Production Performance Analysis of Shale Gas Reservoirs

  • Jebraeel Gholinezhad
  • John Senam Fianu
  • Mohamed Galal Hassan
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering book series (BRIEFSPGE)

Abstract

Prediction of production performance in shale gas reservoirs can be achieved through a number of techniques designed to produce information about the estimated ultimate recovery and also about the reservoir parameters such as permeability, skin and fracture properties. These methods sometimes involve obtaining well production data and making future predictions from them. This chapter looks at some of the analytical and semi-analytical models for production performance calculations associated with shale gas reservoirs. The techniques discussed in this chapter include decline curve analysis, pressure transient analysis and rate transient analysis.

References

  1. Agarwal RG, Al-Hussainy R, Ramey HJ (1970) An investigation of wellbore storage and skin effect in unsteady liquid flow: I. Analytical treatment. Soc Pet Eng J 10:279–290.  https://doi.org/10.2118/2466-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal RG, Gardner DC, Kleinsteiber SW, Fussell DD (1998) Analysing well production data using combined type curve and decline curve analysis concepts. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/49222-MS
  3. Al-Kobaisi M, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2006) A hybrid numerical/analytical model of a finite-conductivity vertical fracture intercepted by a horizontal well. SPE Reserv Eval Eng. 9:345.  https://doi.org/10.2118/92040-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arps JJ (1945) Analysis of decline curves. Trans AIME.  https://doi.org/10.2118/945228-G
  5. Bahrami N, Pena D, Lusted I (2016) Well test, rate transient analysis and reservoir simulation for characterizing multi-fractured unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 6:675–689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-015-0219-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brohi I, Pooladi-Darvish M, Aguilera R (2011) Modeling fractured horizontal wells as dual porosity composite reservoirs—application to tight gas, shale gas and tight oil cases. SPE West North Am Reg Meet.  https://doi.org/10.2118/144057-MS
  7. Carter RD (1981) Characteristic behavior of finite radial and linear gas flow systems—constant terminal pressure case. SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reserv Symp.  https://doi.org/10.2118/9887-MS
  8. Carter R (1985) Type curves for finite radial and linear gas-flow systems: constant-terminal-pressure case. Soc Pet Eng J 25:719–728.  https://doi.org/10.2118/12917-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng Y (2011) Pressure transient characteristics of hydraulically fractured horizontal shale gas wells. SPE East Reg Meet, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.2118/149311-MS
  10. Cinco LH, Samaniego F (1981) Transient pressure analysis for fractured wells. J Pet Technol 33:1749–1766.  https://doi.org/10.2118/7490-PA
  11. Cinco LH, Samaniego V, Dominguez A (1978) Transient pressure behavior for a well with a finite-conductivity vertical fracture. SPE J 18:253–264.  https://doi.org/10.2118/6014-PA
  12. Clarkson C (2011) Integration of rate-transient and microseismic analysis for unconventional gas reservoirs: where reservoir engineering meets geophysics. CSEG Rec 36:44–61Google Scholar
  13. Clarkson CR, Beierle JJ (2011) Integration of microseismic and other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis: a tight gas study. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 3:382–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2011.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duong A (2011) Rate-decline analysis for fracture-dominated shale reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 14:19–21.  https://doi.org/10.2118/137748-PA Google Scholar
  15. Ehlig-Economides CA, Ramey HJ (1981) Transient rate decline analysis for wells produced at constant pressure. Soc Pet Eng J 21:98–104.  https://doi.org/10.2118/8387-pa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehlig-Economides CA, Barron HM, Okunola D (2009) Unified PTA and PDA approach enhances well and reservoir characterization. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/123042-MS
  17. Fetkovich MJ (1980) Decline curve analysis using type curves. J Pet Technol 32:1065–1077.  https://doi.org/10.2118/4629-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fetkovich MJ, Vienot ME, Bradley MD, Kiesow UG (1987) Decline curve analysis using type curves: case histories. SPE Form Eval 2:637–656.  https://doi.org/10.2118/13169-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraim ML, Wattenbarger RA (1987) Gas reservoir decline-curve analysis using type curves with real gas pseudopressure and normalized time. SPE Form Eval 2:671–682.  https://doi.org/10.2118/14238-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman CM, Moridis G, Ilk D, Blasingame TA (2009) A numerical study of performance for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems. SPE Annu Tech Conf Exhib.  https://doi.org/10.2118/124961-MS
  21. Gatens MJ, Lee WJ, Lane HS, Watson AT, Stanley DK (1989) Analysis of eastern devonian gas shales production data. J Pet Technol 41:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo J, Zhang L, Wang H (2014) Pressure transient characteristics of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple mechanismsGoogle Scholar
  23. Ilk D, Perego aD, Rushing Ja, Blasingame Ta (2008) Exponential vs. hyperbolic decline in tight gas sands—understanding the origin and implications for reserve estimates using Arps’ decline curves. Spe-116731 116731.  https://doi.org/10.2118/116731-MS
  24. Kanfar M, Wattenbarger R (2012) Comparison of empirical decline curve methods for shale wells. SPE Can Unconv Resour Conf, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2118/162648-MS
  25. Kim TH, Park P, Lee KS (2014) Development and application of type curves for pressure transient analysis of multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs. Offshore Technology Conference. doi: 10.4043/24881-MS
  26. Kruysdijk V, Dullaert GM (1989) A boundary element solution to the transient pressure response of multiply fractured horizontal wells. In: ECMOR I-1st European conference on the mathematics of oil recoveryGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsen L, Hegre TM (1991) Pressure-transient behavior of horizontal wells with finite-conductivity vertical fractures. Methods.  https://doi.org/10.2118/22076-ms Google Scholar
  28. Larsen L, Hegre T (1994) Pressure transient analysis of multifractured horizontal wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/28389-MS
  29. Lewis AM, Hughes RG (2008) Production data analysis of shale gas reservoir. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/116688-MS
  30. Malallah A, Nashawi I, Algharaib M (2007) Constant-pressure analysis of oil wells intercepted by infinite-conductivity\nHydraulic fracture using rate and rate-derivative functions. Proc SPE Middle East Oil Gas Show Conf.  https://doi.org/10.2523/105046-MS
  31. Medeiros F, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2006) A semianalytical, pressure-transient model for horizontal and multilateral wells in composite, layered, and compartmentalized reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/102834-MS
  32. Medeiros F, Kurtoglu B, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2007) Pressure-transient performances of hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in locally and globally naturally fractured formations. Int Pet Technol Conf.  https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-11781-MS
  33. Medeiros F, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2008) Productivity and drainage area of fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 11:16–18.  https://doi.org/10.2118/108110-PA Google Scholar
  34. Ozkan E, Ohaeri U, Raghavan R (1987) Unsteady flow to a well produced at a constant pressure in a fractured reservoir. SPE Form Eval, 187–200. SPE–9902–PA.  https://doi.org/10.2118/9902-PA
  35. Palacio JC, Blasingame TA (1993) Decline curve analysis using type curves: analysis of gas well production data. In: 1993 SPE Jt Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium.  https://doi.org/10.2118/25909-MS
  36. Raghavan R, Chen C-C, Argawal B (1997) An analysis of horizontal wells intercepted by multiple fractures. SPE J 2:235–245.  https://doi.org/10.2118/27652-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodriguez F, Horne RN, Cinco LH (1984a) Partially penetrating fractures: pressure transient analysis of an infinite conductivity fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/12743-MS
  38. Rodriguez F, Horne RN, Cinco LH (1984b) Partially penetrating vertical fractures: pressure transient behavior of a finite-conductivity fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/13057-MS
  39. Schulte WM (1986) Production from a fractured well with well inflow limited to part of the fractured height. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/12882-PA
  40. Seshadri J, Mattar L (2010) Comparison of power law and modified hyperbolic decline methods. Can Unconv Resour Int Pet Conf, 19–21.  https://doi.org/10.2118/137320-MS
  41. Uraiet aa, Raghavan R (1980) Unsteady flow to a well producing at a constant pressure. J Pet Technol 32:1803–1812.  https://doi.org/10.2118/8768-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valko P (2009) Assigning value to stimulation in the Barnett Shale: a simultaneous analysis of 7000 plus production histories and well completion records. Proceedings of SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, pp 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.2118/119369-MS
  43. Vera F, Ehlig-Economides C (2014) Describing shale well performance using transient well analysis. The Way Ahead 10(02):24–28Google Scholar
  44. Wang F, Zhang S, Liu B (2013) Pressure transient analysis of multi-stage hydraulically fractured horizontal wells. J Pet Sci Res 2:162.  https://doi.org/10.14355/jpsr.2013.0204.03 Google Scholar
  45. Wei Y, Economides MJ (2005) Transverse hydraulic fractures from a horizontal well. SPE Annu Tech Conf Exhib, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2118/94671-MS

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jebraeel Gholinezhad
    • 1
  • John Senam Fianu
    • 1
  • Mohamed Galal Hassan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations