Introduction Negative Modernism: Beckett’s Poetics of Pejorism and Literary Enactment

  • Dirk Van Hulle
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature book series (PMEL)

Abstract

The relationship between Beckett and modernism remains a much-contested issue in Beckett studies and beyond. Beckett’s place in the modernist canon has been questioned both on the grounds of periodization and style, with the term ‘late modernist’ increasingly gaining ground in the more recent scholarship. Without disputing Weller’s definition, this essay suggests a different approach by foregrounding Beckett’s trademark ‘fidelity to failure’ and his radical denial of the Leibnizian concept of theodicy. To explore the philosophical prehistory of what could be termed Beckett’s negative modernism, it first discusses the ‘epiphanic’ modernism of his more canonical predecessors and then traces the contours of Beckett’s own poetics of ‘pejorism’ (a term he coined in the margins of his copy of Olga Plümacher’s Der Pessimismus and in his ‘Whoroscope’ Notebook) to examine how his negative modernism is enacted in his works.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 313609.

References

  1. Abbott, H. Porter. 1990. Late Modernism: Samuel Beckett and the Art of the Oeuvre. In Around the Absurd: Essays on Modern and Post-Modern Drama, ed. Enoch Brater and Ruby Cohn, 73–96. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2013. Real Mysteries: Narrative and the Unknowable. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1973. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E.B. Ashton. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Atik, Anne. 2001. How It Was: A Memoir of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, J.M. 2001. Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Childs, Peter. 2017. Modernism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Connor, Steven. 2014. Beckett, Modernism and the Material Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronin, Anthony. 1996. Samuel Beckett: The Last Modernist. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Dienstag, Joshua Foa. 2009. Pessimism: Philosophy, Ethic, Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, Matthew. 2006. Beckett’s Books: A Cultural History of the Interwar Notes. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Gide, André. 1923. Dostoïevski: articles et causeries. Paris: Librairie Plon.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, Lawrence. 1970. Samuel Beckett: Poet and Critic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Latham, Sean, and Gayle Rogers. 2015. Modernism: Evolution of an Idea. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  14. Mauthner, Fritz. 1923. Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache. Vol. 3. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  15. McHale, Brian. 1992. Constructing Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2013. Reconstructing Postmodernism. Narrative 21 (3): 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNaughton, James. 2005. Beckett, German Fascism and History: The Futility of Protest. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 15: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2006. The Continuities of Late Modernism: Before and After Beckett. In British and Irish Fiction since 1940, ed. Peter Boxall and Bryan Cheyette, 146–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Murphet, Julian, Rónán McDonald, and Sascha Morrell. 2014. Flann O’Brien and Modernism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, P.J., and Nick Pawliuk. 2016. Beckett in Popular Culture: Essays on a Postmodern Icon. Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
  21. Nicol, Bran. 2009. The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodern Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 1980. Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden. Ed. Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari. München, Berlin, and New York: dtv/De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Ning, Wang. 2013. Historicizing Postmodernist Fiction. Narrative 21 (3): 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2011. Samuel Beckett’s German Diaries 1936–1937. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Nugent-Folan, Georgina. 2013. ‘Ill buttoned’: Comparing the Representation of Objects in Samuel Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Gertrude Stein’s Tender Buttons. Journal of Beckett Studies 22 (1): 54–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Reilly, Édouard Magessa, Dirk Van Hulle, and Pim Verhulst. 2017. The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘Molloy’. Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2006. Beckett and Mauthner Revisited. In Beckett After Beckett, ed. S.E. Gontarski and Anthony Uhlmann, 158–166. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  28. Plümacher, Olga. 1888. Der Pessimismus in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart: Geschichtliches und Kritisches. Heidelberg: Georg Weiss Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Pothast, Ulrich. 2008. The Metaphysical Vision: Arthur Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Art and Life and Samuel Beckett’s Own Way to Make Use of It. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  30. Proust, Marcel. 1928. À la recherche du temps perdu: Du Côté de chez Swann, vol. 1. Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2016a. The Pathos of Distance: Affects of the Moderns. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  32. Stanford Friedman, Susan. 2001. Definitional Excursions: The Meanings of Modern/Modernity/Modernism. Modernism/Modernity 8 (3): 493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stein, Gertrude. 1926. Composition as Explanation. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1975. How To Write. Ed. Patricia Meyerowitz. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1998. Poetry and Grammar. In Writings 1932–1946, 313–336. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2004. Look at Me Now and Here I Am: Selected Works 1911–1945. Ed. Patricia Meyerowitz. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
  37. Tonning, Erik. 2007. Samuel Beckett’s Abstract Drama: Works for Stage and Screen 1962–1985. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  38. Van Hulle, Dirk, and Mark Nixon. 2013. Samuel Beckett’s Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Van Hulle, Dirk, and Shane Weller. 2014. The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘L’Innommable’/‘The Unnamable’. Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfe, Ross. 2008. Adorno’s Critique of Hegel’s Theodical Philosophy of History in Negative Dialectics. The Charnel House: From Bauhaus to Beinhaus. https://thecharnelhouse.org/2008/06/20/adornos-critique-of-hegels-philosophy-of-history-in-negative-dialectics/#_ftn1
  41. ———. 2008. Orlando. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2015. Mrs. Dalloway. Ed. Anne E. Fernald. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Virginia Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Yeats, W.B. 1961. The Senate Speeches of W.B. Yeats. Ed. Donald Pearce. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Van Hulle
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations