Empathy and Anti-Empathy: Which Are the Problems?

  • Michela SummaEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 94)


This chapter has two related aims. The first one is to bring to the fore the potential of a ‘multi-layered’ account of empathy. The second one is to clarify the role of imagination in empathy, with particular attention to the process of ‘centrally imagining’ what the other is experiencing. The argument is based on the comparison between Peter Goldie’s and Edith Stein’s accounts of empathy. As to the first point, I will show that Goldie’s rather sophisticated concept of empathy already presupposes basic layers of understanding, which are more thoroughly clarified in Stein’s analyses. As to the second point, I will argue that empathy, in its different layers, significantly relies on imagination, and more precisely on ‘central imagining’. In order to clarify the meaning of ‘central imagining’, without incurring into either conceptual and phenomenological paradoxes or ethically dubious statements, a closer consideration of how the imagining subject is and can be involved in interpersonal perspectival shift is required.


Empathy Perception Imagination Central imagining Perspective 


  1. Calcagno, Antonio. 2014. Lived experience from the inside out: Social and political philosophy in Edith Stein. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Currie, Gregory, and Ian Ravenscroft. 2002. Recreative minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Vignemont, Fréderique, and Pierre Jacob. 2012. What is it like to feel another’s pain? Philosophy of Science 79 (2): 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dullstein, Monika. 2013. Direct perception and simulation: Stein’s account of empathy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2): 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flatscher, Matthias. 2013. Grenzen der Einfühlung. Zum Problem der Alterität bei Husserl und Levinas. In Grenzen der Empathie Philosophische, psychologische und anthropologische Perspektiven, ed. Thiemo Breyer, 183–213. München: Fink.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, Shaun. 2001. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5–7): 83–108.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2012. In defense of phenomenological approaches to social cognition: Interacting with the critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2): 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallese, Vittorio. 2003. The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldie, Peter. 2000. The emotions. A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. Anti-empathy. In Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, ed. Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie, 302–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldman, Alvin. 1989. Interpretation psychologized. Mind & Language 4 (3): 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 1992. Empathy, mind, and morals. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (3): 17–41.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2006. Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Husserl, Edmund. 1950. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1956. Erste Philosophie 1923/24. Zweiter Teil. Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktion. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1973a. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil (1929–1935). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 1973b. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil (1905–1920). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 1973c. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil (1921–1928). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 1980. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  22. Jansen, Julia. 2005. On the development of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology of imagination and its use for interdisciplinary research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 121–132.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2010. Phenomenology, imagination and interdisciplinary research. In Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences, ed. Shaun Gallagher and Daniel Schmicking, 141–158. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Overgaard, Søren. 2007. Wittgenstein and Other Minds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2006. Folk psychology’ is not folk psychology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2007. Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk-psychology, theory of mind, and simulation. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryle, Gilbert. 2009. The concept of mind. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Scheler, Max. 1973. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern/München: Francke.Google Scholar
  29. Stein, Edith. 2008. Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1970. Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychologie und der Geisteswissenschaften. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  31. Stueber, Karsten. 2006. Rediscovering empathy: Agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Summa, Michela. 2014. Spatio-temporal intertwining. Husserl’s transcendental aesthetic. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2015. Are emotions ‘recollected in tranquility’? Phenomenological reflections on emotions, memory, and the temporal dynamics of experience. In Edmund Husserl on: Feeling and value, willing and action, ed. Marta Ubiali and Maren Wehrle. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Svenaeus, Frederik. 2015. The phenomenology of empathy: A Steinian emotional account. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences online first.Google Scholar
  35. Taipale, Joona. 2016. From types to tokens: Empathy and typification. In Phenomenology of sociality. Discovering the ‘we’, ed. Thomas Szanto and Dermot Moran, 143–158. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Vendrell Ferran, Ingrid. 2015. Empathy, emotional sharing and feelings in Stein’s early work. Human Studies 38 (4): 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1997. Topographie des Fremden. Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden. I. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2000. Das leibliche Selbst. Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des Leibes. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2015. Sozialität und Alterität. Modi sozialer Erfahrung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  40. Wollheim, Richard. 1984. The thread of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Zahavi, Dan. 2014a. Empathy and other directed intentionality. Topoi. An International Review of Philosophy 33 (1): 129–142.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2014b. Self and other. Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations