Advertisement

Liminal Worlds: Presence and Performer Agency in Tele-Collaborative Interaction

  • Roger MillsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

This chapter explores theories of presence, and performer agency in tele-collaborative interaction, and their application to intercultural tele-improvisation. It examines theories of listening and perception in distributed performance contexts and considers issues of spatiality, temporality and time consciousness. Included in this investigation are practitioner perspectives and examples from case study performance that reveal how participants conceptualised networked space and time as the activity of the music, rather than being external to it. The chapter concludes by reviewing definitions of networked space, third space, and cyberspace, and how our perception and cognition of online space occurs through the actions and social practices (e.g., improvisation) with which we engage.

References

  1. Aristotle (2014) Complete works of Aristotle, Volume 1: The revised Oxford translation (J. Barnes Ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Balkwill LI, Thompson WF (1999) A cross-cultural investigation of the perception of emotion in music: psychophysical and cultural clues. Music Percept 17(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastin T, Kilmister CW (2009) The origin of discrete particles, vol 42. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti S, Gregory A (2000) Cross-cultural study of affective responses to Qawwali. Paper presented at the ICMPC 2000: Sixth international conference on music perception and cognition, Keele, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthes R (1985) The responsibility of forms. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Békésy GV (1960) Experiments in hearing, 1st edn. Mcgraw Hill, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Breyer T, Ehmer O, Pfänder S (2011) Improvisation, temporality and emergent constructions. In: Peter Auer SP (ed) Constructions: emerging and emergent. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, pp 186–217Google Scholar
  8. Broadie S (2012) Nature and divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Butera M (2011) Sound for thought: listening as metabolism. Sound Eff 1(1):53–64Google Scholar
  10. Byrne D (2012) How music works. Cannongate, Edinburgh, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cascone K (2013) Subtle listening: how artists can develop new perceptual circuits. Retrieved from http://sonicfield.org/2014/03/subtle-listening-how-artists-can-develop-new-perceptual-circuits/
  12. Chafe C, Gurevich M, Leslie G, Tyan S (2004) Effect of time delay on ensemble accuracy. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on musical acoustics, 31 Mar to 3 April 2004, Nara, JapanGoogle Scholar
  13. Chion M (1994) Audio-Vision: sound on screen (C. Gorbman Ed.). Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen JE (2007) Cyberspace as/and space. Columbia Law Rev 107(1):210–256Google Scholar
  15. Coleridge ST (2013, 1817) Bibliographia Literaria. Retrieved from Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/6081/6081-h/6081-h.htm
  16. Couclelis H, Gale N (1986) Space and spaces. Geografiska Annaler. Ser B, Human Geogr 68(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crossley N (2001) The social body: habit, identity and desire. SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi IS (1988) Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox A (2001) The mimetic hypothesis and embodied musical meaning. Musicae Scientiae 5(195)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox A (2011) Embodying music: principles of the mimetic hypothesis. Soc Music Theor 17(2)Google Scholar
  21. Davies C (2004) Virtual space. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Derrida J (1973) Speech and phenomena, and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs. North Western University Press, New York (D. B. Allison, Trans. J. Wild Ed.)Google Scholar
  23. Drake, Bertrand D (2001) The quest for universals in temporal processing in music. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drake C, El Heni JB (2003) Synchronizing with music: intercultural differences. Ann N Y Acad Sci 999:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eno B (1996) A year with Swollen appendices. Faber and Faberm, London.Google Scholar
  26. Eno B (1982) Ambient 4: on land. Editions EG, Virgin Records, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Fields K (2017) Interview with the author/Interviewer: R. MillsGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2014) Primal impression and enactive perception. In: Arstila V, Lloyd D (eds) Subjective time: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 83–99Google Scholar
  29. Ganburged B (2012) Video cue recall interview/interviewer: R. Mills. University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson W (1984) Neuromancer. Ace Science Fiction, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon EE (1999) All about audiation and music aptitudes: Edwin E. Gordon discusses using audiation and music aptitudes as teaching tools to allow students to reach their full music potential. Music Educators J 86(41):41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gordon EE (2001) Preparatory audiation, audiation, and music learning theory: a handbook of a comprehensive music learning sequence. GIA Publications, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. Grimshaw M, Garner T (2015) Sonic virtuality: sound as emergent perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gunawarddena C, Zittle JF (1997) Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am J Distance Educ 11(3):8–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanlon M (2012) Post performance video cue recall/interviewer: R. Mills. University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  36. Heidegger M (1962) Being and time (J. Macquarie & E. Robinson, Trans. 7th ed.). Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Heidegger M (2018) Ontology: hermeneutics of facticity (K. Bröcker-Oltmanns Ed. 3rd ed.). Vittorio Klostermann, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Helmholtz HLF (1875/2011) On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (AJ Ellis, Trans). Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Husserl E (1964) Phenomenology of internal time consciousness (J. S. Churchill, Trans. M. Heidegger Ed.). Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Husserl E (1999) The essential Husserl: basic writings in transcendental phenomenology (D. Welton Ed.). Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Ihde D (2007) Listening and voice: phenomenologies of sound. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson M (1987) The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson M (2008) The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago University Press, Chicago and LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Juslin PN, Laukka P (2003) Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code. Psychol Bull 129(5):770–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Juslin PN, Trimmers R (2010) Expression and communication of emotion in music performance. In: Juslin PN, Sloboda JA (eds) Music and emotion: theory, research, applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 453–489Google Scholar
  46. Kant I (1998) Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans. P. Guyer, A. W. Wood Eds.). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Kehrwald B (2010) Democratic rationalisation on the network: social presence and human agency in networked learning. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on networked learning. Aalborg, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  48. LaBelle B (2006) Background noise: perspectives on sound art. Continuum Books, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  50. Landy L, Atkinson S, Farra RD, Weale R, Couprie P (2001) Reduced listening. EARS: ElectroAcoustic Resource Site. http://www.ears.dmu.ac.uk/spip.php?rubrique219. Accessed 3 Aug 2017
  51. Leante L (2013) Imagery, movement and listeners’ construction of meaning in north indian classical music. In Clayton M, Dueck B, Leante L (eds) Experience and meaning in music performance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 161–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. McMahan A (2003) Immersion, engagement, and presence: a method for analysing 3-D video games. In: Wolf MJP, Perron B (eds) The video game theory reader. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  54. Merleau-Ponty M (2005) Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M (2002) Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Nancy J-L (2007) Listening (C. Mandell, Trans.). Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Nowak K (2001) Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. Paper presented at the Presence 2001 conference. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  58. Nowak KL, Biocca F (2003) The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence 12(5):481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neumark N, Gibson R, van Leeuwen T (2010) Voice: vocal aesthetics in digital arts and media. MIT Press, Cambridge and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliveros P (2005) Deep listening: a composers sound practice. Deep Listening Publications, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  61. Packer R (2017) Activating the third space. Retrieved from https://thirdspacenetwork.com/activating-the-third-space/
  62. Peirce C (1991) Peirce on signs: writings on semiotic by Charles Peirce. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, London. Pinheiro, D. (2017). [Personal email correspondance]Google Scholar
  63. Perez H (2012) Video cue recall interview/interviewer: R. Mills. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Google Scholar
  64. Pickles JO (1988) An introduction to the physiology of hearing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Pinheiro D (2017) Personal email correspondance. R. Mills and A. AbrahamsGoogle Scholar
  66. Purdy MW (1986) Listening research & philosophical hermeneutics. Paper presented at the International Listening Association, San Diego, March 1986Google Scholar
  67. Roth WM (2012) Hearing and listening. First-Person Methods Pract Res Method 3:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saunders C, Rutkowski AF, Genuchten MV, Vogel D, Orrego JM (2011) Virtual space and place: theory and test. Mis Q 35(4):1079–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sayyadi P (2012) Video cue recall interview/interviewer: R. Mills. University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  70. Schaeffer P (1966) Traité des objets musicaux. Éditions du Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  71. Schaeffer P (1967) La musique concrète. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  72. Schafer RM (1994) The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Destiny Books, Rochester, VermontGoogle Scholar
  73. Schrader C, Bastiaens T (2012) Relations between the tendency to invest in virtual presence, actual virtual presence, and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Int J Human-Comput Inter 28(12):775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schroeder F, Rebelo P (2009) Sounding the network: the body as disturbant. Leonardo Electron Almanac 16(4–5):1–9Google Scholar
  75. Schroeder F (2013) Network[ed] listening—towards a de-centering of beings. Contemp Music Rev 32(2–3):215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sermon P, Gould C (2015) Peoples screen: telematic public art installation Guangzhou, China: Perth, Australia: Public Art Lab Berlin: Connecting CitiesGoogle Scholar
  77. Sheridan TB (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1(1):120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Short JA, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Slawig M (2012) Video cue recall interview/interviewer: R. Mills. University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  80. Sloboda J (2005) Exploring the musical mind: cognition, emotion, ability, function. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Slowik E (2002) Cartesian space time: descartes’ physics and the relational theory of space and motion. Springer Science + Business Media, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith LD, Williams RN (1999) Children’s artistic responses to musical intervals. Am J Psychol 112(3):383–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Soja EW (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell, Massachusetts, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Steuer J (1994) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. In: Biocca F, Levy M (eds) Communication in the age of virtual reality. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  85. Thoresen L (2012) Sound, pattern, and structure: novel methods for analysing music-as-heard. Paper presented at the Anais Do II Simpom 2012 Simposio Brasileiro de Pos-Graduanos em Musica Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 1–20. http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/simpom. Accessed 19 July 2017
  86. Van Leeuwen T (1999) Speech, music, sound. Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Van Nort D (2016) Distributed listening in electroacoustic improvisation. Leonardo Music J 26:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Voegelin S (2010) Listening to noise and silence: towards a philosophy of sound art. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. Weiss G (1999) Body images: embodiment as intercorporeality. Routledge, New York, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Whalley I (2012) Internet2 and global electroacoustic music: navigating a decision space of production, relationships and languages. Organised Sound 17(1):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whalley I (2017) Interview with author/Interviewer: R. MillsGoogle Scholar
  92. Whalley I (2018) Personal Correspondence. R. MillsGoogle Scholar
  93. Witmer B, Singer M (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 7(3):225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zacharopoulou K, Kyriakidou A (2009) A cross-cultural comparative study of the role of musical structural features in the perception of emotion in greek traditional music. J Interdisc Music Stud 3(1 & 2):1–15Google Scholar
  95. Zahavi D (2003) Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  96. Zavada I (2017) Interview with the author/Interviewer: R. MillsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations