“To Wander Off in Shame”: Deconstructing the Shaming and Shameful Arrest Policies of Urban Police Departments in Their Treatment of Persons with Mental Disabilities

  • Michael L. Perlin
  • Alison J. Lynch
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we will focus on the decision-making processes made “on the street” by police officers who choose to apprehend and arrest certain cohorts of persons with mental disabilities, rather than seeking other, treatment-oriented alternatives in dealing with them. There is robust valid and reliable literature demonstrating that certain methods of training programs designed for police officers—the “Memphis Model” of crisis intervention training (CIT) is the most well known—have resulted in dramatic reductions of arrests for “nuisance crimes” and have avoided contributing to the overincarceration of this population. Yet, these approaches are far from widespread, so far appearing in only a handful of cities with any consistency, and, as a result, populations of persons with mental disabilities in urban jails like Riker’s Island continue to skyrocket. The means by which these arrests are effectuated reveal a consistent strategic deployment of humiliation as a means of controlling this stigmatized cohort of the population. The shaming nature of these encounters and arrests often leave already-vulnerable individuals feeling unheard and potentially traumatized. We will examine these issues through the filter of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ), a new modality of solving a full range of seemingly intractable social problems. TJ teaches us that voice, validation, and voluntariness—and embracing an “ethic of care”—are central to any efforts to remediate the sort of issues we discuss here.

Keywords

Humiliation Shame Dignity Therapeutic jurisprudence Police Nuisance crimes Dignity Persons with mental disabilities Crisis intervention training Memphis Model 

References

  1. Acquaviva, G.L. 2006. Mental Health Courts: No Longer Experimental. Seton Hall Law Review 36: 971–1013.Google Scholar
  2. Bagenstos, S.R. 2012. The Past and Future of Deinstitutionalization Litigation. Cardozo Law Review 34: 1–52.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, A. 1997. Treating Sexual Harassment with Respect. Harvard Law Review 111: 445–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brett, S. 2012. “No Contact” Parole Restrictions: Unconstitutional and Counterproductive. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 18: 485–493.Google Scholar
  5. Brookbanks, W. 2001. Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Conceiving an Ethical Framework. Journal of Law and Medicine 8: 328–341.Google Scholar
  6. Compton, M.T., et al. 2006. Crisis Intervention Team Training: Changes in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Stigma Related to Schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 57: 1199–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2014. The Police-Based Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Model: II. Effects on Level of Force and Resolution, Referral, and Arrest. Psychiatric Services 65 (4): 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, V.G., A.M. Mclearen, and P.A. Zapf. 2004. Dispositional Decisions with the Mentally Ill: Police Perceptions and Characteristics. Police Quarterly 7: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyne, L. 2012. Can Shame Be Therapeutic? Arizona Summit Law Review 7: 539–561.Google Scholar
  10. Cucolo, H.E., and M.L. Perlin. 2017. Promoting Dignity and Preventing Shame and Humiliation by Improving the Quality and Education of Attorneys in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) Civil Commitment Cases. Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. Deane, M.W., et al. 1999. Emerging Partnerships Between Mental Health and Law Enforcement. Psychiatric Services 50: 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeBoise v. Taser Intern., Inc., 760 F.3d 892 (8th Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
  13. Dylan, B. 1967. I am a Lonesome Hobo. Accessible at http://bobdylan.com/songs/i-am-lonesome-hobo/
  14. Fisk, C.L. 2001. Humiliation at Work. William and Mary Journal of Women & Law 8: 73–95.Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, G. 2003. Thinking About Eden: A Tribute to Herbert Morris. QLR 22: 1–21.Google Scholar
  16. Floyd v. City of New York, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).Google Scholar
  17. Fradella, H.F., and R. Smith-Casey. 2014. Criminal Justice Responses to the Mentally Ill. In Criminal Justice Policy, ed. S.A. Mallicoat and C. Gardiner, 201–224. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Garczynski v. Bradshaw, 573 F.3d 1158 (11th Cir. 2009).Google Scholar
  19. Green, T.M. 1997. Police as Frontline Mental Health Workers: The Decision to Arrest or Refer to Mental Health Agencies. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20: 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grisso, T., and P.S. Appelbaum. 1995. The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of Patients to Consent to Psychiatric and Medical Treatments. Law and Human Behavior 19: 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartling, L.M., and T. Luchetta. 1999. Humiliation: Assessing the Impact of Derision, Degradation, and Debasement. Journal of Primary Prevention 19: 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katz, J. 2014. Elements of Shame. In The Widening Scope of Shame, ed. M.R. Lansky and A.P. Morrison, 231–260. New York City: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, D.C. 1991. The Humiliation Dynamic: An Overview. Journal of Primary Prevention 12: 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kondo, L. 2004. Advocacy of the Establishment of Mental Health Specialty Courts in the Provision of Therapeutic Justice for Mentally Ill Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Law 28: 255–336.Google Scholar
  25. Lazare, A., and W.S. Sogg. 2001. Shame, Humiliation and Stigma in the Attorney-Client Relationship. Practical Lawyer 47 (4): 11–21.Google Scholar
  26. Leasure, S.L. 2012. Criminal Law—Teenage Sexting in Arkansas: How Special Legislation Addressing Sexting Behavior in Minors Can Salvage Arkansas’s Teens’ Futures. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 35: 141–164.Google Scholar
  27. Lynch, A.J., and M.L. Perlin. 2017. “Life’s Hurried Tangled Road”: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis of Why Dedicated Counsel Must Be Assigned to Represent Persons with Mental Disabilities in Community Settings. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 35: 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Massaro, T.M. 1991. Shame, Culture, and American Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review 89: 1880–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 1997. The Meanings of Shame Implications for Legal Reform. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3: 645–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 1999. Show (Some) Emotions. In The Pasions of the Law, ed. S. Bandes, 80–122. New York City: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mendoza v City of Rome, 872 F. Supp. 1110 (N.D.N.Y. 1994).Google Scholar
  32. Miller, E.J. 2004. Embracing Addiction: Drug Courts and the False Promise of Judicial Interventionism. Ohio State Law Journal. 65: 1479–1576.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, W.I. 1993. Humiliation & Other Essays on Honor, Social Discomfort, & Violence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Murphy, S., et al. 2012. Crisis Intervention for People with Severe Mental Illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5. Accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204394/
  35. Netter, B. 2005. Avoiding the Shameful Backlash: Social Repercussions for the Increased Use of Alternative Sanctions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 96: 187–215.Google Scholar
  36. Nussbaum, M.C. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Panzarella, R., and J.O. Alicea. 1997. Police Tactics in Incidents with Mentally Disturbed Persons. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 20: 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perlin, M.L. 2008. “Everybody Is Making Love/Or Else Expecting Rain”: Considering the Sexual Autonomy Rights of Persons Institutionalized Because of Mental Disability in Forensic Hospitals and in Asia. Washington Law Review 83: 481–512.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2009. “His Brain Has Been Mismanaged with Great Skill”: How Will Jurors Respond to Neuroimaging Testimony in Insanity Defense Cases? Akron Law Review 42: 885–916.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2013a. A Prescription for Dignity: Rethinking Criminal Justice and Mental Disability Law. Burlington: Ashgate Publ.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2013b. “There Are No Trials Inside the Gates of Eden”: Mental Health Courts, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Dignity, and the Promise of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. In Coercive Care: Law and Policy, ed. B. McSherry and I. Freckelton, 193–217. New York City: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2013c. “Wisdom Is Thrown into Jail”: Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Remediate the Criminalization of Persons with Mental Illness. Michigan State University Journal of Medicine and Law 17: 343–371.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2017. “God Said to Abraham/Kill Me a Son”: Why the Insanity Defense and the Incompetency Status Are Compatible with and Required by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Basic Principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. American Criminal Law Review 54: 477–519.Google Scholar
  44. Perlin, M.L., and A.J. Lynch. 2015. How Teaching About Therapeutic Jurisprudence Can Be a Tool of Social Justice, and Lead Law Students to Personally and Socially Rewarding Careers: Sexuality and Disability as a Case Example. Nevada, Law Journal 16: 209–225.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2016a. “Had to Be Held Down by Big Police”: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspective on Interactions Between Police and Persons with Mental Disabilities. Fordham Urban Law Journal 43: 685–711.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2016b. “In the Wasteland of Your Mind”: Criminology, Scientific Discoveries and the Criminal Process. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law 4: 304–360.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2016c. “Mr. Bad Example”: Why Lawyers Need to Embrace Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Root Out Sanism in the Representation of Persons with Mental Disabilities. Wyoming Law Review 16: 299–323.Google Scholar
  48. Perlin, M.L., and H.E. Cucolo. 2017. “Tolling for the Aching Ones Whose Wounds Cannot Be Nursed”: The Marginalization of Racial Minorities and Women in Institutional Mental Disability Law. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 20: 431–458.Google Scholar
  49. Perlin, M.L., and J. Douard. 2008–09. “Equality, I Spoke That Word/As If a Wedding Vow”: Mental Disability Law and How We Treat Marginalized Persons. New York Law School Law Review 53: 9–29.Google Scholar
  50. Perlin, M.L., and N.M. Weinstein. 2014. “Friend to the Martyr, a Friend to the Woman of Shame”: Thinking About the Law, Shame and Humiliation. Southern California Review of Law & Social Justice 24: 1–50.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2016–2017. “Said I, ‘But You Have No Choice’”: Why a Lawyer Must Ethically Honor a Client’s Decision About Mental Health Treatment Even If It Is Not What S/He Would Have Chosen. Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Law Journal 15: 73–116.Google Scholar
  52. Peschel v. City of Missoula, 686 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (D. Mont. 2009).Google Scholar
  53. Ronner, A.D. 2002. Songs of Validation, Voice, and Voluntary Participation: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Miranda and Juveniles. University of Cincinnati Law Review 71: 79–114.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2008. Learned-Helpless Lawyer: Clinical Legal Education and Therapeutic Jurisprudence as Antidotes to the Bartleby Syndrome. Touro Law Review 24: 601–696.Google Scholar
  55. Sanger, C. 2009. Decisional Dignity: Teenage Abortion, Bypass Hearings, and the Misuse of Law. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 18: 409–499.Google Scholar
  56. Scheff, T.J. 1998. Community Conferences: Shame and Anger in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Revista Juridica U.P.R. 67: 97–119.Google Scholar
  57. Schneider, C.D. 1977. Shame, Exposure and Privacy. New York City: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  58. Schnittker, J., M. Massoglia, and C. Uggen. 2012. Out and Down: Incarceration and Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 53: 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schug, R.A., and H.F. Fradella. 2015. Mental Illness and Crime. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Schwartz, J. 2012. What Police Learn from Lawsuits. Cardozo Law Review 33: 841–894.Google Scholar
  61. Steadman, H.J., et al. 2000. Comparing Outcomes of Major Models of Police Responses to Mental Health Emergencies. Psychiatric Services 51: 645–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Svensson, R., et al. 2013. Moral Emotions and Offending: Do Feelings of Anticipated Shame and Guilt Mediate the Effect of Socialization on Offending? European Journal of Criminology 10: 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Teller, J.L., M.R. Munetz, K.M. Gil, and C. Ritter. 2006. Crisis Intervention Team Training for Police Officers Responding to Mental Disturbance Calls. Psychiatric Services 57: 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Torrey, E.F. 1995. Jails and Prisons–America’s New Mental Hospitals. American Journal of Public Health 85 (12): 1611–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tortu v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 556 F. 3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2009).Google Scholar
  66. Trager, O. 2004. Keys to the Rain: The Definitive Bob Dylan Encyclopedia. New York City: Billboard Books.Google Scholar
  67. Wagner, L.A. 2009. Sex Offender Residency Restrictions: How Common Sense Places Children at Risk. Drexel Law Review 1: 175–209.Google Scholar
  68. Warner, M. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Washington v. Lambert, 98 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir.1996).Google Scholar
  70. Watson, Amy C., and Anjali J. Fulambarker. 2012. The Crisis Intervention Team Model of Police Response to Mental Health Crises. Best Practices in Mental Health 8 (2): 71–81.Google Scholar
  71. Wexler, D.B. 1990. Therapeutic Jurisprudence: The Law as a Therapeutic Agent. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 1993. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Changing Concepts of Legal Scholarship. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 2000. Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Psycholegal Soft Spots and Strategies. In Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Law as a Helping Profession, ed. Daniel P. Stolle et al., vol. 45. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  74. Winick, B.J. 2003. A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model for Civil Commitment. In Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: International Perspective on Civil Commitment, ed. Kate Diesfeld and Ian Freckelton, 2–54. Farnham: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 2009. Foreword: Therapeutic Jurisprudence Perspectives on Dealing with Victims of Crime. Nova Law Review 33: 535–543.Google Scholar
  76. Winick, B.J., and D.B. Wexler. 2006. The Use of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Law School Clinical Education: Transforming the Criminal Law Clinic. Clinical Law Review 13: 605–632.Google Scholar
  77. Wurmser, L. 1981. The Mask of Shame. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Ziel, P. 2005. Eighteenth Century Public Humiliation Penalties in Twenty-First Century America: The “Shameful” Return of “Scarlet Letter” Punishments in U.S. v. Gementera. BYU. Journal of Public Law 19: 499–522.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Perlin
    • 1
  • Alison J. Lynch
    • 2
  1. 1.New York Law School; Mental Disability Law and Policy AssociatesNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Disability Rights New YorkBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations