Advertisement

Designing an Intervention for Creating Awareness in Motorists About Vehicle Emission Consequences on Human Health

  • Antti JylhäEmail author
  • Ismael Harraou
  • Arnold Jan Quanjer
  • Jos van Leeuwen
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Adaptive Environments book series (SPSADENV)

Abstract

Exhaust emissions from motorized vehicles are not only harmful to the environment but also to human health. However, motorists are not necessarily aware of the adverse health effects resulting from their emissions. In this work, we use the health aspect as a primary motivation factor in the design of an intervention targeted at reducing exhaust emissions. Based on research into the problem domain and the target group, we propose a design for a behavior-change intervention consisting of an infrastructure of large public displays and a mobile application. In a design prototype, we incorporate two approaches, shaming and empowerment, designed to engage motorists with the intervention. An experimental evaluation of the prototype suggests that shaming can have a lot of potential in providing motivation for change, while empowerment is also needed inside the application for helping the drivers reduce their emissions by means of more efficient traveling. Based on the findings, we discuss the role of personal data in the intervention and outline possibilities for realizing the design as part of the built environment.

Keywords

Sustainable mobility Persuasive technologies Public displays Motorists Privacy 

References

  1. Anagnostopoulou E, Bothos E, Magoutas B et al (2016) Persuasive technologies for sustainable urban mobility. Persuasive 2016 Workshop. Where are we bound for? Persuasion in Transport Applications. Salzburg, Austria, 5 Apr 2016Google Scholar
  2. Anable J (2005) ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transp Policy 12:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blom J, Hänninen R (2012) Air pollution in everyday life: toward design of persuasive urban air quality services. In: Proceedings of the international conference on persuasive technology, Linköping, Sweden, 6–8 Jun 2012Google Scholar
  4. Brynjarsdóttir H, Håkansson M, Pierce J et al (2012) Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), Austin, TX, 5–10 May 2012Google Scholar
  5. Cialdini RB (1987) Influence, vol 3. A. Michel, Port HarcourtGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickinson A, Lochrie M, Egglestone P (2015) UKKO: enriching persuasive location based games with environmental sensor data. In: Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, London, UK, 5–7 Oct 2015Google Scholar
  7. DiSalvo C, Lukens J, Lodato T et al (2014) Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Toronto, Canada, 26 Apr–1 May 2014Google Scholar
  8. Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogg BJ (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, Claremont, CA, 26–29 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  10. Froehlich J, Dillahunt T, Klasnja P et al (2009) UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI), Boston, MA, 04–09 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  11. Froehlich J, Findlater L, Landay J (2010) The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), Atlanta, GA, 10–15 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  12. Gabrielli S, Forbes P, Jylhä A et al (2014) Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility. Comput Hum Behav 41:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geng J, Long R, Chen H, Li W (2017) Exploring the motivation-behavior gap in urban residents’ green travel behavior: a theoretical and empirical study. Resour Conserv Recycl 125:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greengard S (2015) The internet of things. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang EM, Koster A, Borchers J (2008) Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on pervasive computing, Sydney, Australia, 19–22 May 2008Google Scholar
  16. Hemminki S, Nurmi P, Tarkoma S et al (2013) Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems, Rome, Italy, 11–15 Nov 2013Google Scholar
  17. Johansson C, Lövenheim B, Schantz P et al (2017) Impacts on air pollution and health by changing commuting from car to bicycle. Sci Total Environ 584:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jylhä A, Nurmi P, Sirén M et al (2013) Matkahupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, Zürich, Switzerland, 8–12 Sep 2013Google Scholar
  19. Kim T, DiSalvo C (2010) Speculative visualization: a new rhetoric for communicating public concerns. In: Proceedings of the design research society (DRS) international conference design & complexity, Montreal, Canada, 7–9 Jul 2010Google Scholar
  20. Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klecha L, Gianni F (2017) Designing for sustainable urban mobility behaviour: a systematic review of the literature. In: Proceedings of the conference on smart learning ecosystems and regional development, Aveiro, Portugal, 22–23 Jun 2017Google Scholar
  22. Memarovic N (2016) Community Is the message: viewing networked public displays through McLuhan’s media theory. In: Dalton N et al (eds) Architecture and interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 165–182Google Scholar
  23. Milieudefensie (2017) Eindrapportage meetcmpagne 2015. https://milieudefensie.nl/publicaties/rapporten/meetrapport-2015. Accessed 27 Apr 2017
  24. Mun M, Reddy S, Shilton K et al (2009) PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (MobiSys), Kraków, Poland, 22–25 Jun 2009Google Scholar
  25. Schoffelen J, Claes S, Huybrechts L et al (2015) Visualising things. Perspectives on how to make things public through visualisation. CoDesign 11(3–4):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepard M (2011) Sentient city: ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Schrammel J, Busch M, Tscheligi M (2013) Peacox—persuasive advisor for CO2-reducing cross-modal trip planning. In: First international conference on behavior change support systems, Sydney, Australia, 3–5 Apr 2013Google Scholar
  28. Scott MG, Lawson R (2017) The road code: encouraging more efficient driving practices in New Zealand. Energy Effic.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9538-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weichenthal S, Farrel W, Goldberg M et al (2014) Characterizing the impact of traffic and the built environment on near-road ultrafine particle and black carbon concentrations. Environ Res 132:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zapico JL, Turpeinen M, Brandt N (2009) Climate persuasive services: changing behavior towards low-carbon lifestyles. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, Claremont, CA, 26–29 Apr 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Jylhä
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ismael Harraou
    • 1
  • Arnold Jan Quanjer
    • 1
  • Jos van Leeuwen
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hague University of Applied SciencesThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations