Advertisement

Enriching Media Collections for Event-Based Exploration

  • Victor de BoerEmail author
  • Liliana Melgar
  • Oana Inel
  • Carlos Martinez Ortiz
  • Lora Aroyo
  • Johan Oomen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 755)

Abstract

Scholars currently have access to large heterogeneous media collections on the Web, which they use as sources for their research. Exploration of such collections is an important part in their research, where scholars make sense of these heterogeneous datasets. Knowledge graphs which relate media objects, people and places with historical events can provide a valuable structure for more meaningful and serendipitous browsing. Based on extensive requirements analysis done with historians and media scholars, we present a methodology to publish, represent, enrich, and link heritage collections so that they can be explored by domain expert users. We present four methods to derive events from media object descriptions. We also present a case study where four datasets with mixed media types are made accessible to scholars and describe the building blocks for event-based proto-narratives in the knowledge graph.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by CLARIAH (http://clariah.nl/) and by the Netherlands eScience Center (http://esciencecenter.nl/) DIVE+ project. We furthermore thank Victor Kramer, Jaap Blom and Werner Helmich.

References

  1. 1.
    van den Akker, C., van Nuland, A., van der Meij, L., van Erp, M., Legne, S., Aroyo, L., Schreiber, G.: From information delivery to interpretation support: evaluating cultural heritage access on the web. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, WebSci 2013, pp. 431–440. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akker, C.v.d., Legêne, S., Erp, M.v., Aroyo, L., Segers, R., Meij, L.v.D., Ossenbruggen Van, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., Oomen, J., et al.: Digital hermeneutics: agora and the online understanding of cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, p. 10. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aroyo, L., Welty, C.: The three sides of CrowdTruth. J. Hum. Comput. 1, 31–34 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baca, M.: Practical issues in applying metadata schemas and controlled vocabularies to cultural heritage information. Cat. Classif. Q. 36(3–4), 47–55 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. In: Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts, pp. 205–227 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van den Bosch, A., Busser, B., Canisius, S., Daelemans, W.: An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for dutch. LOT Occas. 7, 191–206 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bron, M., van Gorp, J., de Rijke, M.: Media studies research in the data-driven age: How research questions evolve. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(7), 1535–1554 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coburn, E., Light, R., McKenna, G., Stein, R., Vitzthum, A.: LIDO-lightweight information describing objects version 1.0. ICOM International Committee of Museums (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Boer, V., Oomen, J., Inel, O., Aroyo, L., van Staveren, E., Helmich, W., de Beurs, D.: DIVE into the event-based browsing of linked historical media. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents WWW 35, 152–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Boer, V., Priem, M., Hildebrand, M., Verplancke, N., de Vries, A., Oomen, J.: Exploring Audiovisual Archives Through Aligned Thesauri, pp. 211–222 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Boer, V., Wielemaker, J., van Gent, J., Oosterbroek, M., Hildebrand, M., Isaac, A., van Ossenbruggen, J., Schreiber, G.: Amsterdam museum linked open data. Semant. Web 4(3), 237–243 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Boer, V., Wielemaker, J., Gent, J., Hildebrand, M., Isaac, A., Ossenbruggen, J., Schreiber, G.: Supporting linked data production for cultural heritage institutes: the amsterdam museum case study. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 733–747. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dijkshoorn, C., Leyssen, M.H., Nottamkandath, A., Oosterman, J., Traub, M.C., Aroyo, L., Bozzon, A., Fokkink, W., Houben, G.J., Hovelmann, H., et al.: Personalized nichesourcing: acquisition of qualitative annotations from niche communities. In: UMAP Workshops (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag. 24(3), 75 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., van de Sompel, H.: The europeana data model (edm). In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, pp. 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gangemi, A.: A comparison of knowledge extraction tools for the semantic web. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 351–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grover, C., Givon, S., Tobin, R., Ball, J.: Named entity recognition for digitised historical texts. In: LREC (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Hage, W.R., Malais, V., Segers, R., Hollink, L., Schreiber, G.: Design and use of the simple event model (SEM). Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agent World Wide Web 9(2), 128–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hagedoorn, B., Sauer, S.: Getting the Bigger Picture: Exploratory Search and Narrative Creation for Media Research into Disruptive Events. Utrecht (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Hooland, S., De Wilde, M., Verborgh, R., Steiner, T., van de Walle, R.: Exploring entity recognition and disambiguation for cultural heritage collections. Digit. Sch. Humanit. 30(2), 262–279 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Inel, O., Aroyo, L.: Harnessing diversity in crowds and machines for better NER performance. In: Blomqvist, E., Maynard, D., Gangemi, A., Hoekstra, R., Hitzler, P., Hartig, O. (eds.) ESWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10249, pp. 289–304. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, J.D., Ohta, T., Pyysalo, S., Kano, Y., Tsujii, J.: Overview of bionlp’09 shared task on event extraction. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Shared Task, pp. 1–9. ACL (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, K., Artzi, Y., Choi, Y., Zettlemoyer, L.: Event detection and factuality assessment with non-expert supervision. In: EMNLP, pp. 1643–1648 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Melgar Estrada, L., Koolen, M., Huurdeman, H., Blom, J.: A process model of time-based media annotation in a scholarly context. In: ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (CHIIR), Oslo (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C., Pirmann, C.M.: Scholarly information practices in the online environment: themes from the literature and implications for library service development. Technical report, OCLC Research, Dublin, Ohio (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richards, J.D., Tudhope, D., Vlachidis, A.: Text mining in archaeology: extracting information from archaeological reports. In: Barcelo, J., Bogdanovic, I. (eds.) Mathematics and Archaeology, p. 240. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sauer, S., de Rijke, M.: Seeking serendipity: a living lab approach to understanding creative retrieval in broadcast media production. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2016, pp. 989–992. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schreiber, G., Amin, A., Aroyo, L., van Assem, M., de Boer, V., Hardman, L., Hildebrand, M., Omelayenko, B., van Osenbruggen, J., Tordai, A., et al.: Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections: the multimedian e-culture demonstrator. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 6(4), 243–249 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaw, R., Troncy, R., Hardman, L.: LODE: linking open descriptions of events. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Yu, Y., Ding, Y. (eds.) ASWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5926, pp. 153–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10871-6_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Veen, T., Lonij, J., Faber, W.J.: Linking named entities in dutch historical newspapers. In: Garoufallou, E., Subirats Coll, I., Stellato, A., Greenberg, J. (eds.) MTSR 2016. CCIS, vol. 672, pp. 205–210. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49157-8_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor de Boer
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Liliana Melgar
    • 2
    • 4
  • Oana Inel
    • 1
  • Carlos Martinez Ortiz
    • 3
  • Lora Aroyo
    • 1
  • Johan Oomen
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.eScience CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Netherlands Institute for Sound and VisionHilversumThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations