Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Mission Creep of the National Bank of Hungary

  • Miklós Sebők
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy book series (PEPP)

Abstract

The chapter investigates a hitherto unexamined case of central bank mission creep: that of the National Bank of Hungary (MNB) under the leadership of György Matolcsy after 2013. Based on the core ideas of the literature on institutional entrepreneurship and institutional change, a qualitative case study relying on elite interviews and document analysis is presented. This shows how and why the mission creep could stretch the Hungarian central bank’s policy portfolio beyond recognition in, inter alia, assuming development banking functions, buying commercial banks, purchasing real estate, creating research foundations and even university departments. These self-proclaimed ‘unorthodox’ measures reflected the long-held positions and institutional entrepreneurship of Matolcsy, a former minister for the economy. The case study offers new insights into the impact of institutional entrepreneurship on the medium-term evolution of economic policy institutions.

References

  1. Ágh, A. (2014). Decline of democracy in East-Central Europe: The last decade as the lost decade in democratization. Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 4.Google Scholar
  2. Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ban, C. (2015). Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the international monetary fund since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ban, C., & Gallagher, K. (2015). Recalibrating policy orthodoxy: The IMF since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, A. (2008). Process tracing: A Bayesian perspective. In J. E. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 702–721). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blinder, A. S. (1999). Central banking in theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and paradox: The politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823.Google Scholar
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Cukierman, A., Miller, G. P., & Neyapti, B. (2002). Central bank reform, liberalization and inflation in transition economies—An international perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(2), 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dandashly, A., & Verdun, A. (2016). Euro adoption in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: Laggards by default and laggards by choice. Comparative European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.1046
  16. David, C. P. (2015). Policy entrepreneurs and the reorientation of national security policy under the G. W. Bush administration (2001–04). Politics & Policy, 43(1), 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ecklund, G. J. (2008). Creating a new role for an old central bank: The Bank of Norway 1945–1954. Thesis, Norwegian School of Management.Google Scholar
  21. Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frenkel, M., & Nickel, C. (2005). New European Union members on their way to adopting the Euro: An analysis of macroeconomic disturbances. Global Finance Journal, 15(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frömmel, M., Kiss, M., & Pintér, K. (2011). Macroeconomic announcements, communication and order flow on the Hungarian foreign exchange market. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 16(2), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooren, F. V., Kaasch, A., & Starke, P. (2014). The shock routine: Economic crisis and the nature of social policy responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(4), 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, J. (2006). Two-track diffusion and central bank embeddedness: The politics of Euro adoption in Hungary and the Czech Republic. Review of International Political Economy, 13(3), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, J. (2008). The remains of conditionality: The faltering enlargement of the euro zone. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 826–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, J., & Barnes, A. (2015). Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joyce, M., Miles, D., Scott, A., & Vayanos, D. (2012). Quantitative easing and unconventional monetary policy: An introduction. The Economic Journal, 122(564), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kellstedt, P. M., & Whitten, G. D. (2009). The fundamentals of political science research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kißmer, F., & Wagner, H. (1998). Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: A survey of the evidence. FernUniversitat Hagen.Google Scholar
  34. King, M. (2005). Epistemic communities and the diffusion of ideas: Central bank reform in the United Kingdom. West European Politics, 28(1), 94–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  36. Knill, C. (Ed.). (2013). Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, causes and empirical findings. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Kočenda, E., & Valachy, J. (2006). Exchange rate volatility and regime change: A Visegrad comparison. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lohmann, S. (1994). Designing a central bank in a federal system: The Deutsche Bundesbank, 1957–1992. In P. L. Siklos (Ed.), Varieties of monetary reforms: Lessons and experiences on the road to monetary union (pp. 247–277). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lohmann, S. (1998). Federalism and central bank independence: The politics of German monetary policy, 1957–92. World Politics, 50(3), 401–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2009). The contested institutionalization of policy paradigm shifts: The adoption of inflation targeting in Israel. Socio-Economic Review, 7(2), 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandelkern, R. (2015). What made economists so politically influential? Governance-related ideas and institutional entrepreneurship in the economic liberalisation of Israel and beyond. New Political Economy, 20(6), 924–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcussen, M. (2005). Central banks on the move. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 903–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mérő, K., & Piroska, D. (2016). Banking Union and banking nationalism: Explaining opt-out choices of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. Policy and Society, 35(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Odell, J. S. (2001). Case study methods in international political economy. International Studies Perspectives, 2(2), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostrom, E. (2005). Unlocking public entrepreneurship and public economies. WIDER Discussion Papers/World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER), 2005(1).Google Scholar
  49. Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pogátsa, Z. (2009). Hungary: From star transition student to backsliding member state. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(4), 597–613.Google Scholar
  51. Polillo, S., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1764–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Policy network analysis. In R. E. Goodin, M. Moran, & M. Rein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 423–445). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sebők, M. (2011). President Wilson and the International Origins of the Federal Reserve System—A Reappraisal. White House Studies, 10(4), 424–447.Google Scholar
  57. Sedelmeier, U. (2014). Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  58. Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siklos, P. L., & Ábel, I. (2002). Is Hungary ready for inflation targeting? Economic Systems, 26(4), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trampusch, C. (2015). The financialisation of sovereign debt: An institutional analysis of the reforms in German public debt management. German Politics, 24(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vennesson, P. (2008). Case studies and process tracing: Theories and practices. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences. A pluralist perspective (pp. 223–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Young, K. (2014). The complex and covert web of financial protectionism. Business and Politics, 16(4), 579–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miklós Sebők
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Social SciencesHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations