Advertisement

WABI: Facilitating Synchrony Between Inhabitants of Adaptive Architecture

  • Nils JägerEmail author
  • Holger Schnädelbach
  • Jonathan Hale
  • David Kirk
  • Kevin Glover
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Adaptive Environments book series (SPSADENV)

Abstract

We spend most of our lives in buildings where we interact with people that occupy the same space. A common and intuitive form of interaction with others is to synchronise our own behaviour with theirs, and such interpersonal synchrony can have various benefits for our wellbeing. We present research that investigates how a new prototype of digitally-driven adaptive architecture called WABI facilitates behavioural synchrony between its inhabitants. We designed three interaction modes that each feature a unique mapping and processing of physiological data emanating from inhabitants. Qualitative feedback from a first exploratory study indicates that the different interaction modes affect how inhabitants interact and synchronise their behaviours. We discuss how adaptive architecture might contribute to wellbeing, therapy, and sports by facilitating synchrony.

Keywords

Adaptive architecture Synchrony Embodied interaction Data mapping Empirical study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants of the study. This work was supported by the EPSRC under Grant EP/P505658 and Grant EP/M000877/1; the University of Nottingham via the Nottingham Research Fellowship “The Built Environment as the Interface to Personal Data” and Loughborough University.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Asendorpf JB, Warkentin V, Baudonnière P-M (1996) Self-awareness and other-awareness. II: Mirror self-recognition, social contingency awareness, and synchronic imitation. Dev Psychol 32(2): 313–321.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.313 (American Psychological Association)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell PA, Greene TC, Fisher J, Baum A (1996) Architecture, design, and engineering for human behavior. In: Environmental Psychology, 4th edn. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX, pp 410–443Google Scholar
  3. Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, Nagaraja HN et al (1997) Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. 34(6):623–648Google Scholar
  4. Bier H, Knight T (2010) Digitally-driven architecture. Footprint 6 (Spring 2010). Delft School of Design, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  5. Bullivant L (2005a) Sky Ear, Usman Haque. Architectural Des 75(1):8–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.6 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullivant L (2005b) 4dspace: interactive architecture (Architectural design). Architectural Des 75(1):128. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ad.v75:1/issuetoc (John Wiley & Sons, London)
  7. Bullivant L (2005c) D-Tower, NOX. In: Doetinchem, The Netherlands, 1998–2004. Academy Press, pp 1–4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ad.16/pdf
  8. Bullivant L (2006) Responsive environments. Victoria & Albert Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chartrand TL, van Baaren R (2009) Human mimicry. Adv Exp Soc Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00405-xGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen EEA, Ejsmond-Frey R, Knight N, Dunbar RIM (2010) Rowers’ high: behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biol Let 6(1):106–108.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–59.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 (American Psychological Association)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crabtree A, Tolmie P, Rouncefield M (2013) “How Many Bloody Examples Do You Want?” Fieldwork and Generalisation. In: Bertelsen O, Ciolfi L, Grasso M, Papadopoulos G (eds) ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp 21–25. September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalton NS, Schnädelbach H, Wiberg M, Varoudis T (2016) Architecture and interaction. In: Dalton NS, Schnädelbach H, Wiberg M, Varoudis T (eds). Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3Google Scholar
  14. Dosil J (2008) The sport psychologist’s handbook: a guide for sport-specific performance enhancement (pp 1–704). John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713174Google Scholar
  15. Eng K, Babler A, Bernardet U, Blanchard M, Costa M, Delbruck T, Douglas RJ et al (2003) Ada—intelligent space: an artificial creature for the SwissExpo.02. In: vol 3, IEEE, Taipei, pp 4154–4159.  https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2003.1242236
  16. Feldman R (2007) Parent–infant synchrony. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16(6):340–345.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00532.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman R, Eidelman AI (2004) Parent–infant synchrony and the social–emotional development of triplets. 40(6):1133–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman R, Greenbaum CW, Yirmiya N (1999) Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. 35(1):223–231.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fouriezos G, Capstick G, Monette F, Bellemare C, Parkinson M, Dumoulin A (2007) Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli 61(4):277–292.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox M, Kemp M (2009) Interactive architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Glynn R (2005) Reciprocal space. Interactivearchitecture.org. http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/reciprocal-space-ruairi-glynn.html
  22. Green KE (2016) Architectural robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerra LC, Todoroff T, Sebti Y (n.d.) Lungs [The Breather]. Nadine, vol 7. Brussels, Belgium. http://thebreather.org/index.php?page=about_en
  24. Hirsch JA, Bishop B (1981) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate. Am J Physiol 241(4):H620–H629Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs M, Findley J (2015) Breathe. Sonicribbon.com. http://www.sonicribbon.com/sonicribbon/breathe/. Accessed 9 Feb
  26. Jäger N, Schnädelbach H, Hale J, Kirk D, Glover K (2017) Reciprocal control in adaptive environments. In: Barbosa S (ed) Interacting with computers, vol 29, issue 4. pp 512–29.  https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww037
  27. Khan O (2010) Open columns: a carbon dioxide (CO2) responsive architecture. In: The 28th of the international conference extended abstracts. ACM, New York, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754232
  28. Kimura M, Daibo I (2006) Interactional synchrony in conversations about emotional episodes: a measurement by ‘the between-participants pseudosynchrony experimental paradigm. J Nonverbal Behav 30(3):115–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-006-0011-5 (Springer, US)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolarevic B, Parlac V (2015) Building dynamics. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koren L (2008) Wabi-Sabi for artists, designers, poets & philosophers. Imperfect PublishingGoogle Scholar
  31. Marmot A (2005) Architectural determinism. Does design change behaviour? Br J Gen Pract 52(476):1–16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314260/pdf/12030684.pdf
  32. Miles LK, Nind LK, Macrae CN (2009) The rhythm of rapport: interpersonal synchrony and social perception. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(3):585–589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles LK, Nind LK, Henderson Z, Macrae CN (2010) Moving memories: behavioral synchrony and memory for self and others. J Exp Soc Psychol 46(2):457–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milojicic D, Nikolich P, Leiba B (2015) Standards for tomorrow: the internet of things (Ubiquity symposium). Ubiquity 2015:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2822533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MindMedia (2015) Mindmedia.com. MindMedia. http://www.mindmedia.nl/CMS/index.php
  36. Moran S, Jäger N, Schnädelbach H, Glover K (2016) ExoPranayama: a biofeedback-driven actuated environment for supporting yoga breathing practices. In: Personal and ubiquitous computing. April, Springer, London, pp 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0910-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moraveji N, Olson B, Nguyen T, Saadat M, Khalighi Y, Pea R, Heer J (2011) Peripheral paced respiration: influencing user physiology during information work. In: 24th annual ACM symposium. ACM, New York, USA, pp 423–428. http://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047250
  38. Muench F (2008) The portable StressEraser heart rate variability biofeedback device: background and research. Biofeedback 36(1):35–39Google Scholar
  39. Najjar K, Najjar R (2016) Bug. Najjar-Najjar.com. Beirut. http://najjar-najjar.com/projects/?cat=5&l=0. Accessed 1 April
  40. Novelda (2017) X4M200 respiration sensor—XeThruGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramseyer F, Tschacher W (2011) Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. J Consult Clin Psychol 79(3):284–124.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023419 (American Psychological Association)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez-Burks J, Bartel CA, Blount S (2009) Performance in intercultural interactions at work: cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring. 94(1):216–223.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaffert N, Mattes K (2015) Interactive sonification in rowing: an application of acoustic feedback for on-water training. IEEE MultiMedia, 1–1. http://doi.org/10.1109/mmul.2015.25
  44. Schnädelbach H (2011) Physiological data in adaptive architecture, London. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:aNYmS76pbmEJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0,5
  45. Schnädelbach H, Irune AA, Kirk D, Glover K, Brundell P (2012) ExoBuilding: physiologically driven adaptive architecture. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interact 19(4):1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2395131.2395132 (ACM)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnädelbach H, Glover K, Irune AA (2010) ExoBuilding: breathing life into architecture. Reykjavik, pp 442–451.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868965
  47. Schnädelbach H, Jäger N, Nabil S, Dalton N, Kirk D, Churchill E (2017) People, personal data and the built environment. In: Presented at the 2017 ACM conference on designing interactive systems—DIS ’17. http://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3064864
  48. Smith P, Burns DJ (1996) Atmospherics and retail environments: the case of the ‘power aisle’. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 24(1):7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09590559610107076 (MCB UP Ltd)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spangenberg ER, Grohmann B, Sprott DE (2005) It’s beginning to smell (and sound) a lot like christmas: the interactive effects of ambient scent and music in a retail setting. J Bus Res 58(11):1583–1589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanizaki J (2001) In praise of shadows. Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  51. Turley LW, Milliman RE (2000) Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior. J Bus Res 49(2):193–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00010-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Leeuwen P, Geue D, Lange S (2003) Is there evidence of fetal-maternal heart rate synchronization? BMC Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-3-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vidyarthi J, Riecke BE, Gromala D (2012) Sonic cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. ACM, New York, USA, pp 408–417.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318017
  54. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st Century 1(1):19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2002.993141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson C, Hargreaves T, Hauxwell-Baldwin R (2015) Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(2):463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yalch RF, Spangenberg ER (2000) The effects of music in a retail setting on real and perceived shopping times. J Bus Res 49(2):139–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00003-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yasuma F, Hayano J (2004) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Chest J.  https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.2.683CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Jäger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Holger Schnädelbach
    • 2
  • Jonathan Hale
    • 3
  • David Kirk
    • 4
  • Kevin Glover
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Architecture, Building and Civil EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLeicesterUK
  2. 2.Mixed Reality Laboratory, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.Department of Architecture and Built Environment, School of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Department of Computer and Information ScienceNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations