• Barbara Kożuch
  • Sławomir J. Magala
  • Joanna Paliszkiewicz


Contemporary management goes beyond individual organizations. The increasing frequency of international encounters has led to crises of greater complexity and variety. Sorting out and solving these crises requires fundamental trust, which is a very fragile component of organizational interactions. Trust is difficult to establish and sustain, but it can be destroyed very easily. People create expectations about others, believing that they will behave in a way that is beneficial and not harmful for the parties in an interaction. Trust is a very important part of social and organizational life, especially in situations where the trustor depends on the trustee’s future actions to achieve her or his own goals and objectives. This is of great importance in managing public organizations. The necessity of establishing conditions of creating public trust is becoming omnipresent (Denhardt 2011; Lane 2009). Thus, trust must be taken into account in the operations of any public organization.


  1. Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 9394.Google Scholar
  2. Bouckaert, G., & Van de Wall, S. (2003a, January). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343.Google Scholar
  3. Bouckaert, G., & Van de Wall, S. (2003b). Quality of public service delivery and trust in government. In A. Salminen (Ed.), Governing networks: EGPA yearbook. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (2008). Research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  5. Carnevale, D. G. (1995). Trustworthy government: Leaderships and management strategies for building trust and high performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Denhardt, R. B. (2009/2011). Theories of public organization (International Edition). Boston: Wodsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  7. Feldheim, M. A., & Wang, X. (2004). Ethics and public trust. Public Integrity, 6(1).Google Scholar
  8. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtue and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harisalo, R., & Stenvall, J. (2004). Citizens’ trust in ministers. In M. Huotari & M. Iivonen (Eds.), Trust in knowledge management and systems in organizations (pp. 147–117). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heichlinger, A., & Vanebo, J. O. (2013). Public sector and the new (“old”) technology (pp. 81–97). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  12. Klijn, E. H., & Eshuis, J. (2013). Trust and networks. In S. Llewellyn, S. Brookes, & A. Mahon (Eds.), Trust and confidence in government and public services (pp. 52–54). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kożuch, B., & Dobrowolski, Z. (2014). Creating public trust. An organisational perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
  14. Lane, J.-E. (2009). State management. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Llewellyn, S., Brooks, S., & Mahon, A. (2013). Trust and confidence in government and public services. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Six, F. (2004). Trust and trouble. Building interpersonal trust within organizations. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Kożuch
    • 1
  • Sławomir J. Magala
    • 2
  • Joanna Paliszkiewicz
    • 3
  1. 1.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Warsaw University of Life SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations