Advertisement

Energy Performance Simulation and Evaluation of Various Construction Types for a Residential Building (International ODOO Project)

  • Norbert HarmathyEmail author
  • Jenő Kontra
  • Vera Murgul
  • Zoltán Magyar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 692)

Abstract

The Hungarian ODOO residential building project has achieved an outstanding result on the international Solar Decathlon Competition which is an international innovation competition between the best universities all around the world, organized by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Spanish Government since 2002. The goal of the contest is to popularize the usage of solar energy in architectural solutions and to call into being the social and market support of green technologies. The Hungarian ODOO project according to the total scoring reached the 6th place from 18 participant countries. In the categories of Engineering and construction, and Comfort conditions it won the 2nd place and in energy efficiency category the 3rd place.

The presented research motivation was to investigate the efficient utilization of the existing ODOO building and to assess project quality from the aspect of energy efficiency, building construction characteristics and envelope glazing properties. In order to achieve a detailed understanding of the energy demands and construction-component-operation interaction we utilized multi-zone energy modeling and dynamic energy simulation software. The results presented that the final energy performance can be strategically influenced if a synergetic and deterministic methodological approach is applied.

Keywords

Energy management Transport buildings and structures Energy performance simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This article is linked to the “Solar Decathlon Competition for investigating efficient utilization of the BME ODOO project’s professional objectives”. The project is supported by the New Széchenyi Plan ED_13-1-2013-0005 program.

References

  1. 1.
    ODOO. http://www.odooproject.com/hu/house/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  2. 2.
    ŠijanecZavrl, M., Stegnar, G., Rakušček, A., Gjerkeš, H.: A bottom-up building stock model for tracking regional energy targets – a case study of Kočevlje Sustainability, 8(10), 1–16 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101063
  3. 3.
    Kmekováa, J., Krajčík, M.: Energy efficient retrofit and life cycle assessment of an apartment building. Energy Procedia 78, 3186–3191 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.11.778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pukhkal, V., Tanic, M., Vatin, N., Murgul, V.: Studying humidity conditions in the design of building envelopes of passive house (in the case of Serbia). Procedia Eng. 117, 859–864 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szabó, L.: Effect of architectural glazing parameters, shading, thermal mass and night ventilation on public building energy consumption under hungarian climate. PeriodicaPolytechnica – Civ. Eng. 59(2), 209–223 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7091 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sacht, H., Braganca, L., Almeida, M., Caram, R.: Glazing daylighting performance and trombe wall thermal performance of a modular facade system in four different Portuguese cities. Indoor Built Environ. 24(4), 544–563 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14525976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harmathy, N., Magyar, Z., Folic, R.: Multi-criterion optimization of building envelope in the function of indoor illumination quality towards overall energy performance improvement. Energy 114, 302–317 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gang, W., Wang, S., Xiao, F., Gao, D.: Robust optimal design of building cooling systems considering cooling load uncertainty and equipment reliability. Appl. Energy 159, 265–275 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krstic-Furundzic, A., Kosic, T.: Assessment of energy and environmental performance of office building models: a case study. Energy Build. 115, 11–22 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eui-Jong, K., Plessis, G., Jean-Luc, H., Jean-Jacques, R.: Urban energy simulation: simplification and reduction of building envelope models. Energy Build. 84, 193–202 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OpenStudio. https://www.openstudio.net/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  12. 12.
    SketchUp. http://www.sketchup.com/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  13. 13.
    EnergyPlus. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  14. 14.
    Meteonorm. http://www.meteonorm.com/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  15. 15.
    KLH. http://www.klh.at/en/product/klh/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  16. 16.
    Wienergbergerporortherm. http://www.wienerberger.com/products-brands. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Hungarian TNM 7/2006V. 24 regulation on the energy efficiency of builings. https://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0600007.TNM. Accessed 27 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building Energetics and Building Service Engineering, Faculty of ArchitectureBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Moscow State University of Civil EngineeringMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations