Advertisement

For the Attention of African Media Scholars: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis

  • Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u
Chapter

Abstract

Contemporary communication research in Africa is heavily influenced by theories and methodologies developed in the West. There are several reasons for this. The first is the colonial relationship between African countries and their former European colonisers: most African countries were at some point colonised by Britain, France, Portugal and Italy and so their media systems were shaped by those of the former colonisers. Second, the contemporary educational system in African countries was established according to colonial models. Thirdly, media scholars in Africa were trained in Western universities, therefore transferring the theories and methodologies they learnt during their years of research in the West back to the continent. As discussed by Obeng-Quaidoo (1986), by the time African scholars return to the continent from the West, it takes them at least six years to digest the concepts and theories they have learnt and discover whether they are workable in the continent or not. The use of English, French, Portuguese and other foreign languages as the medium of instruction in universities is another factor that contributes to the domination of Western theories and methodologies in communication research.

References

  1. Ansu-Kyeremeh, K. (2005). Indigenous communication in Africa. Accra: Ghana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bourghault, L. M. (1995). Mass media in sub-Saharan Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bunce, M., Suzanne, F., & Paterson, C. (Eds.). (2017). Africa’s media image in the 21st century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Chouliarki, L. (2000). Political discourse in the news: Democratising responsibility or aestheticizing politics? Discourse and Society, 11(3), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  6. Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour new language? London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Fairclough, N. (2016). Language and power (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, B. (2004). Packaging politics: Political communication in Britain’s media. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hallin, D., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 175–195.Google Scholar
  13. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent. The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  14. Hyden, G., Leslie, M., & Ogundinmu, F. F. (Eds.). (2002). Media and democracy in Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitute.Google Scholar
  15. Lawson, C. H. (2002). Building the fourth estate. Democratisation and the rise of free press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 15–31). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Norris, P., Curtis, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetco, H. A. (1999). On message: Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Okigbo, C. C., & Eribo, F. (Eds.). (2004). Development and communication in Africa. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleman.Google Scholar
  19. Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organisation of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse and Society, 12(3), 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Omu, F. I. (1978). Press and politics in Nigeria: 1886–1937. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Obeng-Quaidoo, I. (1986). A Proposal for new communication research methodologies in Africa. Africa Media Review, 1(1), 89–98.Google Scholar
  22. Resigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers. An Approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Skinner, E. P. (1998). African political cultures and the problems of government. African Studies Quarterly, 2(3), 17–25.Google Scholar
  25. Skjerdal, T. S. (2010). Research on brown envelop journalism in the African media. African Communication Research, 3(33), 367–406.Google Scholar
  26. Tomaselli, K. G. (2002). A brief history of South African journalism, mass communication and media education. African Communication Scholars Association, 4(1), 111–135.Google Scholar
  27. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.Google Scholar
  28. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Multidesciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120).Google Scholar
  29. Waisbord, S. (2000). Watchdog journalism in South America. News accountability and democracy. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wasserman, H., & Maweu, J. M. (2014). The freedom to be silent? Market pressures on journalistic normative ideals at the Nation Media Group in Kenya. Review of African Political Economy, 41(142), 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wasswa, J. B., & Kakooza, M. (2011, November). Media and corruption. Uganda Media Review, No. 11, 1–54.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, E. I. (2014). Brown envelop and the future of journalism in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 1(1), 148–156.Google Scholar
  33. Wodak, R. (2001a). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. Retrieved from December 20, 2017, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.1792&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  34. Wodak, R. (2001b). What CDA is about-a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 15–31). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Yusha’u, M. J. (2009). Investigative journalism and scandal reporting in the Nigerian press. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 30(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yusha’u, M. J. (2010a). Regional parallelism and the reporting of corruption in the Nigerian press. Journal of African Media Studies, 2(3), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yusha’u, M. J. (2010b). Coverage of corruption scandals in the Nigerian press. A comparative analysis of Northern and Southern Newspapers. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u
    • 1
  1. 1.Uni Focus AcademyKanoNigeria

Personalised recommendations