-Ramos, and H. Twidle. 2015. Invasive narratives and the inverse of slow violence: Alien species in science and society. Environmental Humanities 7: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marris, E. 2011. Rambunctious garden: Saving nature in a post-wild world. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  59. McNeely, J.A., ed. 2001. The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  60. Middleton, K. 2012. Renarrating a biological invasion: Historical memory, local communities and ecologists. Environment and History 18: 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mukwada, G., W. Chingombe, and P. Taru. 2016. Strifes of the frontier: An assessment of Acacia mearnsii related park-community conflicts in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park, South Africa. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 13 (1): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murray, D.L. 1994. Cultivating crisis: The human cost of pesticides in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mwangi, E., and B. Swallow. 2008. Prosopis juliflora invasion and rural livelihoods in the Lake Baringo Area of Kenya. Conservation and Society 6 (2): 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Neely, A.H. 2010. Blame it on the weeds: Politics, poverty, and ecology in the New South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (4): 869–887.Google Scholar
  65. Orion, T. 2015. Beyond the war on invasive species: A permaculture approach to ecosystem restoration. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Osborne, M.A. 2000. Acclimatizing the world: A history of the paradigmatic colonial science. Osiris 15: 135–151. 2nd series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pearce, F. 2015. The new wild: Why invasive species will be nature’s salvation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Peretti, J.H. 1998. Nativism and nature: Rethinking biological invasion. Environmental Values 7: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pooley, S. 2014. Burning table mountain: An environmental history of fire on the Cape Peninsula. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rangan, H., A. Wilson, and C.A. Kull. 2014. Thorny problems: Industrial pastoralism and managing ‘country’ in Northwest Queensland. In Rethinking invasion ecologies from the environmental humanities, ed. J. Frawley and I. McCalman, 116–134. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Richardson, D.M., ed. 2011a. Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2011b. Invasion science: The roads travelled and the roads ahead. In Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson, 397–407. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Richardson, D.M., and A. Ricciardi. 2013. Misleading criticisms of invasion science: A field guide. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Richardson, D.M., P. Pyšek, M. Rejmánek, M.G. Barbour, F.D. Panetta, and C.J. West. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6 (2): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richardson, D.M., J.J. Le Roux, and J.R.U. Wilson. 2015. Australian acacias as invasive species: Lessons to be learnt from regions with long planting histories. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science 77 (1): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Robbins, P. 2001. Tracking invasive land covers in India, or why our landscapes have never been modern. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. ———. 2007. Lawn people: How grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  78. ———. 2012. Political ecology: A critical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Russell, J.C., and T.M. Blackburn. 2017. The rise of invasive species denialism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 (1): 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Salomon Cavin, J., and C.A. Kull. 2017. Invasion ecology goes to town: From disdain to sympathy. Biological Invasions 19 (12): 3471–3487.Google Scholar
  81. Sayre, N.F. 2015. The Coyote-proof pasture experiment: How fences replaced predators and labor on US rangelands. Progress in Physical Geography 39 (5): 576–593.Google Scholar
  82. Shackleton, C.M., D. McGarry, S. Fourie, J. Gambiza, S.E. Shackleton, and C. Fabricius. 2007. Assessing the effects of invasive alien species on rural livelihoods: Case examples and a framework from South Africa. Human Ecology 35: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shackleton, R.T., D.C. Le Maitre, and D.M. Richardson. 2015. Stakeholder perceptions and practices regarding Prosopis (mesquite) invasions and management in South Africa. Ambio 44 (6): 569–581.Google Scholar
  84. Simberloff, D. 2003. Confronting introduced species: A form of xenophobia? Biological Invasions 5: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. ———. 2011a. Charles Elton—Neither founder nor siren, but prophet. In Fifty years of invasion ecology, ed. D.M. Richardson, 11–24. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. ———. 2011b. Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475: 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. ———. 2013. Invasive species: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Simberloff, D., J.-L. Martin, P. Genovesi, V. Maris, D.A. Wardle, J. Aronson, F. Courchamp, et al. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28 (1): 58–66.Google Scholar
  89. Subramaniam, B. 2001. The aliens have landed! Reflections on the rhetoric of biological invasions. Meridians: Feminism, race, transnationalism 2 (1): 26–40.Google Scholar
  90. Tassin, J. 2014. La grande invasion: qui a peur des espèces invasives? Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  91. ———. 2017. User de pesticides pour contrôler les espèces invasives: les facettes d’un paradoxe éthique. Revue d’Écologie (Terre et Vie) 72 (4): 425–438.Google Scholar
  92. Tassin, J., and C.A. Kull. 2015. Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Policy 42: 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thompson, K. 2014. Where do Camels belong? Vancouver: Greystone Books.Google Scholar
  94. Turpie, J.K., C. Marais, and J.N. Blignaut. 2008. The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics 65 (4): 788–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vaarzon-Morel, P., and G. Edwards. 2012. Incorporating Aboriginal people’s perceptions of introduced animals in resource management: Insights from the feral camel project. Ecological Management and Restoration 13 (1): 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Valéry, L., H. Fritz, J.-C. Lefeuvre, and D. Simberloff. 2008. In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biological Invasions 10: 1345–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. van Wilgen, B.W., and D.M. Richardson. 2012. Three centuries of managing introduced conifers in South Africa: Benefits, impacts, changing perceptions and conflict resolution. Journal of Environmental Management 106: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. van Wilgen, B.W., A. Khan, and C. Marais. 2011. Changing perspectives on managing biological invasions: Insights from South Africa and the Working for Water Programme. In Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton, ed. D.M. Richardson, 377–393. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  99. Vaz, A.S., C. Kueffer, C.A. Kull, D.M. Richardson, S. Schindler, A.J. Muñoz-Pajares, J.R. Vicente, et al. 2017. The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science. Ambio 46 (4): 428–442.Google Scholar
  100. Warren, C.R. 2007. Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: A critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography 31 (4): 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  102. Wilson, J.R.U., P. García-Díaz, P. Cassey, D.M. Richardson, P. Pyšek, and T.M. Blackburn. 2016. Biological invasions and natural colonisations are different—The need for invasion science. NeoBiota 31: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian A. Kull
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de géographie et durabilité, Université de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations