Transrational Peaces Extended to Economics

  • Shawn Bryant


The exploration of transrational approaches to economics takes Wolfgang Dietrich’s theories of the families of peaces and of transrational peaces and extends them in new directions. From this initial point of inspiration, the principles of transrational approaches to economics are outlined by explaining how economics generally manifests in each of the four constituent families of peaces. Examples are given to illustrate how some key concepts are inflected through the four quadrants of transrational peaces to create a dynamic synthesis of transrationality.


  1. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. On Glocalization: Or Globalization for Some, Localization for Some Others. Thesis Eleven 54 (1): 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brickman, Philip, and Donald Campbell. 1971. Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society. In Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium, ed. Mortimer H. Apley, 287–302. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, Shawn. 2016. Economics as Seen by the Many Peaces. PhD Dissertation, Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
  4. Costanza, Robert, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, Stephen Farber, Monica Grasso, Bruce Hannon, Karin Limburg, Shahid Naeem, Robert V. O’Neill, Jose Paruelo, Robert G. Raskin, Paul Sutton, and Marjan van den Belt. 1997. The Value of The World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dietrich, Wolfgang. 2012. Interpretations of Peace in History and Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. Elicitive Conflict Transformation and the Transrational Shift in Peace Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2014. A Brief Introduction to Transrational Peace Research and Elicitive Conflict Transformation. Journal of Conflictology 5 (2): 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, ed. Paul A. David and Melvin W. Reder, 89–125. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenstein, Charles. 2011. Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, & Community in an Age of Transition. Berkeley: Evolver Editions.Google Scholar
  10. Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn: Melville House.Google Scholar
  12. Gregory, Christopher. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hart, Michael Anthony. 2002. Seeking Mino-pimatisiwin: An Aboriginal Approach to Helping. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Lovejoy, Arthur. 2009. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Mauss, Marcel. 1925. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. Annee sociologique 1 (2): 30–186.Google Scholar
  16. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  17. Robertson, Roland. 1994. Globalisation or Glocalisation? Journal of International Communication 1 (1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schumacher, Ernst Friedrich. 1973. Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.Google Scholar
  19. Stiglitz, Joseph, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. 2008. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Accessed 10 July 2015.
  20. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1989. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shawn Bryant
    • 1
  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations