Activity-Driven Influence Maximization in Social Networks

  • Rohit KumarEmail author
  • Muhammad Aamir Saleem
  • Toon Calders
  • Xike Xie
  • Torben Bach Pedersen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10536)


Interaction networks consist of a static graph with a time-stamped list of edges over which interaction took place. Examples of interaction networks are social networks whose users interact with each other through messages or location-based social networks where people interact by checking in to locations. Previous work on finding influential nodes in such networks mainly concentrate on the static structure imposed by the interactions or are based on fixed models for which parameters are learned using the interactions. In two recent works, however, we proposed an alternative activity data driven approach based on the identification of influence propagation patterns. In the first work, we identify so-called information-channels to model potential pathways for information spread, while the second work exploits how users in a location-based social network check in to locations in order to identify influential locations. To make our algorithms scalable, approximate versions based on sketching techniques from the data streams domain have been developed. Experiments show that in this way it is possible to efficiently find good seed sets for influence propagation in social networks.



This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS under Grant(s) no. T.0183.14 PDR. Xike Xie is supported by the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


  1. 1.
    Flajolet, P., Fusy, É., Gandouet, O., Meunier, F.: Hyperloglog: the analysis of a near-optimal cardinality estimation algorithm. In: DMTCS Proceedings (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., Lakshmanan, L.V.: A data-based approach to social influence maximization. Proc. VLDB Endowment 5(1), 73–84 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: KDD (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, R., Calders, T.: Information propagation in interaction networks. In: EDBT (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar, R., Calders, T., Gionis, A., Tatti, N.: Maintaining sliding-window neighborhood profiles in interaction networks. In: Appice, A., Rodrigues, P.P., Santos Costa, V., Gama, J., Jorge, A., Soares, C. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9285, pp. 719–735. Springer, Cham (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In: KDD (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saleem, M.A., Kumar, R., Calders, T., Xie, X., Pedersen, T.B.: Location influence in location-based social networks. In: WSDM (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rohit Kumar
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Muhammad Aamir Saleem
    • 1
    • 2
  • Toon Calders
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xike Xie
    • 5
  • Torben Bach Pedersen
    • 2
  1. 1.Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  3. 3.Universiteit AntwerpenAntwerpBelgium
  4. 4.Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech)BarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations