Advertisement

“I Have Learned that I Must Think Twice Before…”. An Educational Intervention for Enhancing Students’ Privacy Awareness in Facebook

  • Maria Sideri
  • Angeliki Kitsiou
  • Eleni Tzortzaki
  • Christos KalloniatisEmail author
  • Stefanos Gritzalis
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 792)

Abstract

Social Network Sites have doubtless become part of our lives, facilitating communication and interaction between social actors. Within this frame users disclose personal information for several reasons while at the same time they express privacy concerns. “Privacy Paradox” reveals that despite privacy concerns, users, most of the times, fail to protect their privacy within SNSs, putting thus themselves and other users to risk. In this respect, several researches have shown that users’ privacy awareness increase is of major importance, focusing on the crucial role of education towards this. This research aims to explore the effects of a long-term University-based educational intervention for enhancing students’ digital knowledge and skills in order to protect their privacy in SNSs efficiently. The educational intervention centered on a semester course of a Greek University, provides encouraging findings regarding students’ privacy awareness enhancement.

Keywords

Social network sites Facebook Privacy concerns Privacy awareness Educational intervention Semester course 

References

  1. 1.
    Lin, K.Y., Lu, H.P.: Why people use social networking sites: an empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(3), 1152–1161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pearson, E.: All the world wide web’s a stage: the performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday 14(3) (2009). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2162/2127. Accessed Feb 2017
  3. 3.
    Buschel, I., Mehdi, R., Cammilleri, A., Marzouki, Y., Elger, B.: Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the “privacy paradox”? Sci. Eng. Ethics 20, 639–658 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dienlin, T., Trepte, S.: Putting the social (psychology) into social media is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 45, 285–297 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartsch, M., Dienlin, T.: Control your Facebook: an analysis of online privacy literacy. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 147–154 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baek, Y.M.: Solving the privacy paradox: a counter-argument experimental approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 33–42 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, Y.J.: Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Commun. Res. 40(2), 215–236 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moll, R., Pieschl, S., Bromme, R.: Competent or clueless? Users’ knowledge and misconceptions about their online privacy management. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 212–219 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, R.: Living a private life in public social networks: an exploration of member self-disclosure. Decis. Support Syst. 55, 661–668 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P.K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., Lind, F.: Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS). In: Gutwirth, S., Leenes, R., de Hert, P. (eds.) Reforming European data protection law, pp. 333–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marcolin, B.L., Compeau, D.R., Munro, M.C., Huff, S.L.: Assessing user competence: conceptualization and measurement. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(1), 37–60 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mendel, T., Puddephatt, A., Wagner, B., Hawtin, D., Torres, N.: Global Survey on Internet Privacy and Freedom of Expression. Unesco Publishing, France (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taneja, A., Vitrano, J., Gengo, N.J.: Rationality-based beliefs affecting individual’s attitude and intention to use privacy controls on Facebook: an empirical investigation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 159–173 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marino, C., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., Albery, I., Frings, D., Spada, M.M.: Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents. Addict. Behav. 63, 51–56 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Valcke, M.: Exploring the usefulness of school education about risks on social network sites: a survey study. J. Media Liter. Educ. 5(1), 285–294 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., Valcke, M.: Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: a design based research approach. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 64, 459–480 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Valcke, M.: Educating teens about the risks on social network sites: an intervention study in secondary education. Communicar Sci. J. Media Educ. 43(XXII), 123–131 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Rey, R., Casas, J.A., Ortega, R.: The ConRed program, an evidence based practice. Communicar Sci. J. Media Educ. 39(XX), 129–137 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M.-J., MacFadden, R.: Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: a systematic review. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 21(1), 5–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steinke, J., Lapinski, M.K., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., Evergreen, S.H., Kuchibhotla, S.: Assessing media influences on middle school–aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST). Sci. Commun. 29(1), 35–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Livingstone, S., Bulger, M.E.: A global agenda for children’s rights in the digital age. Recommendations for developing UNICEF’s research strategy. LSE, London (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greek Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs. Curriculum and instructions for teaching “Information and Communication Technologies” in Primary Education during the school year 2016–17. https://app.box.com/s/kwepcz32fe7nu03b73xun3t0tgobwqts. (in greek)
  23. 23.
    Greek Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs. Instructions for teaching Informatics in Secondary Education during the school year 2016–17. https://app.box.com/s/ey2r6cy4y5d4ffdu2jkor80wmj7m1l60. (in greek)
  24. 24.
    Williams, D.: On and off the’net: scales for social capital in an online era. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 11(2), 593–628 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., Hildebrand, T.: Online social networks: why we disclose. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 109–125 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.K., Hughes, B.N.: Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 15, 83–108 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G.: Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(3), 340–347 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taddicken, M., Jers, C.: The uses of privacy online: trading a loss of privacy for social web gratifications? In: Trepte, S., Reinecke, L. (eds.) Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web, pp. 143–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stutzman, F., Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Silent listeners: the evolution of privacy and disclosure on facebook. J. Priv. Confid. 4(2), 7–41 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sideri, M., Kitsiou, A., Kalloniatis, C., Gritzalis, S.: Privacy and facebook universities students’ communities for confessions and secrets: the greek case. In: Katsikas, S.K., Sideridis, A.B. (eds.) e-Democracy 2015. CCIS, vol. 570, pp. 77–94. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27164-4_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnson, M., Egelman, S., Bellovin, S.M.: Facebook and privacy: it’s complicated. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2012), pp. 1–15. ACM, Washington (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lawler, J.P., Molluzzo, J.C.: A study of the perceptions of students on privacy and security on social networking sites (SNS), on the internet. J. Inf. Syst. Appl. Res. 3(12), 3–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen, M., Bin, Y.S., Campbell, A.: Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(2), 103–111 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bourdieu, P.: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Sideri
    • 1
  • Angeliki Kitsiou
    • 1
  • Eleni Tzortzaki
    • 2
  • Christos Kalloniatis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefanos Gritzalis
    • 2
  1. 1.Privacy Engineering and Social Informatics Laboratory, Department of Cultural Technology and CommunicationUniversity of the AegeanLesvosGreece
  2. 2.Information and Communication Systems Security Laboratory, Department of Information and Communications Systems EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanSamosGreece

Personalised recommendations