Beyond Emergence: Learning from Dooyeweerdian Anthropology?

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 3)

Abstract

In dialogue with Gerrit Glas’ contribution to this volume, this chapter interacts with two clusters of concepts of emergence, drawing on Dooyeweerdian insights in order to provide a thorough critique of them and to provide an alternative proposal. It starts from the concept of emergence as used today in analytical philosophy of mind, discussing Jaegwon Kim’s critical work on emergence, Philip Clayton’s emergentist “ontological monism,” and non-reductive physicalism. Drawing on Dooyeweerd’s modal aspects, I conclude that this type of emergence cannot fulfil the promise of providing a satisfactory non-reductive view. The chapter then discusses a concept of emergence used in the context of phenomenology and developed by a group of philosophers inspired by Francisco Varela. Proponents of this second approach share some concerns with a Dooyeweerdian-inspired critique of analytical emergence, but their explicit stance against creation leads them to develop co-emergence in accordance with Buddhist “emptiness.” This chapter then examines Dooyeweerd’s refusal of mind−body dualism, linked to his rejection of the concept of substance and “logos speculation.” Based on the biblical warrant for the role of the divine Logos in creation, I conclude, over against Dooyeweerd, that the concept of substance can be redeemed and that a minimal form of dualism is necessary in order to account for the Bible’s teaching about humans. Adopting a realist reading of the multidimensionality of human existence uncovered by Dooyeweerd’s modal aspects analysis, we arrive at a truly non-reductionist view of human nature, which the two forms of emergence examined here aimed at but could not provide.

Keywords

Emergence Logos Non-reductive physicalism Substance Dualism Mādhyamaka Buddhism Herman Dooyeweerd Jaegwon Kim Philip Clayton Francisco Varela 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Augustine of Hippo. 1950. Œuvres de Saint Augustin. Vol. 12, Les révisions, Translated from Latin by Gustave Bardy. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  2. Beauregard, Mario, and Denyse O’Leary. 2007. The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Case for the Existence of the Soul. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Berkhof, Louis. 1953. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  4. Berkouwer, G.C. 1954. The Person of Christ. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, Steve, and John H. Kok, eds. 2013. On Kuyper: A Collection of Readings on the Life, Work and Legacy of Abraham Kuyper. Sioux Center: Dordt College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bitbol, Michel. 2004. Origine et création. In Les origines de la création: Journée de la philosophie à l’UNESCO 2002, ed. Guy Samama, 5−30. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001375/137529fo.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2017.
  7. ———. 2007. Ontology, Matter and Emergence. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 6: 293−307. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4006/. Accessed 11 May 2017.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2010. De l’intérieur du monde: Pour une philosophie et une science des relations. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  9. Blanke, Olaf, and Sebastian Dieguez. 2009. Leaving Body and Life Behind: Out-of-Body and Near-Death Experience. In The Neurology of Consciousness, ed. S. Laureys and G. Tononi, 303–325. Maryland Heights: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blocher, Henri. 1974. La venue du Fils-Logos: Remarques sur le prologue de Jean. Ichthus 47−48: 2–7.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1990. Divine Immutability. In The Power and Weakness of God: Impassibility and Orthodoxy; Papers Presented at the Third Edinburgh Conference in Christian Dogmatics, 1989, ed. Nigel M. de S. Cameron, 1−22. Edinburgh: Rutherford House.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2011. John 1: Preexistent Logos and God the Son. In Theological Commentary: Evangelical Perspectives, ed. Michael Allen, 115−128. London: T & Clark.Google Scholar
  13. Buchhold, Jacques. 2009. L’“âme” et la continuité de la personne dans la mort. Enquête sur le Nouveau Testament dans son contexte. In L’âme et le cerveau: L’enjeu des neurosciences, ed. Lydia Jaeger, 95–130. Vaux-sur-Seine/Charols: Édifac/Excelsis.Google Scholar
  14. Clayton, Philip. 2004. Mind and Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clouser, Roy A. 1996. A sketch of Dooyeweerd’s philosophy of science. In Facets of faith and science, ed. Jitse M. van der Meer, vol. 2. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  16. Coletto, Renato. 2015. Lydia Jaeger and Herman Dooyeweerd: Dialogues on the Foundations of Christian Scholarship. Koers—Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 80 (2): art. no. 2223.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, John W. 2000. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  18. Dooyeweerd, Herman. 1939. Kuyper’s [sic] Wetenschapsleer. Philosophia Reformata 4: 193−232. English translation in Bishop and Kok 2013, chap. 14.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1942. The Theory of Man in the Philosophy of the Law Idea (Wijsbegeerte der Wetsidee): 32 Propositions on Anthropology, Translated by J. Glenn Friesen. (Original text: De leer van den mensch in de wijsbegeerte der wetsidee, Correspondentie-Bladen 7, Dec 1942.) https://jgfriesen.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/32propositions.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  20. ———. 1948. Transcendental Problems of Philosophical Thought. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1953. A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed. (All volumes of A New Critique can be downloaded at http://www.reformationalpublishingproject.com/rpp/paideia_books.asp. Accessed 25 Nov 2011).Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1955. A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1957. A New Critique of Theoretical Thought. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1975. In the Twilight of Western Thought: Studies in the Pretended Autonomy of Philosophical Thought. Nutley: Craig Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1997. Reformation and Scholasticism in Philosophy. Vol. 2. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press. http://www2.redeemer.ca/dooyeweerd/seriesa-excerptsA6.php. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.
  26. El-Hani, Charbel Nino, and Antonio Marcos Pereira. 2000. Higher-Level Descriptions: Why should We Preserve Them? In Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter, ed. Peter Bogh Andersen, Claus Emmeche, Niels Ole Finnemann, and Peder Voetmann Christiansen, 118–142. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Foster, Michael B. 1936. Christian Theology and Modern Science of Nature (2). Mind 45: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garfield, Jay L. 1994. Dependent Arising and the Emptiness of Emptiness: Why Did Nagarjuana [sic] Start with Causation? Philosophy East & West 44: 219–250. http://www.thezensite.com/ZenEssays/Nagarjuna/Dependent_Arising.htm. Accessed 27 Apr 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nâgârjuna’s Mûlamadhyamakakârikâ, translation and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 1998. The Idea of Creation and the Theory of Autopoietic Processes. Zygon 33: 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gunton, Colin. 1997. The Trinity, Natural Theology, and a Theology of Nature. In The Trinity in a Pluralistic Age: Theological Essays on Culture and Religion, ed. Kevin J. Vanhoozer, 88–103. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  32. Jaeger, Lydia. 2004. Cosmic Order and Divine Word. Churchman 118: 47−51. Also published in Spiritual Information: 100 Perspectives, 2005, ed. Charles L. Harper Jr., 151−154. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2007. Lois de la nature et raisons du cœur: Les convictions religieuses dans le débat épistémologique contemporain. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2012a. Against Physicalism-plus-God: How Creation Accounts for Divine Action in the World. Faith and Philosophy 29: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2012b. Herman Dooyeweerd, la “spéculation sur le logos” et la vérité. In L’amour de la sagesse: Hommage à Henri Blocher, ed. Alain Nisus, 299–310. Vaux-sur-Seine/Charols: Édifac/Excelsis.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2012c. What the Heavens Declare: Science in the Light of Creation. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  37. Kim, Jaegwon. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 1999. Making Sense of Emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2006. Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues. Synthese 151: 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Milton, John R. 1981. The origin and development of the concept of the “Laws of Nature.” Archives européennes de sociologie 22: 173–195.Google Scholar
  41. Murphy, Nancey. 1998. Nonreductive Physicalism: Philosophical Issues. In Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature, ed. Warren S. Brown, Nancey Murphy, and H. Newton Malony, 127–148. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2000. Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nicole, Emile. 2009. L’Ancien Testament enseigne-t-il la dualité du corps et de l’âme. In L’âme et le cerveau: L’enjeu des neurosciences, ed. Lydia Jaeger, 69–88. Vaux-sur-Seine/Charols: Édifac/Excelsis.Google Scholar
  44. O’Connor, Timothy, and Hong Yu Wong. 2009. Emergent Properties. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2015 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/. Accessed 11 May 2017.
  45. Pascal, Blaise. (1670) 1976. Pensées, ed. L. Brunschvicg. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, Evan. 2004. Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 3: 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Van Fraassen, Bas. 1996. Science, Materialism, and False Consciousness. In Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. Jonathan L. Kvanvig, 149–181. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2004. Transcendence of the Ego (The Non-Existent Knight). Ratio 17: 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Woudenberg, René. 2005. Two Very Different Analyses of Knowledge. In Ways of Knowing in Concert, ed. John H. Kok, 101–122. Sioux Center: Dordt College Press.Google Scholar
  51. Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Weber, Andreas, and Francisco Varela. 2002. Life After Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2: 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974. On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Wolfson, Harry Austryn. 1956. The Philosophy of the Church Fathers. Vol. 1, Faith, Trinity, Incarnation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Young, William. 1969. Herman Dooyeweerd. In Creative Minds in Contemporary Theology: A Guidebook to the Principal Teachings of Karl Barth, G.C. Berkouwer, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Emil Brunner, Rudolf Bultmann, Oscar Cullmann, James Denney, C.H. Dodd, Herman Dooyeweerd, P.T. Forsyth, Charles Gore, Reinhold Niebuhr, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and Paul Tillich, ed. Philip E. Hughes, 2nd ed., 270−301. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Biblique de Nogent-sur-MarneNogent-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations