Advertisement

Goal-Oriented Requirements Analysis Meets a Creativity Technique

  • Tomoo Kinoshita
  • Shinpei Hayashi
  • Motoshi Saeki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10651)

Abstract

Goal-oriented requirements analysis (GORA) has been growing in the area of requirement engineering. It is one of the approaches that elicits and analyzes stakeholders’ requirements as goals to be achieved, and develops an AND-OR graph, called a goal graph, as a result of requirements elicitation. However, although it is important to involve stakeholders’ ideas and viewpoints during requirements elicitation, GORA still has a problem that their processes lack the deeper participation of stakeholders. Regarding stakeholders’ participation, creativity techniques have also become popular in requirements engineering. They aim to create novel and appropriate requirements by involving stakeholders. One of these techniques, the KJ-method is a method which organizes and associates novel ideas generated by Brainstorming. In this paper, we present an approach to support stakeholders’ participation during GORA processes by transforming an affinity diagrams of the KJ-method, into a goal graph, including transformation guidelines, and also apply our approach to an example.

Keywords

Goal-Oriented Requirements Analysis Creativity KJ-method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Number JP15K00088.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaiya, H., Horai, H., Saeki, M.: AGORA: attributed goal-oriented requirements analysis method. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 13–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawakita, J.: KJ Method. Chuokoron-sha, Tokyo (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications, 1st edn. Wiley Publishing, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leonardi, C., Sabatucci, L., Susi, A., Zancanaro, M.: Design as intercultural dialogue: coupling human-centered design with requirement engineering methods. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6948, pp. 485–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23765-2_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahaux, M., Nguyen, L., Gotel, O., Mich, L., Mavin, A., Schmid, K.: Collaborative creativity in requirements engineering: analysis and practical advice. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maiden, N., Jones, S., Karlsen, K., Neill, R., Zachos, K., Milne, A.: Requirements engineering as creative problem solving: a research agenda for idea finding. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 57–66 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ohshiro, K., Watahiki, K., Saeki, M.: Integrating an idea generation method into a goal-oriented analysis method for requirements elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 9–17 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osborn, A.: Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saeki, M., Hayashi, S., Kaiya, H.: A tool for attributed goal-oriented requirements analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 674–676 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sternberg, R.J.: Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svensson, R.B., Taghavianfar, M.: Selecting creativity techniques for creative requirements: an evaluation of four techniques using creativity workshops. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 66–75 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takeda, N., Shiomi, A., Kawai, K., Ohiwa, H.: Requirement analysis by the KJ editor. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 98–101 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wanderley, F., Araujo, J.: Generating goal-oriented models from creative requirements using model driven engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Model-Driven Requirements Engineering, pp. 1–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu, E.S.K.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226–235 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zowghi, D., Coulin, C.: Requirements elicitation: a survey of techniques, approaches, and tools. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 19–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomoo Kinoshita
    • 1
  • Shinpei Hayashi
    • 1
  • Motoshi Saeki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations