Advertisement

Consuming Education

  • Alice Pearson
Chapter

Abstract

Pearson offers compelling ethnographic insight into recent student mobilisations in the economics departments of UK universities. The chapter draws attention to two significant shifts after the financial crisis of 2007–08: the further commodification of the British tertiary education system; and increased demands from students across universities to reform economics curricula, the legitimacy of which had been challenged due to the failure of economic models to allow for the possibility of the crisis. These two shifts have a complex and at times contradictory relationship. Whilst some voices in the heterodox student movement contest the marketisation of education, they also increasingly preface their authority in challenging the syllabus upon ‘consumer sovereignty’. As such, the chapter traces the potential paradoxes in the relationship between the content and form of the students’ demands, particularly with respect to certain consumer and market logics.

Keywords

Higher education Neoliberalism Heterodox economics Commodification 

Works Cited

  1. Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. BIS. 2015a. Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/474227/BIS-15-623-fulfilling-our-potential-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  4. ———. 2015b. Press release: Student choice at the heart of new higher education reforms. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/student-choice-at-the-heart-of-new-higher-education-reforms. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  5. ———. 2016. The teaching excellence framework: Assessing quality in higher education. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmbis/572/572.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean-Claude Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel. 1998. The laws of the markets. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Collini, Stefan. 2016. Who are the spongers now? London Review of Books 38 (2): 33–37.Google Scholar
  11. CSEP. 2014. CSEP survey of economics students: Is it time for change at Cambridge? http://www.cambridgepluralism.org/uploads/1/7/4/9/17499733/report_v14_w.appendix.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  12. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel, Graham Burchell, and Arnold Davidson. 2008. The birth of biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Fourcade, Marion, Etienne Ollion, and Yann Algan. 2015. The superiority of economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  16. Gramsci, Antonio. 1972. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Harvey, David. 2005. A brief history of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hyatt, Susan Brin, Boone W. Shear, and Susan Wright. 2015. Learning under neoliberalism: Ethnographies of governance in higher education. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  19. ISIPE. 2014. International student initiative for pluralism in economics. http://www.isipe.net. Accessed 24 Apr.
  20. Lawson, Tony. 1997. Economics and reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2005. The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (4): 483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2009. The current economic crisis: Its nature and the course of academic economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (4): 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (5): 947–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lebaron, Frédéric. 2001. Economists and the economic order: The field of economists and the field of power in France. European Societies 3 (1): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2006. “Nobel” economists as public intellectuals. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 43 (1): 88–101.Google Scholar
  26. MacKenzie, Donald. 2007. An engine, not a camera. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Massey, Doreen. 2013. Vocabularies of the economy. In After neoliberalism? The Kilburn manifesto, ed. Stuart Hall, Doreen Massey, and Michael Rustin, 3–17. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  28. McGettigan, Andrew. 2013. The great university gamble: Money, markets and the future of higher education. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More heat than light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2013. Never let a serious crisis go to waste. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, Timothy. 1998. Fixing the economy. Cultural Studies 12 (1): 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NUS. 2015. The higher education green paper in a nutshell. http://www.nus.org.uk/en/news/the-higher-education-green-paper-in-a-nutshell/. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  33. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. PCES. 2014. Economics, education and unlearning: Economics education at the University of Manchester. Manchester: The Post-Crash Economics Society.Google Scholar
  35. Power, Michael. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Robbins, Lionel Charles Robbins. 1935. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Shore, Cris. 2010. Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology 18 (1): 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shore, Cris, and Miri Davidson. 2014. Beyond collusion and resistance: Academic management relations within the neoliberal university. Learning and Teaching 7 (1): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 1999. Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spence, Michael. 1973. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. Audit cultures. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright, Erik Olin. 2010. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, Susan. 2015. Anthropology and the “imaginators” of future European universities. Focaal 2015 (71): 6–17.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, Susan, and Annika Rabo. 2010. Introduction: Anthropologies of university reform. Social Anthropology 18 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations