Advertisement

Green Building and Sustainability: Diffusing Green Building Approaches in the UK and Germany

  • Kirstie O’Neill
  • David Gibbs
Chapter

Abstract

As part of their drive toward a low-carbon economy, governments and other organizations are increasingly focusing their attention on buildings, given that building and construction combined account for some 45 percent of carbon emissions. Targeting new and retrofitted buildings can contribute toward meeting reduced carbon emissions. Drawing on in-depth interviews with policy makers and green building entrepreneurs in Germany and the UK, we focus on the contingent political, economic, and social contexts in the UK and Germany. In particular, we look at the role of these actors in shifting practices and highlight the uneven development of green construction in different geographical contexts. While UK respondents saw Germany as having already made the transition to green building, German businesses and policy makers suggested otherwise. By attending to the experiences of green building entrepreneurs and policy makers in the UK and Germany, we explore their potential as key actors to enact green building transitions.

Keywords

Green building Environmental policy Germany UK 

Further Reading

  1. Gibbs, D., and O’Neill, K. 2015. Building a Green Economy? Sustainability Transitions in the UK Building Sector. Geoforum, 59: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenwood, D. 2012. The Challenge of Policy Coordination for Sustainable Sociotechnical Transitions: The Case of the Zero-Carbon Homes Agenda in England. Environment and Planning C 30: 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Greenwood, D., Congreve, A., and King, M. 2016. The Future of Policy and Standards for Low and Zero Carbon Homes. London: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. www.rics.org.
  4. Mössner, S. 2015. Sustainable Urban Development as Consensual Practice: Post-Politics in Freiberg, Germany. Regional Studies, 50(6): 971–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Aldersgate Group. 2011. Greening the Economy—A Strategy for Growth, Jobs and Success. London: Aldersgate Group.Google Scholar
  2. BERR. 2007. Renewables Advisory Board Annual Report. London: BERR.Google Scholar
  3. BMU, (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit). 2007. Taking Action Against Global Warming: An Overview of German Climate Policy. Berlin: BMVBS.Google Scholar
  4. Boschmann, E.E., and J.N. Gabriel. 2013. Urban Sustainability and the LEED Rating System: Case studies on the Role of Regional Characteristics and Adaptive Reuse in Green Building in Denver and Boulder, Colorado. The Geographical Journal 179 (3): 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, H.S., and P.J. Vergragt. 2008. Bounded Socio-Technical Experiments as Agents of Systemic Change: The Case of a Zero-Energy Residential Building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BVBS. 2010. Building the Future: The Magazine of the Zukunft Bau Research Initiative. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  7. CBI. 2007. Climate Change: Everyone’s Business—A Report from the CBI Climate Change Task Force. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  8. Cutland, N. 2012. Learning from Germany’s Passivhaus Experience. Watford: NHBC.Google Scholar
  9. Darby, S. 2006. Social Learning and Public Policy: Lessons from an Energy-Conscious Village. Energy Policy 34 (17): 2929–2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DCLG. 2006a. Building A Greener Future: Towards Zero Carbon Development. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2006b. Code for Sustainable Homes: A Step Change in Sustainable Home Building Practice. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2008. The Code for Sustainable Homes: Setting the Standard in Sustainability for New Homes. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. DECC. 2011. The Carbon Plan: Delivering Our Low Carbon Future. London: DECC.Google Scholar
  14. Deutsche Bank. 2010. Green Buildings—A Niche Becomes Mainstream. Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank Research.Google Scholar
  15. Disch, R. Undated. The PlusEnergy House for Every Community. Freiburg.Google Scholar
  16. Doyle, T. 2005. Environmental Movements in Minority and Majority Worlds: A Global Perspective. New Brunswick: Rutgers’ University Press.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2011. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050, COM 112 final, European Commission: Brussels.Google Scholar
  18. Fastenrath, S., and B. Braun. 2016. Sustainability Transition Pathways in the Building Sector: Energy Efficient Building in Freiburg (Germany) [Online first]. Applied Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004.
  19. Fischer, J., and S. Guy. 2009. Re-interpreting Regulations: Architects as Intermediaries for Low Carbon Buildings. Urban Studies 46 (12): 2577–2594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galvin, R. 2010. Thermal Upgrades of Existing Homes in Germany: The Building Code, Subsidies, and Economic Efficiency. Energy and Buildings 42 (6): 834–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galvin, R., and M. Sunikka-Blank. 2013. Economic Viability in Thermal Retrofit Policies: Learning from Ten Years of Experience in Germany. Energy Policy 54: 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case Study. Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio Technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geels, F.W., and R. Raven. 2006. Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbs, D., and K. O’Neill. 2014. Rethinking Socio-Technical Transitions and Green Entrepreneurship: The Potential for Transformative Change in the Green Building Sector. Environment and Planning A 46 (5): 1088–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2015. Building a Green Economy? Sustainability Transitions in the UK Building Sector. Geoforum 59: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood, D., A. Congreve, and M. King. 2016. The Future of Policy and Standards for Low and Zero Carbon Homes. London: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. www.rics.org.Google Scholar
  28. Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hartenberger, U. 2011. Why Buildings Matter: Making Homes and Offices Sustainable Has a Direct Impact on the Way We Live and How We Use Natural Resources. The Guardian, July 1.Google Scholar
  30. Hinrichs, C.C. 2014. Transitions to Sustainability: A Change in Thinking About Food Systems Change. Agriculture and Human Values 31: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. HM Treasury and BIS. 2011. The Plan for Growth. London: HM Government.Google Scholar
  32. Hodson, M., E. Burrai, and C. Barlow. 2016. Remaking the Material Fabric of the City: ‘Alternative’ Low Carbon Spaces of Transformation or Continuity? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18: 128–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kill, J., S. Ozinga, S. Pavett, and R. Wainwright. 2010. Trading Carbon: How It Works and Why It Is Controversial. Brussels: FERN.Google Scholar
  35. Lafferty, W., and E. Hovden. 2010. Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework. Environmental Politics 12 (3): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marres, N. 2013. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  37. Mason, K. 2013. Justice in Building, Building in Justice: The Reconstruction of Intra-Generational Equity in Framings of Sustainability in the Eco-Building Movement. Environmental Values 32 (1): 99–118.Google Scholar
  38. McLeod, R., C. Hopfe, and Y. Rezgui. 2012. An Investigation into Recent Proposals for a Revised Definition of Zero Carbon Homes in the UK. Energy Policy 46: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McManus, A., M. Gaterell, and L. Coates. 2010. The Potential of the Code for Sustainable Homes to Deliver Genuine ‘Sustainable Energy’ in the UK Social Housing Sector. Energy Policy 38: 2013–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mössner, S., and T. Freytag. 2013. Questioning the Green City Model: A Critical Perspective on Sustainable Urban Development in Freiburg. Paper presented at Regional Studies Network seminar, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  41. Mössner, S. 2015. Sustainable Urban Development as Consensual Practice: Post-Politics in Freiberg, Germany. Regional Studies 50 (6): 971–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nilsson, M., and A. Persson. 2003. Framework for Analysing Environmental Policy Integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5 (4): 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Neill, K., and D. Gibbs. 2014. Towards a Sustainable Economy? Socio-Technical Transitions in the Green Building Sector. Local Environment 19 (6): 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Owen, A., G. Mitchell, and A. Gouldson. 2014. Unseen Influence—The Role of Low Carbon Retrofit Advisers and Installers in the Adoption and Use of Domestic Energy Technology. Energy Policy 73: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Preller, B., J. Affolderbach, C. Schulz, S. Fastenrath, and B. Braun. 2017. Interactive Knowledge Generation in Urban Green Building Transitions. The Professional Geographer 69 (2): 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raman, S., and E. Shove. 2000. The Business of Building Regulation. In The Business of Greening, ed. S. Fineman, 134–150. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Schot, J., and F.W. Geels. 2008. Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda and Policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seyfang, G. 2010. Community Action for Sustainable Housing: Building a Low Carbon Future. Energy Policy 38: 7624–7633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, A. 2003. Transforming Technological Regimes for Sustainable Development: A Role for Alternative Technology Niches? Science and Public Policy 30 (2): 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ———. 2006. Governance Lessons from Green Niches: The Case of Eco-Housing. In Governing Technology for Sustainability, ed. J. Murphy, 89–109. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2007. Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4): 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sustainable Development Commission. 2006. Stock Take: Delivering Improvements in Existing Housing. London: SDC.Google Scholar
  54. Tofield, B. 2012. Delivering a Low-Energy Building: Making Quality Commonplace. Norwich: ADAPT Low Carbon Group.Google Scholar
  55. Tweed, C. 2013. Socio-Technical Issues in Dwelling Retrofit. Building Research and Information 41 (5): 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. UNEP. 2016. Global Roadmap: Towards Low GHG and Resilient Buildings. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  57. Vickers, I., and P. Vaze. 2009. SMEs in a Low Carbon Economy: Final Report for BERR Enterprise Directorate. London: Middlesex University. http://www.raeng.org.uk/education/vps/pdf/Engineering_a_low_carbon_built_environment.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2012.
  58. Weaver, W. 2006. Brown Pledges to Build Zero Carbon Homes. The Guardian, December 6. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2006/dec/06/politics.greenpolitics. Accessed 14 June 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirstie O’Neill
    • 1
  • David Gibbs
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography and EnvironmentLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Geography, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations