Advertisement

The Coming Crisis of Academic Authority

  • Eric R. Lybeck
Chapter

Abstract

Lybeck establishes that the Western university bears clear signs of a long-standing and worrying trend: the prioritisation of the research function over its traditional teaching function. This degrades students’ education, and has turned academics into supplicants beholden to governments and market interests on whom they rely for research grants and publications. The result is the coming crisis of academic authority: researchers’ retention of academic rights, without corresponding responsibility for those in their care, particularly students. In addition, the chapter shows that alternative visions of higher education face serious obstacles, evident in Lybeck’s unsuccessful attempt to become Graduate Union President at the University of Cambridge on a platform to (re)introduce the model of the scholastic guild prevalent centuries ago, into which graduate students pay to support a community of postgraduates entering the labour market.

Keywords

Academic authority Scholastic guild Universities 

Works Cited

  1. Abbott, Andrew. 1981. Status and status strain in the professions. American Journal of Sociology 86 (4): 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baehr, Peter. 2011. Purity and danger in the modern university. Society 48 (4): 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldamus, Wilhelm. 2010. The sociology of Wilhelm Baldamus: Paradox and inference. Edited by M. Erickson and C. Turner. Basingstoke/Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, Elizabeth Popp. 2011. Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Block, Fred, and Matthew R. Keller. 2009. Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the US economy, 1970–2006. Socio-Economic Review 7 (3): 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 2015. Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  8. Eagleton, Terry. 2014. The death of universities. The Guardian, December 17. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/dec/17/death-universities-malaise-tuition-fees. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  9. Etzioni, Amitai. 1969. The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 1996. A triple helix of academic-industry-government relations: Development models beyond “capitalism versus socialism”. Current Science 70 (8): 690–693.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1998. The endless transition: A “triple helix” of university-industry-government relations. Minerva 36 (3): 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleck, Christian. 2011. A transatlantic history of the social sciences: Robber Barons, the Third Reich and the invention of empirical social research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger, Roger L. 1985. Hierarchy and diversity in American research universities. In The university research system: The public policies of the scientists, ed. Björn Wittrock and Aant Elzinga, 53–74. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  14. Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffman, Jan. 1998. Judge not, law schools demand of a magazine that ranks them. New York Times, February 19.Google Scholar
  16. Inglis, David. 2014. What is worth defending in sociology today? Presentism, historical vision and the uses of sociology. Cultural Sociology 8 (1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamont, Michèle. 2010. How professors think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lewin, Tamar. 2013. As interest fades in the humanities, colleges worry. The New York Times, October 30. Retrieved 2 November 2013 (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/education/as-interest-fades-in-the-humanities-colleges-worry.html).
  19. Lybeck, E.R. 2011. For pragmatic public sociology: Theory and practice after the pragmatic turn. Current Perspectives in Social Theory 29: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin, John Levi. 2003. What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology 109 (1): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGettigan, Andrew. 2013. The great university gamble: Money, markets and the future of higher education. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, John. 2014. Students at Pearson College get green light for SLC funds. Times Higher Education, August 21. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/students-at-pearson-college-get-green-light-for-slc-funds/2015273.article. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.
  23. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. 2012. Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2012.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric R. Lybeck
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations