Advertisement

Establishing Departmental Mentorship Programs

  • Steven M. Steinberg
Chapter
Part of the Success in Academic Surgery book series (SIAS)

Abstract

All academic medical departments and colleges of medicine wish to have their faculty perform at the highest possible levels in order to achieve both individual and organizational academic, educational, and clinical goals. Having a mentorship program to provide advice to junior faculty members in the hope of improving performance has come into vogue. There is objective evidence to support the use of mentorship programs for this purpose. However, I would suggest that, while mentoring relationships are an important aspect in assisting faculty members to achieve their goals, they are not sufficient in most instances. Isolated mentorship matching programs frequently lack structure, commonly have problems with creating the best possible mentor-mentee dyads, usually lack accountability, and have few objective outcome metrics. The most successful programs include a clear set of organizational goals, an infrastructure to support the programmatic functions, the ability to teach important professional skills, and a system of metrics to determine whether the program is actually succeeding along with mentor matching. There are many examples of what appear to be successful programs existing in academic departments. There are fewer that cross departments and serve entire colleges of medicine or universities. Clearly, the larger the organization such faculty development programs encompass, the more resources they have and the more sophisticated they can become.

Keywords

Mentor Mentorship Faculty Development 

Suggested References

  1. 1.
    Bauman M, Howell L, Villablanca A. The women in medicine and health science program: an innovative initiative to support female Faculty at the University of California Davis School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2014;89:1462–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beasley H, Ghousseini H, Wiegmann D, et al. Strategies for building peer surgical coaching relationships. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):e165540.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brod H, Lemeshow S, Binkley P. Determinants of faculty departure in an Academic Medical Center: a time to event analysis. Am J Med. 2017;130:488–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campion M, Bhasin R, Beaudette D, et al. Mid-career faculty development in academic medicine: how does it impact faculty and institutional vitality? J Fac Dev. 2016;30:49–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalton D. 7 reasons why mentoring programs fail. http://3plusinternational.com/2016/10/mentoring-programmes-fail/ (2016). Accessed May 23 2017.
  6. 6.
    Fertig A, Tew J, Douaihy A, et al. Developing a clinician educator faculty development program: lessons learned. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41:417–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleming G, Simmons J, Xu M, et al. A facilitated peer mentoring program for junior faculty to promote professional development and peer networking. Acad Med. 2015;90:819–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freel S, Smith P, Burns E, et al. Multidisciplinary mentoring programs to enhance junior faculty research grant success. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1410–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001620. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gusic M, Zenni E, Ludwig S, et al. Strategies to design an effective mentoring program. J Pediatr. 2010;156:173–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hindman B, Dexter F, Todd M. Research, education, and nonclinical service productivity of new junior anesthesia faculty during a 2-year faculty development program. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:194–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    HR Nasty.: Are mentor programs failing us? http://hrnasty.com/mentor-programs/ (2015). Accessed May 23 2017.
  12. 12.
    Kibbe M, Pellegrini C, Townsend C, et al. Characterization of mentorship programs in departments of surgery in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:900–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim D, Hwang J, Lee S, et al. Institutional factors affecting participation in national faculty development programs: a nation-wide investigation of medical schools. BMC Med Educ 2017;17(1): 48 https://dx-doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.1186%2Fs12909-017-0888-1.
  14. 14.
    Kostrubiak D, Kwon M, Lee J, et al. Mentorship in radiology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017;S0363–0188(17):30034–8.  https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.02.008. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parise M, Forret M. Formal mentoring programs: the relationship of program design and support to mentors’ perceptions of benefits and costs. J Vocat Behav. 2008;72:225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramani S, Gruppen L, Kachur EK. Twelve tips for developing effective mentors. Medical Teacher. 2006;28(5):404–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600825326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryan R. Five reasons mentoring programs fail. http://www.rebeccaryan.com/five-reasons-mentoring-programs-fail/ (2010). Accessed May 23 2017.
  18. 18.
    Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine. JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandman JJ. From the President: why formal mentoring programs often fail – and how to help them succeed. https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/publications/washington-lawyer/articles/october-2006-from-the-president.cfm (2006). Accessed May 23 2017.
  20. 20.
    Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 19. Medical Teacher. 2012;34:483–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tracy E, Jagsi R, Starr R, et al. Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1846–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsen L, Borus J, Nadelson C, et al. The development, implementation, and assessment of an innovative faculty mentoring leadership program. Acad Med. 2012;87:1757–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weber R, Cable C, Wehbe-Janek H. Learner perspectives of a surgical educators faculty development program regarding value and effectiveness: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1057–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weisbrod M, Wong A, Mcreelis K, et al. Faculty development: a new model based on faculty needs for an academic department of ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51:190–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zakrison T, Polk T, Dixon R, et al. Paying it forward: four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma mentoring program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:165–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations